Literature DB >> 21470084

Burning daylight: balancing vitamin D requirements with sensible sun exposure.

Kellie L Stalgis-Bilinski1, John Boyages, Elizabeth L Salisbury, Colin R Dunstan, Stuart I Henderson, Peter L Talbot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility of balancing sunlight exposure to meet vitamin D requirements with sun protection guidelines. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We used standard erythemal dose and Ultraviolet Index (UVI) data for 1 June 1996 to 30 December 2005 for seven Australian cities to estimate duration of sun exposure required for fair-skinned individuals to synthesise 1000 IU (25 µg) of vitamin D, with 11% and 17% body exposure, for each season and hour of the day. Periods were classified according to whether the UVI was < 3 or ≥ 3 (when sun protection measures are recommended), and whether required duration of exposure was ≤ 30 min, 31-60 min, or > 60 min. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Duration of sunlight exposure required to achieve 1000 IU of vitamin D synthesis.
RESULTS: Duration of sunlight exposure required to synthesise 1000 IU of vitamin D varied by time of day, season and city. Although peak UVI periods are typically promoted as between 10 am and 3 pm, UVI was often ≥ 3 before 10 am or after 3 pm. When the UVI was < 3, there were few opportunities to synthesise 1000 IU of vitamin D within 30 min, with either 11% or 17% body exposure.
CONCLUSION: There is a delicate line between balancing the beneficial effects of sunlight exposure while avoiding its damaging effects. Physiological and geographical factors may reduce vitamin D synthesis, and supplementation may be necessary to achieve adequate vitamin D status for individuals at risk of deficiency. ©The Medical Journal of Australia 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21470084     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03003.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of the feasibility of using sunlight exposure to obtain the recommended level of vitamin D in Canada.

Authors:  Pavandeep Gill; Sunil Kalia
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-07-17

Review 2.  Latitude, sunlight, vitamin D, and childhood food allergy/anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Raymond James Mullins; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Sun exposure and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels in a community sample: Quantifying the association with electronic dosimeters.

Authors:  Robert K R Scragg; Alistair W Stewart; Richard L McKenzie; Anthony I Reeder; J Ben Liley; Martin W Allen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 4.  Ultraviolet radiation and effects on humans: the paradigm of maternal vitamin D production during pregnancy.

Authors:  A Anastasiou; S N Karras; A Bais; W B Grant; K Kotsa; D G Goulis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Daily Versus Depot Vitamin D3 Therapy in 0-16-Year-Old Newly Settled Refugees in Western Australia Over a Period of 40 Weeks.

Authors:  Ushma Wadia; Wayne Soon; Paola Chivers; Aesen Thambiran; David Burgner; Sarah Cherian; Aris Siafarikas
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Make vitamin D while the sun shines, take supplements when it doesn't: a longitudinal, observational study of older adults in Tasmania, Australia.

Authors:  Jane K Pittaway; Kiran D K Ahuja; Jeffrey M Beckett; Marie-Louise Bird; Iain K Robertson; Madeleine J Ball
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Vitamin d supplementation in australia: implications for the development of supplementation guidelines.

Authors:  Kellie Bilinski; Peter Talbot
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2014-08-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.