Literature DB >> 21471114

Archaeobotanical evidence for a massive loss of epiphyte species richness during industrialization in southern England.

Christopher J Ellis1, Rebecca Yahr, Brian J Coppins.   

Abstract

This paper describes a novel archaeological resource--preserved epiphytes on the timber structure of vernacular buildings--used, to our knowledge, for the first time to quantify a loss of biodiversity between pre-industrial and post-industrial landscapes. By matching the confirmed occurrence of epiphyte species for the pre-industrial period, with a statistical likelihood for their absence in the present-day landscape (post-1960), we robustly identified species that have been extirpated across three contrasting regions in southern England. First, the scale of biodiversity loss observed--up to 80 per cent of epiphytes--severely challenges biodiversity targets and environmental baselines that have been developed using reference points in the post-industrial period. Second, we examined sensitivity in the present-day distribution of extirpated species, explained by three environmental drivers: (i) pollution regime, (ii) extent of ancient woodland, and (iii) climatic setting. Results point to an interacting effect between the pollution regime (sulphur dioxide) and changed woodland structure, leading to distinctive regional signatures in biodiversity loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21471114      PMCID: PMC3189363          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

Review 1.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.

Authors:  O E Sala; F S Chapin; J J Armesto; E Berlow; J Bloomfield; R Dirzo; E Huber-Sanwald; L F Huenneke; R B Jackson; A Kinzig; R Leemans; D M Lodge; H A Mooney; M Oesterheld; N L Poff; M T Sykes; B H Walker; M Walker; D H Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time.

Authors:  Anne E Magurran; Stephen R Baillie; Stephen T Buckland; Jan McP Dick; David A Elston; E Marian Scott; Rognvald I Smith; Paul J Somerfield; Allan D Watt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Providing baselines for biodiversity measurement.

Authors:  Katherine J Willis; Lindsey Gillson; Terry M Brncic; Blanca L Figueroa-Rangel
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world.

Authors:  Toby A Gardner; Jos Barlow; Robin Chazdon; Robert M Ewers; Celia A Harvey; Carlos A Peres; Navjot S Sodhi
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Macroeconomic policy, growth, and biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Philip Lawn
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries.

Authors:  D Pauly
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 8.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Population growth, human development, and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots.

Authors:  S Jha; K S Bawa
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of Nature?

Authors:  Will Steffen; J Crutzen; John R McNeill
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.