| Literature DB >> 21468688 |
Alida C Weidenaar1, Arja ter Elst, Gineke Koopmans-Klein, Stefano Rosati, Wilfred F A den Dunnen, Tiny Meeuwsen-de Boer, Willem A Kamps, Edo Vellenga, Eveline S J M de Bont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) bone marrow biopsies at diagnosis display enhanced angiogenesis and increased VEGFA expression. In a xenograft mouse model it was described that availability of free VEGFA versus bound VEGFA is related to different vascular morphology. In this study we investigate the relationship between vascular morphology within AML bone marrow biopsies and AML derived VEGFA levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21468688 PMCID: PMC3162634 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-011-0017-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) ISSN: 2211-3428 Impact factor: 6.730
Patient characteristics
| Characteristic | AML patients | Normal bone marrow | AML remission |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | 32 | 32 | 8 |
| Age at diagnosis, y | 54 (20–73) | 58 (17–83) | 48 (20–64) |
| Sex, male/female | 17/15 | 17/15 | 4/4 |
| White blood cell count (x 109/L) | 28 (8–269) | ||
| Peripheral blasts (%) | 62 (3–97) | ||
| Platelets (x 109/L) | 48.7 (1.1–241.0) | ||
| Cytogenetics, n (%) | |||
| Favorable | 2 (6) | ||
| Intermediate | 18 (56) | ||
| Unfavorable | 4 (13) | ||
| Not available | 8 (25) | ||
| SCT | |||
| No SCT | 22 | ||
| Allogeneic SCT | 7 | ||
| Autologous SCT | 3 | ||
| Cycles to CR, n (%) | |||
| 1 | 13 (41) | ||
| 2 | 9 (28) | ||
| 3 | 2 (6) | ||
| No CR | 8 (25) | ||
| Relapse, n (%) | 18 (56) | ||
| Dead/alive | 24/8 | ||
| Staining | |||
| Vessel count, n (%) | 32 (100) | 32 (100) | 8 (100) |
| counts | 16.2 (5.8–33.8) | 7.4 (2.0–15.0) | 5.7 (1.0–9.8) |
| Chalkley count, n (%) | 32 (100) | 32 (100) | 8 (100) |
| counts | 5.4 (3.2–11.0) | 5.3 (3.3–10.3) | 7.5 (6.0–10.0) |
| %CTIV-positive vessels, n (%) | 29 (91) | 28 (88) | 7 (88) |
| counts | 87.3 (2.0–100.0) | 100.0 (0.0–100.0) | 61.2 (0.0–100.0) |
| %SMA-positive vessels, n (%) | 26 (81) | 31 (97) | 8 (100) |
| counts | 35.0 (8.9–100.0) | 73.1 (22.7–100.0) | 54.9 (18.4–100.0) |
| VEGFA, n (%) | 32 (100) | 13 (41) | 8 (100) |
Characteristics—age, WBC, percentage peripheral blasts and platelets— and staining counts are given as median (range)
Fig. 1Bone marrow vessel count and pericyte coverage in AML (a) Boxplot of vessel count in AML bone marrow compared with normal bone marrow and AML remission. Vessel count in bone marrow biopsies of AML patients is significantly (p < 0.001) higher than in NBM or AML remission group. Median values are represented by a bar in the boxplot. (b) Boxplot of percentage SMA-positive vessels in bone marrow biopsies of newly diagnosed AML patients, normal controls and AML patients in remission. Pericyte coverage is significantly (p < 0.001) lower in bone marrow biopsies of AML patients at diagnosis. Median values are represented by a bar in the boxplot
Fig. 2Morphology patterns in AML bone marrow biopsies. Dilated vessels in panel a and sprouting vessels in panel b. Representative pictures of bone marrow immunohistochemistry for FVIII, CTIV and VEGFA (×400)
Fig. 3Scatterplot representing the biopsies of AML at diagnosis, at remission and Normal Bone Marrow. AML biopsies at diagnosis with a ‘low vessel count’ are displayed below the Y-axis reference line (13 microvessels/hpf), based on the fact that >95% of Normal Bone Marrow and AML remission biopsies had a vessel count below 13 microvessels/hpf. The X-axis reference line divides AML biopsies at diagnosis with a ‘high vessel count’ into two subgroups according to the median Chalkley count of 5.4 in AML at diagnosis and the identical cut-off point set by the median Chalkley count of the NBM and AML remission biopsies. Samples with a Chalkley count >5.4 were defined as ‘vessel hyperplasia’ (group I) and samples ≤5.4 as ‘angiogenic sprouting’ (group II). AML biopsies: Spearman’s rho 0.15, p = 0.42
Fig. 4Relation between AML derived VEGFA protein levels and vessel morphology in AML at diagnosis. The AML-excreted VEGFA protein level was significantly (p = 0.007) higher in the subgroup with a ‘vessel hyperplasia’ morphology compared with the’angiogenic sprouting’ or the ‘low angiogenic profile’. Box-and-whisker plot limits depict 75th and 25th percentiles and median value (box), and upper/lower quantile ± 1.5 × (interquantile range) (upper and lower whiskers, respectively)