Literature DB >> 21469529

Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: a driving simulator investigation.

Paul Atchley1, Mark Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the nature of concurrent task interference during a vigilance task and to determine whether a concurrent task improves performance with decreased vigilance.
BACKGROUND: Research has repeatedly shown that engaging in a cell phone conversation while driving increases the risk of getting into crashes. At the same time, it has also been found that task monotony could lead to an increase in crash risk. There is evidence that suggests that engaging in a concurrent task reduces the effects of monotony, leading to an improvement in vigilance task performance.
METHOD: A monotonous drive in a driving simulator was used to investigate the effects of a concurrent verbal task. Three task conditions were used: no verbal task, continuous verbal task, and late verbal task.
RESULTS: When engaged in a secondary verbal task, drivers showed improved lane-keeping performance and steering control when vigilance was lowest.
CONCLUSION: A strategically placed concurrent task can improve performance when vigilance is at its lowest. APPLICATION: There is potential for the design of a countermeasure system that can be strategically activated by an automated system monitoring driver performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21469529     DOI: 10.1177/0018720810391215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  10 in total

1.  Driving after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of distraction and executive functioning.

Authors:  Megan E Narad; Patrick Nalepka; Aimee E Miley; Dean W Beebe; Brad G Kurowski; Shari L Wade
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-06-11

Review 2.  Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alva O Ferdinand; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Impact of distraction on the driving performance of adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Megan Narad; Annie A Garner; Anne A Brassell; Dyani Saxby; Tanya N Antonini; Kathleen M O'Brien; Leanne Tamm; Gerald Matthews; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Driving and Multitasking: The Good, the Bad, and the Dangerous.

Authors:  Menno Nijboer; Jelmer P Borst; Hedderik van Rijn; Niels A Taatgen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-08

5.  The Shape of a Vehicle Windshield Affects Reaction Time and Brain Activity During a Target Detection Task.

Authors:  Takafumi Sasaoka; Maro G Machizawa; Yoshihisa Okamoto; Koji Iwase; Toshihiro Yoshida; Nanae Michida; Atsuhide Kishi; Masaki Chiba; Kazuo Nishikawa; Shigeto Yamawaki; Takahide Nouzawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  The Influence of Different Auditory Stimuli on Attentiveness and Responsiveness in Road Traffic in Simulated Traffic Situations.

Authors:  Wolfgang Welz; Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht; Christian Große-Siestrup; Geraldine Preuß
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Mobile Phone Use "on the Road": A Self-Report Study on Young Drivers.

Authors:  Angelo Fraschetti; Pierluigi Cordellieri; Giulia Lausi; Emanuela Mari; Elena Paoli; Jessica Burrai; Alessandro Quaglieri; Michela Baldi; Alessandra Pizzo; Anna Maria Giannini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 8.  Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.

Authors:  Răzvan Gabriel Boboc; Gheorghe Daniel Voinea; Ioana-Diana Buzdugan; Csaba Antonya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Multi-modal demands of a smartphone used to place calls and enter addresses during highway driving relative to two embedded systems.

Authors:  Bryan Reimer; Bruce Mehler; Ian Reagan; David Kidd; Jonathan Dobres
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Effects of a Motion Seat System on Driver's Passive Task-Related Fatigue: An On-Road Driving Study.

Authors:  Seunghoon Lee; Minjae Kim; Hayoung Jung; Dohoon Kwon; Sunwoo Choi; Heecheon You
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.