J Montonen1, H Boeing, E Schleicher, A Fritsche, T Pischon. 1. Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany. jukka.montonen@dife.de
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of our study was to investigate whether changes in BMI during earlier adulthood are more strongly associated with levels of circulating obesity biomarkers in middle age than are BMI changes during later adulthood. METHODS: The study included 1,612 participants from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. The associations of BMI changes based on recalled BMI for the age ranges 25-40 years (earlier adulthood) and 40-55 years (later adulthood) with later biomarker levels were compared using a linear model, adjusted for BMI at age 25 years and conventional risk factors. RESULTS: BMI changes during both time periods as well as BMI at age 25 years were significantly associated with circulating levels of adiponectin, γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) in both sexes, and of HbA(1c) in women. However, BMI gain for the age range 25-40 years was significantly more strongly associated with unfavourable levels of adiponectin, hs-CRP, HDL-C and HbA(1c) in men and women, and of GGT and ALT in men (p difference <0.05) than BMI gain for the age range 40-55 years. The percentage change in biomarker levels per unit gain in BMI for the age range 25-40 years ranged from 0.81% (HbA(1c)) to 9.80% (hs-CRP) in men, and from 0.75% (HbA(1c)) to 14.7% (hs-CRP) in women, whereas for the age range 40-55 years, values ranged from -0.15% to 4.82% in men and from 0.25% to 7.06% in women. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The results support the hypothesis that an increase in BMI in earlier adulthood is more strongly associated with unfavourable circulating levels of obesity biomarkers later in life than is an increase in BMI in later adulthood.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of our study was to investigate whether changes in BMI during earlier adulthood are more strongly associated with levels of circulating obesity biomarkers in middle age than are BMI changes during later adulthood. METHODS: The study included 1,612 participants from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. The associations of BMI changes based on recalled BMI for the age ranges 25-40 years (earlier adulthood) and 40-55 years (later adulthood) with later biomarker levels were compared using a linear model, adjusted for BMI at age 25 years and conventional risk factors. RESULTS: BMI changes during both time periods as well as BMI at age 25 years were significantly associated with circulating levels of adiponectin, γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) in both sexes, and of HbA(1c) in women. However, BMI gain for the age range 25-40 years was significantly more strongly associated with unfavourable levels of adiponectin, hs-CRP, HDL-C and HbA(1c) in men and women, and of GGT and ALT in men (p difference <0.05) than BMI gain for the age range 40-55 years. The percentage change in biomarker levels per unit gain in BMI for the age range 25-40 years ranged from 0.81% (HbA(1c)) to 9.80% (hs-CRP) in men, and from 0.75% (HbA(1c)) to 14.7% (hs-CRP) in women, whereas for the age range 40-55 years, values ranged from -0.15% to 4.82% in men and from 0.25% to 7.06% in women. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The results support the hypothesis that an increase in BMI in earlier adulthood is more strongly associated with unfavourable circulating levels of obesity biomarkers later in life than is an increase in BMI in later adulthood.
Authors: W K Al-Delaimy; E H J M Jansen; P H M Peeters; J D van der Laan; P A H van Noord; H C Boshuizen; Y T van der Schouw; M Jenab; P Ferrari; H B Bueno-de-Mesquita Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Joachim Spranger; Anja Kroke; Matthias Möhlig; Manuela M Bergmann; Michael Ristow; Heiner Boeing; Andreas F H Pfeiffer Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-01-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: E Riboli; K J Hunt; N Slimani; P Ferrari; T Norat; M Fahey; U R Charrondière; B Hémon; C Casagrande; J Vignat; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiébaut; J Wahrendorf; H Boeing; D Trichopoulos; A Trichopoulou; P Vineis; D Palli; H B Bueno-De-Mesquita; P H M Peeters; E Lund; D Engeset; C A González; A Barricarte; G Berglund; G Hallmans; N E Day; T J Key; R Kaaks; R Saracci Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Bianca L De Stavola; Dorothea Nitsch; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack; Rebecca Hardy; Vera Mann; Tim J Cole; Susan Morton; David A Leon Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-11-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Joshua Petimar; Fred K Tabung; Linda Valeri; Bernard Rosner; Andrew T Chan; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 7.316
Authors: Lisa B VanWagner; Sadiya S Khan; Hongyan Ning; Juned Siddique; Cora E Lewis; John J Carr; Miriam B Vos; Elizabeth Speliotes; Norah A Terrault; Mary E Rinella; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Norrina B Allen Journal: Liver Int Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 8.754
Authors: Yoon Jung Kim; Yo Han Lee; Yun Jeong Lee; Kyeong Jin Kim; Jee Hyun An; Nam Hoon Kim; Hee Young Kim; Dong Seop Choi; Sin Gon Kim Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.692