Literature DB >> 21467947

In vivo detection of choline in ovarian tumors using 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Anastassia Esseridou1, Giovanni Di Leo, Luca M Sconfienza, Valentina Caldiera, Francesco Raspagliesi, Barbara Grijuela, Francesco Hanozet, Franca Podo, Francesco Sardanelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical feasibility of 3-dimensional (3D) proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of ovarian masses at 1.5 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 16 patients with 23 ovarian masses using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 3D chemical shift imaging MRS (time of reception/time of echo = 700/135 ms, number of excitations = 6, interpolated voxel = 5 × 5 × 5 mm(3), water and fat suppression). Spectral editing consisted of water reference, filtering, zero-filling, Fourier transformation, frequency shift, automatic baseline and phase correction, and curve fitting. The volume of interest was placed to encompass both solid and cystic tumor components as well as apparently healthy pelvic tissues. The presence of a choline peak at 3.14 to 3.34 ppm was considered as a marker of malignancy. All patients underwent surgery and histopathological evaluation.
RESULTS: Of 23 masses, 19 were malignant and the remaining 4 benign lesions were a fibrothecoma, an endometriosis, a cyst, and a cystadenofibroma. A choline peak was detected in 17/19 malignant tumors (sensitivity 89%), absent in 2 G1 tumors. It was visible in 16 solid components of 19 malignant tumors (in one of them, a choline peak was detected only in the cystic component, in 6 in both solid and cystic components). The choline peak was absent in 20/21 apparently healthy pelvic tissues, with a very low choline peak being detected in one intraperitoneal fluid collection with malignant cells at cytologic analysis; 3/4 benign tumors showed a choline peak (overall specificity 21/25 = 84%). A significant difference between the mean choline peak integral detected within the solid component and that within the cystic component was observed (P = 0.002). No correlation between the choline peak integral and the tumor size was found (r = 0.120, P = 0.615).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D MRS of ovarian masses is clinically feasible at 1.5 T. This opens new research strategies for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21467947     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821690ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  10 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Imaging of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Sai Kiran Sharma; Brandon Nemieboka; Evis Sala; Jason S Lewis; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Proton MR spectroscopy and the detection of malignancy in ovarian masses.

Authors:  Sahar Mahmoud Mansour; Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed Gomma; Peter Nashaat Shafik
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  In vivo Magnetic Resonance Metabolic and Morphofunctional Fingerprints in Experimental Models of Human Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rossella Canese; Delia Mezzanzanica; Marina Bagnoli; Stefano Indraccolo; Silvana Canevari; Franca Podo; Egidio Iorio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Activation of Phosphatidylcholine-Specific Phospholipase C in Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Impact on MRS-Detected Choline Metabolic Profile and Perspectives for Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Luisa Paris; Serena Cecchetti; Francesca Spadaro; Laura Abalsamo; Carlo Ramoni; Alessandro Ricci; Maria Elena Pisanu; Francesco Sardanelli; Rossella Canese; Egidio Iorio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Ovarian Cancer Targeted Theranostics.

Authors:  Sridhar Nimmagadda; Marie-France Penet
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  A novel roadmap connecting the 1H-MRS total choline resonance to all hallmarks of cancer following targeted therapy.

Authors:  Egidio Iorio; Franca Podo; Martin O Leach; Jason Koutcher; Francis G Blankenberg; Joseph F Norfray
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-01-15

7.  In vivo detection of dysregulated choline metabolism in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancers with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Ying Li; Yong Ai Li; Li Wang; An Rong Zeng; Xiao Liang Ma; Jin Wei Qiang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 8.  Phosphatidylcholine-Derived Lipid Mediators: The Crosstalk Between Cancer Cells and Immune Cells.

Authors:  Renata de Freitas Saito; Luciana Nogueira de Sousa Andrade; Silvina Odete Bustos; Roger Chammas
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  [99mTc]Tc-DTPA-Bis(cholineethylamine) as an Oncologic Tracer for the Detection of Choline Transporter (ChT) and Choline Kinase (ChK) Expression in Cancer.

Authors:  Ambika Parmar Jaswal; Puja Panwar Hazari; Surbhi Prakash; Pallavi Sethi; Aruna Kaushik; Bal G Roy; Swati Kathait; Baljinder Singh; Anil Kumar Mishra
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-08

10.  Metabonomic analysis of ovarian tumour cyst fluid by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Michael Kyriakides; Nona Rama; Jasmin Sidhu; Hani Gabra; Hector C Keun; Mona El-Bahrawy
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-02-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.