Literature DB >> 21468072

For EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses, bigger is not always better.

Uzma D Siddiqui, Harry R Aslanian.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21468072     DOI： 10.1038/ajg.2010.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN： 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kajsa E Affolter; Robert L Schmidt; Anna P Matynia; Douglas G Adler; Rachel E Factor
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Clinical controversies in endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Arvind J Trindade; Tyler M Berzin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2013-04-19

3.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy with 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles for the "precision medicine" of pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Naohiko Yoshizawa; Reiko Yamada; Takashi Sakuno; Hiroyuki Inoue; Hiroshi Miura; Toshifumi Takeuchi; Misaki Nakamura; Yasuhiko Hamada; Masaki Katsurahara; Kyosuke Tanaka; Noriyuki Horiki; Yoshiyuki Takei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.