Jenny L McDonald1, Elizabeth Comino, Jennifer Knight, Vana Webster. 1. Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia. jenny.mcdonald@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
Abstract
AIM: To measure, describe and investigate potential predictors of early developmental progress in urban Aboriginal infants. METHODS: The Gudaga study is a longitudinal birth cohort study of urban Aboriginal infants. At 12 months 134 infants were assessed using the Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS). The infants' developmental progress was compared with standardised norms. RESULTS: Total scores for the Aboriginal infants for the GMDS were significantly lower than the standards (mean difference (MD) =-4.7, P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): -6.37, -2.96). The difference was small and not clinically significant. Infant performance on the locomotor scale was equivalent to the standards; however, their performance was significantly lower on all other subscales. Reported problem alcohol use at home was the only factor found to be negatively correlated with developmental progress (MD =-7.8, P= 0.01; 95% CI: -13.9, -1.8). The presence of three or more risk factors was also found to be associated with lower developmental scores (MD =-5.4, P= 0.01; 95% CI: -9.6, -1.3). CONCLUSION: This study shows that urban Aboriginal infants are mostly developing within the normal range at 12 months. The lower scores overall compared with standards indicate that differences in development appear early in Aboriginal children and this supports the case for early intervention. The association with exposure to problem drinking and the effect of cumulative family stress may be useful in designing screening tools and interventions.
AIM: To measure, describe and investigate potential predictors of early developmental progress in urban Aboriginal infants. METHODS: The Gudaga study is a longitudinal birth cohort study of urban Aboriginal infants. At 12 months 134 infants were assessed using the Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS). The infants' developmental progress was compared with standardised norms. RESULTS: Total scores for the Aboriginal infants for the GMDS were significantly lower than the standards (mean difference (MD) =-4.7, P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): -6.37, -2.96). The difference was small and not clinically significant. Infant performance on the locomotor scale was equivalent to the standards; however, their performance was significantly lower on all other subscales. Reported problem alcohol use at home was the only factor found to be negatively correlated with developmental progress (MD =-7.8, P= 0.01; 95% CI: -13.9, -1.8). The presence of three or more risk factors was also found to be associated with lower developmental scores (MD =-5.4, P= 0.01; 95% CI: -9.6, -1.3). CONCLUSION: This study shows that urban Aboriginal infants are mostly developing within the normal range at 12 months. The lower scores overall compared with standards indicate that differences in development appear early in Aboriginal children and this supports the case for early intervention. The association with exposure to problem drinking and the effect of cumulative family stress may be useful in designing screening tools and interventions.
Authors: Anna Green; Michelle DiGiacomo; Tim Luckett; Penelope Abbott; Patricia Mary Davidson; Joanne Delaney; Patricia Delaney Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2014-12-18
Authors: Susan Woolfenden; Valsamma Eapen; Emma Axelsson; Alexandra Hendry; Bin Jalaludin; Cheryl Dissanayake; Bronwyn Overs; Joseph Descallar; John Eastwood; Stewart Einfeld; Natalie Silove; Kate Short; Deborah Beasley; Rudi Črnčec; Elisabeth Murphy; Katrina Williams Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Elizabeth M Westrupp; Fabrizio D'Esposito; Jane Freemantle; Fiona K Mensah; Jan M Nicholson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Susan Woolfenden; Valsamma Eapen; Bin Jalaludin; Andrew Hayen; Lynn Kemp; Cheryl Dissanyake; Alexandra Hendry; Emma Axelsson; Bronwyn Overs; John Eastwood; Rudi Črnčec; Anne McKenzie; Deborah Beasley; Elisabeth Murphy; Katrina Williams Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 2.692