| Literature DB >> 21465264 |
Paulina Borkowska1, Krzysztof Kucia, Szymon Rzezniczek, Monika Paul-Samojedny, Malgorzata Kowalczyk, Aleksander Owczarek, Renata Suchanek, Tomasz Medrala, Jan Kowalski.
Abstract
To elucidate a genetic predisposition to major depressive disorder, we investigated two polymorphisms (-31T/C and -511C/T) in the interleukin-1beta promoter region in patients who suffered from major recurrent depression. The aim of the current work was to compare alleles and genotype layout between patients with major recurrent depression and healthy people. We would like to indicate such combination of genotypes which corresponds with major recurrent depression. Correlations between genotypes for analyzed polymorphisms and number of episodes, number of points in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and age of onset were investigated as well. The study group consisted of 94 patients diagnosed with major recurrent depression. The control group included 206 healthy individuals. Both groups involved representatives of Caucasian population. Genotyping of polymorphisms was performed by using PCR-RFLP technique. A specific haplotype, composed of the C allele at -31 and the T allele at -511, has a tendency to have a statistically significant difference (p = 0.064) between patients and control group. Correspondence analysis revealed that genotype T/T at -31 and genotype C/C at -511 are associated with major recurrent depression. No association was found between genotypes for studied polymorphic sites and number of episodes, number of points in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and age of onset.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21465264 PMCID: PMC3076565 DOI: 10.1007/s12031-011-9507-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Neurosci ISSN: 0895-8696 Impact factor: 3.444
Genotypes and allele frequencies in the patient and control groups
| Case | Controls |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −31T/C | Genotypes | C/C | 8 (8.5) | 29 (14) | 3.11 | 0.2111 |
| T/C | 58 (61.7) | 131 (63.7) | ||||
| T/T | 28 (29.8) | 46 (22.3) | ||||
| Alleles | T | 114 (60.7) | 223 (54) | 2.22 | 0.1362 | |
| C | 74 (39.3) | 189 (46) | ||||
| −511C/T | Genotypes | C/C | 42 (44.7) | 76 (36.9) | 1.84 | 0.3985 |
| C/T | 49 (52) | 120 (58.3) | ||||
| T/T | 3 (3.3) | 10 (4.8) | ||||
| Alleles | T | 55 (293) | 140 (34) | 1.31 | 0.2524 | |
| C | 133 (70.7) | 272 (66) |
Haplotype frequencies in the patient and control groups
| −31T/C | −511C/T | Frequency | Depression | Control | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | 0.4940 | 0.5428 | 0.4712 | 1.00 | |
| C | T | 0.2573 | 0.2290 | 0.2697 | 1.66 (0.97–2.85) | 0.0640 |
| C | C | 0.1810 | 0.1646 | 0.1890 | 1.45 (0.85–2.45) | 0.1700 |
| T | T | 0.0677 | 0.0636 | 0.0701 | 1.41 (0.60–3.31) | 0.4300 |
Fig. 1Results of correspondence analysis. Dashed regions show clusters yielded with hierarchical agglomeration with the Ward’s method and the Euclidean distance. D major recurrent depression, C control