Frédéric Pouliot1, Allan Pantuck, Annie Imbeault, Brian Shuch, Brian Calimlim, Jean-François Audet, David S Finley, Thierry Dujardin. 1. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC; Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA Dr. Pouliot was supported in part by a scholarship from Les Bourses McLaughlin du Doyen, a scholarship from the Association des Urologues du Québec and a scholarship from the CMDP (Committee of physicians, dentists and pharmacists) of the Laval University Hospital Centre.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is now the gold standard for the surgical treatment of small renal masses. We evaluated the effect of WIT and other factors on RDF assessed by preoperative and postoperative renal scintigraphy. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, 182 consecutive laparoscopic PN (LPN) were performed in an academic centre. Among those, 56 had mercaptoacetyl triglycine (MAG3) lasix renal scintigraphy preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Medians for age, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and computed tomography scan tumour size were 62 years, 82 mL/min/1.73m(2) and 26 mm, respectively. Median WIT and preoperative RDF were 30 minutes and 50%, respectively. Median loss of RDF after surgery was 14%. Linear regression curves showed that loss in RDF rate was 0.2% per minute when WIT was <30 minutes and 0.7% per minute when WIT was ≥30 minutes. In multivariate analysis, length of WIT and endophytic tumour location were associated with a statistically significant loss of RDF (p < 0.05), but only in the group who experienced >30 minutes of WIT. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that the factors associated with loss of RDF are not the same before and after 30 minutes of WIT and that the rate of loss in RDF increases after 30 minutes. Since, the effect of WIT is small up to 30 minutes, we believe that surgery should focus on limiting the resection of normal parenchyma and to ensure negative margins and hemostasis, rather than on premature unclamping.
BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is now the gold standard for the surgical treatment of small renal masses. We evaluated the effect of WIT and other factors on RDF assessed by preoperative and postoperative renal scintigraphy. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, 182 consecutive laparoscopic PN (LPN) were performed in an academic centre. Among those, 56 had mercaptoacetyl triglycine (MAG3) lasix renal scintigraphy preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Medians for age, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and computed tomography scan tumour size were 62 years, 82 mL/min/1.73m(2) and 26 mm, respectively. Median WIT and preoperative RDF were 30 minutes and 50%, respectively. Median loss of RDF after surgery was 14%. Linear regression curves showed that loss in RDF rate was 0.2% per minute when WIT was <30 minutes and 0.7% per minute when WIT was ≥30 minutes. In multivariate analysis, length of WIT and endophytic tumour location were associated with a statistically significant loss of RDF (p < 0.05), but only in the group who experienced >30 minutes of WIT. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that the factors associated with loss of RDF are not the same before and after 30 minutes of WIT and that the rate of loss in RDF increases after 30 minutes. Since, the effect of WIT is small up to 30 minutes, we believe that surgery should focus on limiting the resection of normal parenchyma and to ensure negative margins and hemostasis, rather than on premature unclamping.
Authors: William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Igor Frank; Christine M Lohse; Ismail R Saad; Amr Fergany; Horst Zincke; Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; Andrew C Novick Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Börje Ljungberg; Damian C Hanbury; Marcus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Peter F A Mulders; Jean-Jacques Patard; Ioanel C Sinescu Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Mihir M Desai; Inderbir S Gill; Anup P Ramani; Massimiliano Spaliviero; Lisa Rybicki; Jihad H Kaouk Journal: BJU Int Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: William K Johnston; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Brian D Seifman; Brent K Hollenbeck; J Stuart Wolf Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Frank Becker; Hein Van Poppel; Oliver W Hakenberg; Christian Stief; Inderbir Gill; Giorgio Guazzoni; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Russo; Michael Stöckle Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jonathan D Harper; Anup Shah; Stuart B Mitchell; Yak-Nam Wang; Frank Starr; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum Journal: J Endourol Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Giovanni Di Lascio; Alessandro Sciarra; Francesco Del Giudice; Stefano Salciccia; Gian Maria Busetto; Ettore De Berardinis; Gian Piero Ricciuti; Daniele Castellani; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Martina Maggi; Alessandro Gentilucci; Susanna Cattarino; Gianna Mariotti; Paolo Casale; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2022-01-12