RATIONALE: Benefits of identifying risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely premature infants include providing prognostic information, identifying infants likely to benefit from preventive strategies, and stratifying infants for clinical trial enrollment. OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and the competing outcome of death, by postnatal day; to identify which risk factors improve prediction; and to develop a Web-based estimator using readily available clinical information to predict risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death. METHODS: We assessed infants of 23-30 weeks' gestation born in 17 centers of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network and enrolled in the Neonatal Research Network Benchmarking Trial from 2000-2004. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was defined as a categorical variable (none, mild, moderate, or severe). We developed and validated models for bronchopulmonary dysplasia risk at six postnatal ages using gestational age, birth weight, race and ethnicity, sex, respiratory support, and Fi(O(2)), and examined the models using a C statistic (area under the curve). A total of 3,636 infants were eligible for this study. Prediction improved with advancing postnatal age, increasing from a C statistic of 0.793 on Day 1 to a maximum of 0.854 on Day 28. On Postnatal Days 1 and 3, gestational age best improved outcome prediction; on Postnatal Days 7, 14, 21, and 28, type of respiratory support did so. A Web-based model providing predicted estimates for bronchopulmonary dysplasia by postnatal day is available at https://neonatal.rti.org. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely premature infants can be determined accurately using a limited amount of readily available clinical information.
RATIONALE: Benefits of identifying risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely premature infants include providing prognostic information, identifying infants likely to benefit from preventive strategies, and stratifying infants for clinical trial enrollment. OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and the competing outcome of death, by postnatal day; to identify which risk factors improve prediction; and to develop a Web-based estimator using readily available clinical information to predict risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death. METHODS: We assessed infants of 23-30 weeks' gestation born in 17 centers of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network and enrolled in the Neonatal Research Network Benchmarking Trial from 2000-2004. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was defined as a categorical variable (none, mild, moderate, or severe). We developed and validated models for bronchopulmonary dysplasia risk at six postnatal ages using gestational age, birth weight, race and ethnicity, sex, respiratory support, and Fi(O(2)), and examined the models using a C statistic (area under the curve). A total of 3,636 infants were eligible for this study. Prediction improved with advancing postnatal age, increasing from a C statistic of 0.793 on Day 1 to a maximum of 0.854 on Day 28. On Postnatal Days 1 and 3, gestational age best improved outcome prediction; on Postnatal Days 7, 14, 21, and 28, type of respiratory support did so. A Web-based model providing predicted estimates for bronchopulmonary dysplasia by postnatal day is available at https://neonatal.rti.org. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely premature infants can be determined accurately using a limited amount of readily available clinical information.
Authors: Barbara J Stoll; Nellie I Hansen; Edward F Bell; Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Michele C Walsh; Ellen C Hale; Nancy S Newman; Kurt Schibler; Waldemar A Carlo; Kathleen A Kennedy; Brenda B Poindexter; Neil N Finer; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Shahnaz Duara; Pablo J Sánchez; T Michael O'Shea; Ronald N Goldberg; Krisa P Van Meurs; Roger G Faix; Dale L Phelps; Ivan D Frantz; Kristi L Watterberg; Shampa Saha; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jeffrey D Horbar; Gary J Badger; Joseph H Carpenter; Avroy A Fanaroff; Sarah Kilpatrick; Meena LaCorte; Roderic Phibbs; Roger F Soll Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: M Keszler; S M Donn; R L Bucciarelli; D C Alverson; M Hart; V Lunyong; H D Modanlou; A Noguchi; S A Pearlman; A Puri Journal: J Pediatr Date: 1991-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Alice Hadchouel; Xavier Durrmeyer; Emmanuelle Bouzigon; Roberto Incitti; Johanna Huusko; Pierre-Henri Jarreau; Richard Lenclen; Florence Demenais; Marie-Laure Franco-Montoya; Inès Layouni; Juliana Patkai; Jacques Bourbon; Mikko Hallman; Claude Danan; Christophe Delacourt Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Halana V Whitehead; Christopher C McPherson; Zachary A Vesoulis; Barbara A Cohlan; Rakesh Rao; Barbara B Warner; F Sessions Cole Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Ravi Mangal Patel; Andrea Knezevic; Jing Yang; Neeta Shenvi; Michael Hinkes; John D Roback; Kirk A Easley; Cassandra D Josephson Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-02-23 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Hui Wang; Krystal R St Julien; David K Stevenson; Thomas J Hoffmann; John S Witte; Laura C Lazzeroni; Mark A Krasnow; Cecele C Quaintance; John W Oehlert; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Jeffrey B Gould; Gary M Shaw; Hugh M O'Brodovich Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jean F Regal; B Paige Lawrence; Alex C Johnson; Sarah J Lojovich; Michael A O'Reilly Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 6.377
Authors: Nicole R Dobson; Ravi M Patel; P Brian Smith; Devon R Kuehn; Jennifer Clark; Shilpa Vyas-Read; Amy Herring; Matthew M Laughon; David Carlton; Carl E Hunt Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 4.406