Literature DB >> 21467568

Increasing power of genome-wide association studies by collecting additional single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Emrah Kostem1, Jose A Lozano, Eleazar Eskin.   

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been effectively identifying the genomic regions associated with a disease trait. In a typical GWAS, an informative subset of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), called tag SNPs, is genotyped in case/control individuals. Once the tag SNP statistics are computed, the genomic regions that are in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the most significantly associated tag SNPs are believed to contain the causal polymorphisms. However, such LD regions are often large and contain many additional polymorphisms. Following up all the SNPs included in these regions is costly and infeasible for biological validation. In this article we address how to characterize these regions cost effectively with the goal of providing investigators a clear direction for biological validation. We introduce a follow-up study approach for identifying all untyped associated SNPs by selecting additional SNPs, called follow-up SNPs, from the associated regions and genotyping them in the original case/control individuals. We introduce a novel SNP selection method with the goal of maximizing the number of associated SNPs among the chosen follow-up SNPs. We show how the observed statistics of the original tag SNPs and human genetic variation reference data such as the HapMap Project can be utilized to identify the follow-up SNPs. We use simulated and real association studies based on the HapMap data and the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium to demonstrate that our method shows superior performance to the correlation- and distance-based traditional follow-up SNP selection approaches. Our method is publicly available at http://genetics.cs.ucla.edu/followupSNPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21467568      PMCID: PMC3122306          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.128595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  18 in total

1.  Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Christopher S Carlson; Michael A Eberle; Mark J Rieder; Qian Yi; Leonid Kruglyak; Deborah A Nickerson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Finding haplotype tagging SNPs by use of principal components analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Lin; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Tag SNP selection for association studies.

Authors:  Daniel O Stram
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Association studies in candidate genes: strategies to select SNPs to be tested.

Authors:  E Cousin; E Genin; S Mace; S Ricard; C Chansac; M del Zompo; J F Deleuze
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Multi-marker tagging single nucleotide polymorphism selection using estimation of distribution algorithms.

Authors:  Roberto Santana; Alexander Mendiburu; Noah Zaitlen; Eleazar Eskin; Jose A Lozano
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Tag SNP selection in genotype data for maximizing SNP prediction accuracy.

Authors:  Eran Halperin; Gad Kimmel; Ron Shamir
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; David Altshuler; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Richard A Gibbs; Matt E Hurles; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Rapid and accurate multiple testing correction and power estimation for millions of correlated markers.

Authors:  Buhm Han; Hyun Min Kang; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  13 in total

1.  Efficiently identifying significant associations in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Emrah Kostem; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Gene-Gene Interactions Detection Using a Two-stage Model.

Authors:  Zhanyong Wang; Jae Hoon Sul; Sagi Snir; Jose A Lozano; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  DISSCO: direct imputation of summary statistics allowing covariates.

Authors:  Zheng Xu; Qing Duan; Song Yan; Wei Chen; Mingyao Li; Ethan Lange; Yun Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Colocalization of GWAS and eQTL Signals Detects Target Genes.

Authors:  Farhad Hormozdiari; Martijn van de Bunt; Ayellet V Segrè; Xiao Li; Jong Wha J Joo; Michael Bilow; Jae Hoon Sul; Sriram Sankararaman; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Widespread Allelic Heterogeneity in Complex Traits.

Authors:  Farhad Hormozdiari; Anthony Zhu; Gleb Kichaev; Chelsea J-T Ju; Ayellet V Segrè; Jong Wha J Joo; Hyejung Won; Sriram Sankararaman; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Sagiv Shifman; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Improving Imputation Accuracy by Inferring Causal Variants in Genetic Studies.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Farhad Hormozdiari; Jong Wha J Joo; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  A Unifying Framework for Imputing Summary Statistics in Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Eleazar Eskin; Sriram Sankararaman
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 8.  Dissecting the genetics of complex traits using summary association statistics.

Authors:  Bogdan Pasaniuc; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Pathway-guided identification of gene-gene interactions.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Daowen Zhang; Jung-Ying Tzeng
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  Enhanced methods to detect haplotypic effects on gene expression.

Authors:  Robert Brown; Gleb Kichaev; Nicholas Mancuso; James Boocock; Bogdan Pasaniuc
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.