Literature DB >> 21465158

Is phytoremediation a sustainable and reliable approach to clean-up contaminated water and soil in Alpine areas?

Jean-Paul Schwitzguébel1, Elena Comino, Nadia Plata, Mohammadali Khalvati.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM AND SCOPE: Phytoremediation does exploit natural plant physiological processes and can be used to decontaminate agricultural soils, industrial sites, brownfields, sediments and water containing inorganic and organic pollutants or to improve food chain safety by phytostabilisation of toxic elements. It is a low-cost and environment friendly technology targetting removal, degradation or immobilisation of contaminants. The aim of the present review is to highlight some recent advances in phytoremediation in the Alpine context. MAIN FEATURES: Case studies are presented where phytoremediation has been or can be successfully applied in Alpine areas to: (1) clean-up industrial wastewater containing sulphonated aromatic xenobiotics released by dye and textile industries; (2) remediate agricultural soils polluted by petroleum hydrocarbons; (3) improve food chain safety in soils contaminated with toxic trace elements (As, Co, Cr and Pb); and (4) treat soils impacted by modern agricultural activities with a special emphasis on phosphate fertilisation. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: Worlwide, including in Alpine areas, the controlled use of appropriate plants is destined to play a major role for remediation and restoration of polluted and degraded ecosystems, monitoring and assessment of environmental quality, prevention of landscape degradation and immobilisation of trace elements. Phytotechnologies do already offer promising approaches towards environmental remediation, human health, food safety and sustainable development for the 21st century in Alpine areas and elsewhere all over the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21465158     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0498-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  55 in total

Review 1.  Sulphonated aromatic pollutants. Limits of microbial degradability and potential of phytoremediation.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Schwitzguébel; Sylvie Aubert; Wolfgang Grosse; Frank Laturnus
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Assessment of the phytoextraction potential of high biomass crop plants.

Authors:  Javier Hernández-Allica; José M Becerril; Carlos Garbisu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Mobility of metals and metalloids in a multi-element contaminated soil 20 years after cessation of the pollution source activity.

Authors:  Rafael Clemente; Nicholas M Dickinson; Nicholas W Lepp
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Phytoextraction of metals from a multiply contaminated soil by Indian mustard.

Authors:  M F Quartacci; A Argilla; A J M Baker; F Navari-Izzo
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  PHYTOREMEDIATION OF INORGANICS: REALISM AND SYNERGIES.

Authors:  Nicholas M Dickinson; Alan J M Baker; Augustine Doronila; Scott Laidlaw; Roger D Reeves
Journal:  Int J Phytoremediation       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.212

6.  Three year field test of a plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhanced phytoremediation system at a land farm for treatment of hydrocarbon waste.

Authors:  Jolanta Gurska; Wenxi Wang; Karen E Gerhardt; Aaron M Khalid; David M Isherwood; Xiao-Dong Huang; Bernard R Glick; Bruce M Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Stabilization of Pb- and Cu-contaminated soil using coal fly ash and peat.

Authors:  Jurate Kumpiene; Solvita Ore; Anders Lagerkvist; Christian Maurice
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Strategies to use phytoextraction in very acidic soil contaminated by heavy metals.

Authors:  F Pedron; G Petruzzelli; M Barbafieri; E Tassi
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Phytoextraction with Brassica napus L.: a tool for sustainable management of heavy metal contaminated soils.

Authors:  Veerle M J Grispen; Hans J M Nelissen; Jos A C Verkleij
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Search for a plant for phytoremediation--what can we learn from field and hydroponic studies?

Authors:  E Zabłudowska; J Kowalska; L Jedynak; S Wojas; A Skłodowska; D M Antosiewicz
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-09-05       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  4 in total

1.  Possibility of removing cadmium pollution from the environment using a newly synthesized material coal fly ash.

Authors:  Hanghang Zhao; Xunrong Huang; Guibin Zhang; Jingtian Li; Zhenli He; Puhui Ji; Junzhe Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Phytoremediation potential of Pteris vittata L. under the combined contamination of As and Pb: beneficial interaction between As and Pb.

Authors:  Xiao-ming Wan; Mei Lei; Tong-bin Chen; Guang-dong Zhou; Jun Yang; Xiao-yong Zhou; Xi Zhang; Rui-xiang Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Discoloration of indigo carmine using aqueous extracts from vegetables and vegetable residues as enzyme sources.

Authors:  A Solís; F Perea; M Solís; N Manjarrez; H I Pérez; J Cassani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Expression of zinc and cadmium responsive genes in leaves of willow (Salix caprea L.) genotypes with different accumulation characteristics.

Authors:  Cornelia Konlechner; Mine Türktaş; Ingrid Langer; Marek Vaculík; Walter W Wenzel; Markus Puschenreiter; Marie-Theres Hauser
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 8.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.