Literature DB >> 21470050

Ankle sprains: patient perceptions of function and performance of physical tasks. A mixed methods approach.

Peter J Larmer1, Peter J McNair, Liz Smythe, Maynard Williams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate patient's perceptions of function and performance of physical tasks after discharge from treatment for an ankle sprain.
METHODS: Using a mixed methods approach, 40 participants who presented with an acute sprained ankle and their treating clinicians completed two questionnaires related to function at the start and end of a rehabilitation programme. Additionally, participants completed the questionnaires at 6 weeks following discharge at which time they also performed physical tasks that were still perceived as difficult. Ten participants also completed a semi-structured interview.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the participant's and clinician's initial assessment of function. However, at discharge participants scored their function significantly (p < 0.05) lower than clinicians. This difference was not apparent 6 weeks later (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference (p  < 0.05) following actual performance of tasks with an effect size of 1.58. Participant interviews confirmed that patients had a fear of re-injury until they actually performed tasks that were perceived as difficult.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and participants do not have a similar perception of the recovery of an ankle sprain at discharge. Performing tasks which were perceived as difficult were valuable in assisting participants gain an improved appreciation of their function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21470050     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.568668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  6 in total

Review 1.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: conservative management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes.

Authors:  Thomas W Kaminski; Jay Hertel; Ned Amendola; Carrie L Docherty; Michael G Dolan; J Ty Hopkins; Eric Nussbaum; Wendy Poppy; Doug Richie
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Developing a framework for ankle function: a delphi study.

Authors:  Kelli R Snyder; Todd A Evans; Peter J Neibert
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Bruno Tassignon; Jo Verschueren; Eamonn Delahunt; Michelle Smith; Bill Vicenzino; Evert Verhagen; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Acute ankle sprain in athletes: Clinical aspects and algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Farzin Halabchi; Mohammad Hassabi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-18

5.  Differences in gait characteristics between total hip, knee, and ankle arthroplasty patients: a six-month postoperative comparison.

Authors:  Nicola C Casartelli; Julia F Item-Glatthorn; Mario Bizzini; Michael Leunig; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Intrinsic factors associated with return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cheryl A Ross; Amanda Clifford; Quinette A Louw
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2015-06-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.