Literature DB >> 21470869

Re-operations on the proximal thoracic aorta: results and predictors of short- and long-term mortality in a series of 174 patients.

Marco Di Eusanio1, Paolo Berretta, Luca Bissoni, Francesco D Petridis, Luca Di Marco, Roberto Di Bartolomeo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report results and to identify predictors of hospital and long-term mortality in patients undergoing re-operations on the proximal thoracic aorta.
METHODS: Between 1986 and 2009,174 re-operations on the proximal thoracic aorta after previous aortic surgery were performed in our Institution. The patients' mean age was 58 years, 132 (75.9%) were men. The mean time from last operation was 9.9 years. An urgent operation was performed in 35 (20.1%) patients. Indications for surgery included degenerative and chronic post-dissection aneurysm (n=133), acute dissection (n=8), false aneurysm (n=22), and active prosthetic infection (n=11). Root procedures were performed in 65 (37.3%) patients, ascending aorta replacement in 27 (15.5%), different extents of aortic arch replacement in 39 (22.4%), and root, ascending aorta and arch replacement in 43 (24.7%).
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 12.6%. On multivariate analysis, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (odds ratio (OR)=1.1018 per min), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV (OR=3.86), and active endocarditis (OR=5.15) emerged as independent predictors of hospital mortality. Mean follow-up time was 56 months. The estimated 1-, 5-, and 10 years' survival were 81.6%, 74.2%, and 44.5%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR)=1.037 per year) and CPB time (HR=1.010 per min) emerged as independent risk factors of late mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Short- and long-term survival was satisfactory being excellent in patients with degenerative aneurysms and dismal in those with active endocarditis. Extensive aortic resections did not increase hospital mortality and were associated with a reduced need for aortic re-interventions. CPB time remains the most important risk factor for reduced survival in aortic surgery.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21470869     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

Review 1.  Redo proximal thoracic aortic surgery: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Athanasios Antoniou; Mohamad Bashir; Amer Harky; Carmelo Di Salvo
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-05-18

2.  Endovascular repair of the ascending aorta: the last frontier?

Authors:  Drosos Kotelis; Johannes Kalder; Michael J Jacobs
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Systematic review of interventions to repair ascending aortic pseudoaneurysms.

Authors:  Henry C Quevedo; Ricardo Santiago-Trinidad; Jorge Castellanos; Kimberly Atianzar; Asif Anwar; Nidal Abi Rafeh
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

4.  Tips and tricks in redo aortic surgery.

Authors:  Worawong Slisatkorn; Vutthipong Sanphasitvong; Nutthawadee Luangthong; Chanyapat Kaewsaengeak
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-02-08

5.  Analysis of postsurgical aortic false aneurysm in 27 patients.

Authors:  Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Antioco Cappai; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Alessandro Barbone; Alessio Basciu; Enrico Citterio; Diego Ornaghi; Giuseppe Tarelli; Fabrizio Settepani
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.