Literature DB >> 2147025

Differential recognition of ultraviolet lesions by RecA protein. Possible mechanism for preferential targeting of SOS mutagenesis to (6-4) dipyrimidine sites.

M Rosenberg1, H Echols.   

Abstract

A knowledge of the biochemical basis for UV-induced mutagenesis requires an understanding of the interaction of SOS-activated proteins with DNA polymerase at the replication-blocking dipyrimidine lesions. We have suggested previously that the presence of RecA in this multiprotein complex might be an important feature of induced mutagenesis because RecA associates preferentially with UV-irradiated double-stranded DNA compared to nonirradiated DNA. Previous work by others has indicated that (6-4) dipyrimidine lesions might be more mutagenic than the more common cyclobutane dimer. We have explored the possibility that RecA associates more efficiently with (6-4) lesions than with cyclobutane lesions. We have found that RecA binds DNA with (6-4) lesions much more efficiently than DNA with solely cyclobutane lesions. The distinction between substrates is probably achieved by differential nucleation of the RecA nucleoprotein filament. To investigate the structural basis for differential binding of RecA, we have estimated the unwinding of duplex DNA introduced by (6-4) and cyclobutane lesions. Our data indicate that (6-4) lesions introduce much greater distortion than cyclobutane dimers. We conclude that RecA probably binds preferentially at sites of (6-4) lesions in DNA and that this localization of RecA might target the mutagenic response more frequently to those sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2147025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  9 in total

1.  Thermodynamic and base-pairing studies of matched and mismatched DNA dodecamer duplexes containing cis-syn, (6-4) and Dewar photoproducts of TT.

Authors:  Y Jing; J F Kao; J S Taylor
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  In vivo stability of the Umu mutagenesis proteins: a major role for RecA.

Authors:  E G Frank; M Gonzalez; D G Ennis; A S Levine; R Woodgate
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  DNA-pairing and annealing processes in homologous recombination and homology-directed repair.

Authors:  Scott W Morrical
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Regression of replication forks stalled by leading-strand template damage: II. Regression by RecA is inhibited by SSB.

Authors:  Sankalp Gupta; Joseph T P Yeeles; Kenneth J Marians
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The isfA mutation inhibits mutator activity and processing of UmuD protein in Escherichia coli recA730 strains.

Authors:  A Bebenek; I Pietrzykowska
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1996-04-10

6.  Targeting of the UmuD, UmuD', and MucA' mutagenesis proteins to DNA by RecA protein.

Authors:  E G Frank; J Hauser; A S Levine; R Woodgate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The enhanced mutagenic potential of the MucAB proteins correlates with the highly efficient processing of the MucA protein.

Authors:  J Hauser; A S Levine; D G Ennis; K M Chumakov; R Woodgate
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Torque-limited RecA polymerization on dsDNA.

Authors:  Thijn van der Heijden; John van Noort; Hendrikje van Leest; Roland Kanaar; Claire Wyman; Nynke H Dekker; Nynke Dekker; Cees Dekker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  DNA Helicase-SSB Interactions Critical to the Regression and Restart of Stalled DNA Replication forks in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Piero R Bianco
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 4.141

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.