To what degree juvenile migrant birds are able to correct for orientation errors or wind drift is still largely unknown. We studied the orientation of passerines on the Faroe Islands far off the normal migration routes of European migrants. The ability to compensate for displacement was tested in naturally occurring vagrants presumably displaced by wind and in birds experimentally displaced 1100 km from Denmark to the Faroes. The orientation was studied in orientation cages as well as in the free-flying birds after release by tracking departures using small radio transmitters. Both the naturally displaced and the experimentally displaced birds oriented in more easterly directions on the Faroes than was observed in Denmark prior to displacement. This pattern was even more pronounced in departure directions, perhaps because of wind influence. The clear directional compensation found even in experimentally displaced birds indicates that first-year birds can also possess the ability to correct for displacement in some circumstances, possibly involving either some primitive form of true navigation, or 'sign posts', but the cues used for this are highly speculative. We also found some indications of differences between species in the reaction to displacement. Such differences might be involved in the diversity of results reported in displacement studies so far.
To what degree juvenile migrant birds are able to correct for orientation errors or wind drift is still largely unknown. We studied the orientation of passerines on the Faroe Islands far off the normal migration routes of European migrants. The ability to compensate for displacement was tested in naturally occurring vagrants presumably displaced by wind and in birds experimentally displaced 1100 km from Denmark to the Faroes. The orientation was studied in orientation cages as well as in the free-flying birds after release by tracking departures using small radio transmitters. Both the naturally displaced and the experimentally displaced birds oriented in more easterly directions on the Faroes than was observed in Denmark prior to displacement. This pattern was even more pronounced in departure directions, perhaps because of wind influence. The clear directional compensation found even in experimentally displaced birds indicates that first-year birds can also possess the ability to correct for displacement in some circumstances, possibly involving either some primitive form of true navigation, or 'sign posts', but the cues used for this are highly speculative. We also found some indications of differences between species in the reaction to displacement. Such differences might be involved in the diversity of results reported in displacement studies so far.
There is strong evidence that migratory birds inherit an endogenous directional
programme, steering inexperienced migrants in a certain direction for a certain
period of time [1], [2]. This programme alone does not enable migrants to navigate
toward their unknown species-specific wintering grounds and thus, it does not allow
birds to compensate for a displacement [3]. With experience, this programme
develops into a goal area navigation programme allowing the birds to accurately
pin-point at least their breeding and winter grounds. Why this is so remains poorly
understood [4].
Being able to compensate for displacements would presumably lead to evolutionary
advantages but these have apparently not led to the evolution of such a capability
in young birds, possibly because of evolutionary or mechanistic constraints but also
because juveniles may benefit from a more open strategy.The presumed change from a simple bearing-based orientation to true navigation is
largely unstudied. It is generally assumed that the development of the navigational
system in adult birds, which enables accurate goal navigation, relies on experience
during the first migration [5], [6]. In general, juvenile birds making their first migration
do not show signs of adult navigation after release in experimental displacements
where the compensation requires some form of true navigation [7], [8]. Despite this, there are no
theoretical objections to juvenile migrants being able to correct for displacements:
Juveniles could correct by using experienced-based navigating toward a site already
visited on migration, as birds already on the way on their first migration could be
acquiring information necessary for later navigation.The way the initial programme interacts with and is influenced by external factors
such as wind, topography, habitat etc. is still largely unknown. For example, winds
can exert a strong influence on migrating birds, because wind speeds can easily
reach the endogenous self-propelled flight speed of most birds. A few studies have
indicated an ability at the individual level to compensate for wind displacements
[9], [10], whereas
others have not [11]. In juvenile birds with no prior knowledge of the
migratory route or wintering grounds, the behavioural responses to such
displacements are crucial for the successful arrival at the species-specific
wintering grounds.Here, we study naturally (ie. likely by wind) and experimentally displaced juvenile
birds of nocturnally and solitarily migrating species at the Faroe Islands in the
northeastern Atlantic Ocean far off the normal migration route of European land
birds. So far responses to displacements and especially to external factors have
proven very difficult to study, mainly because of problems in following free-flying
migratory birds [12]. Thus, we applied advanced radio telemetry methods to
efficiently track the movements of departing birds after the displacement to the
Faroe Islands and combined this with the more traditional orientation cage
studies.
Results
Juvenile birds of three long-distance migratory species, experimentally displaced
1100 km from Denmark to the Faroe Islands, shifted their orientation similarly and
in accordance with compensation for the displacement. Before displacement, juvenile
birds tested in Emlen funnels in Denmark were oriented toward southwest
(α = 236°,
r = 0.544,
N = 29, P<0.001, Rayleigh
test; Figure 1b) similar to the
normal migration direction as found from ring recoveries (P>0.7,
Watson-Williams test). After displacement, the orientation in funnels on the Faroes
shifted counter-clockwise toward south-southeast
(α = 168°,
r = 0.516,
N = 25, P<0.001; Figure 1c) significantly different
from the orientation in Denmark before displacement
(N = 29/25,
F
1,52 = 12.88,
P<0.001, WW test). Radio tracking of the displaced birds later
released on the Faroes revealed departure directions that were significantly
different from the orientation before displacement
(N = 29/13,
F
1,40 = 40.18,
P<0.001, WW test) and in even more counter-clockwise shifted
directions toward southeast and east (α = 102°,
r = 0.711,
N = 13, P<0.001; Figure 1d) than in the orientation
cages (N = 25/13,
F
1,36 = 10.01,
P = 0.003, WW test; though the difference
was not significant at level of the individual: α = 2°,
r = 0.415,
N = 11, P>0.05, Confidence
Interval test). This difference between funnel orientation and departure directions
could have been caused by winds, with birds on average departing in westerly
tailwinds and with the average tailwind vector significantly different from random
only when experimentally displaced birds departed (Figure 2). Furthermore, the overall pattern of
headings was similar to that of vanishing bearings and headings were not more
constant. Testing changes in orientation at the individual level also resulted in
very similar results with the orientation after displacement differing significantly
from the orientation in Denmark both for funnel tests and vanishing bearings
(P<0.05 and 0.01, respectively, Confidence Interval test;
Figure
S1). Because of the relatively large scatter, it was not possible to
determine whether orientation back toward the capture site or toward the winter
grounds fitted the data best (Figure S2).
Figure 1
Orientation of juvenile birds displaced to the Faroe Islands.
(a–c) Orientation on the Faroe Islands: (a) in funnels of birds
displaced from Denmark to the Faroe Islands, (b) vanishing bearings of birds
caught on the Faroe Islands, (c) vanishing bearings of birds translocated
from Denmark to the Faroe Islands. (d) Orientation in funnels of birds
caught and tested in Denmark. (e) Map of Northwest Europe showing the
location of the Faroe Islands (red star) and the main migration through
Northwest Europe (grey arrow). The 1100 km displacement from Denmark (green
star) to The Faroes is shown by the thin arrow. In circular diagrams, the
orientation of individual birds is marked on the periphery of the circle and
the mean sample orientation is shown as a black arrow starting in the circle
centre and with its length relative to the radius corresponding to the
length of the mean vector r. 0 corresponds to orientation
toward North. All sample orientations differ significant from random
according to the Rayleigh test (P<0.05).
Figure 2
Strength (m/s) and direction (°) of the wind vector at each departure
from the Faroe Islands of birds caught on the Faroes (a) and in Denmark
(b).
North is zero degress. The thick arrow shows the direction of the mean wind
vector and the thick circle the 5% level for significance of the mean
vector according to the Rayleigh test. Note that winds are given as vectors,
i.e. a vector pointing southeast corresponds to what would normally be
termed northwesterly winds. On average, birds took off in tail winds but the
mean of winds during take-offs was not different from random in naturally
displaced birds whereas experimentally displaced birds had on average winds
blowing toward East (P<0.01) when migrating.
Orientation of juvenile birds displaced to the Faroe Islands.
(a–c) Orientation on the Faroe Islands: (a) in funnels of birds
displaced from Denmark to the Faroe Islands, (b) vanishing bearings of birds
caught on the Faroe Islands, (c) vanishing bearings of birds translocated
from Denmark to the Faroe Islands. (d) Orientation in funnels of birds
caught and tested in Denmark. (e) Map of Northwest Europe showing the
location of the Faroe Islands (red star) and the main migration through
Northwest Europe (grey arrow). The 1100 km displacement from Denmark (green
star) to The Faroes is shown by the thin arrow. In circular diagrams, the
orientation of individual birds is marked on the periphery of the circle and
the mean sample orientation is shown as a black arrow starting in the circle
centre and with its length relative to the radius corresponding to the
length of the mean vector r. 0 corresponds to orientation
toward North. All sample orientations differ significant from random
according to the Rayleigh test (P<0.05).
Strength (m/s) and direction (°) of the wind vector at each departure
from the Faroe Islands of birds caught on the Faroes (a) and in Denmark
(b).
North is zero degress. The thick arrow shows the direction of the mean wind
vector and the thick circle the 5% level for significance of the mean
vector according to the Rayleigh test. Note that winds are given as vectors,
i.e. a vector pointing southeast corresponds to what would normally be
termed northwesterly winds. On average, birds took off in tail winds but the
mean of winds during take-offs was not different from random in naturally
displaced birds whereas experimentally displaced birds had on average winds
blowing toward East (P<0.01) when migrating.Similarly, birds naturally displaced to the Faroe Islands, presumably by wind drift,
and followed with radio telemetry, apparently compensated for the natural
displacement by departing in directions toward south-southeast
(α = 155°,
r = 0.734,
N = 8,
P = 0.009, Rayleigh test; Figure 1e). The direction differed significantly
from that found in birds caught and tested in cages within the normal migration
route in Denmark (N = 8/29,
F
1,35 = 8.46,
P = 0.006, WW test) and also from the
departure directions of experimentally displaced birds
(N = 8/13,
F
1,19 = 5.75,
P = 0.027, WW test) but not from the
orientation of displaced birds in funnels.In general, no differences among species were apparent. Only if combining naturally
and experimentally displaced birds, the vanishing bearings from the Faroe Islands
differed slightly among species (N = 11/3/7,
F
2,18 = 4.11,
P = 0.034, WW test). Garden warblers
Sylvia borin took off in a more southerly direction
(α = 181°,
r = 0.939,
N = 3,
P = 0.058) than both willow warblers
(α = 93°,
r = 0.797,
N = 7,
P = 0.007) and blackcaps
(α = 124°,
r = 0.663,
N = 11,
P = 0.005). The differences in funnel
orientation and headings among species were smaller and not significant.
Discussion
The compensatory reaction in drifted juvenile birds could be caused by reverse path
integration (dead-reckoning) to register the passive displacement or an even simpler
non-specific reaction to westward displacement by winds during a migratory flight as
in corrective early morning flights [13], [14]. Directional compensation does
not need to be a very precise mechanism but could be a non-specific reaction to any
westward displacement. Despite the expectations from previous releases of displaced
birds, the additional compensation by experimentally displaced birds indicates
surprisingly, that in some circumstances, juveniles may be able to correct for
displacements from the normal route. The juvenile passerines observed here might
well have used a simple form of true navigation.The navigation of birds on the Faroes could have been based on an experience-based
system that was initiated earlier than is generally assumed in these or other
species. The tracks taken by juvenile Eleonora's falcons suggest the
possibility of goal-area navigation toward the winter grounds independent of the
adults [15] and
such restricted migration has also been shown in several other species [16].Previously, only a few studies of bird migrants have hinted at the existence of some
form of navigational responses in juveniles [8], [17], in contrast to a number of
studies showing no compensation [2], [19], [20]. However, in juvenile turtles changes in orientation as a
response to experimental changes of the magnetic field may indicate the use of an
inborn navigational system based on magnetic ‘sign post’ cues [21]–[23] similarly to
the apparently inborn responses to magnetic field changes reported in birds where
fat deposition needed for crossing an ecological barrier is apparently partly
controlled by magnetic cues [24], [25].Our results indicate that there could be minor differences in reactions among
species. The reasons for such differences might relate to different motivational
states and differences in migration routes and distances, but warrant further
in-depth studies. Blackcaps tested on the Faroes by Rabøl [26] were oriented in
the normal migration direction of the Norwegian population in contrast to the
pattern seen here and such a difference could easily be the result of even small
differences in conditions on arrival between years. The expected evolutionary
advantages associated with being able to compensate for displacements are not fully
obvious because juveniles may benefit from dispersing longer than adults as well as
from a bet-hedging strategy with regard to migratory directions [27]. In this study,
the perhaps most pronounced long-distance migrant, the garden warbler, showed the
least reaction to the displacement. Though no firm conclusions can be drawn due to
small sample sizes of this species, this could be because for garden warbler the
direction to a far winter quarter changes less than in the shorter-distance migrants
or be because immediate compensation for displacement is not necessarily optimal
when making optimal use of winds to reach a goal far away [28].Magnetic cues seems to be the most obvious candidates for forming the basis of the
navigational responses to the displacement [29], [30] with relatively large magnetic
field changes for the distances involved in this study (change in declination:
9°; dip: 4°; magnetic intensity: 1500 nT). Inexperienced migrants have been
shown to increase fattening and change their innate directional preference in
response to changes in the magnetic field [25], [31] but the involvement of the
magnetic field in migratory navigation remains unresolved. Experiments with
silvereyes and northern wheatears have shown responses indicating that the magnetic
field can be used for navigation [32], [33]. Other cues such as celestial [18] or olfactory cues [34] may also be
involved.Given the restricted range of the tracking methods used here, the ultimate fate of
the displaced birds is not known. To be able to find out whether birds are able to
find their normal winter grounds would require being able to track the full
migrations of these birds. We believe that the possibility of further
experimentation with free-flying birds will result in much improved possibilities
for investigating the complex relationship with the environment and that such
experimentation is likely to enable us to understand the fascinating navigational
mechanisms in long-distance migrating birds. With the development of smaller
tracking devices this appears possible in a near future.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
This study was carried out in strict accordance with Guidelines to the use of
wild birds in research of the Ornithological Council [35]. Animal work was approved by
the Danish Forest and Nature Agency by permission to the Copenhagen Bird Ringing
Centre (J.nr. SN 302-009) and the Faroese Food and Environmental Agency (J.nr.
2009-00101-43).
Study species
We studied the orientation of juvenile individuals of three small, passerines
– blackcapSylvia atricapilla, garden warbler and willow
warbler Phylloscopus trochilus weighing from around 10 g in the
willow warbler to around 20 g in blackcap and garden warbler. In general, the
birds migrate southwest from northwest Europe with Denmark located in the main
migration corridor and the Faroe Islands far off (Figure 1a). For the three species, the
average direction from ringing to recovery sites is very similar. In blackcaps
it is 198°, in garden warbler 204° and in willow warbler 196°. The
species are nocturnal migrants breeding commonly in northern Europe and
generally spending their non-breeding seasons in sub-Saharan Africa though some
blackcaps winter in the Mediterranean region. Because overall migration route
and wintering grounds are similar, it was considered acceptable to pool the
species for analyses.
Orientation
We investigated birds experimentally displaced 1 100 km from Denmark to the Faroe
Islands as well as birds naturally displaced to the Faroe Islands during autumn
2009.For the experimental displacement, 31 birds were caught 1–10 September
during westerly winds at Blåvand, Denmark (55.33°N; 8.06°E).
Unfortunately, it was not possible to test the birds locally because of hunting.
Instead, the birds were kept in cages with food and water ad libitum before
being transported 140 km to Endelave, Denmark (55.45°N; 10.19°E) where
their orientation was tested under the starry sky on 11 and 13 September. The
birds were then displaced to the Faroe Islands by plane from Copenhagen Airport
on 16 September. Their orientation was tested in funnels on starry nights 22, 23
and 27 September on the southernmost tip of the Faroes (Akraberg). After
orientation tests, the birds were fitted with radio transmitters and released in
Sumba.For the natural experiment, 21 birds were caught in mist nets 11 September to 11
October in Sumba village (61.24°N; 6.42°W) with two additional
individuals caught in Nólsoy (62.00°N; 6.40°W) and transported in
cages to Sumba. After capture (or after transport from Nólsoy), birds
were fitted with radio transmitters and released during daylight.Because the number of orientation tests that could be carried out simultaneously
on the Faroes was limited, only individuals experimentally displaced from
Denmark were tested in Emlen funnels. At the Danish test site, no lights are
visible on the sky from the test cages. Apart from a lighthouse to the
east-southeast which was not in view from the test site due to a lower elevation
(and not lighting in the direction of the test site), there are no visible
artificial light sources at all at the Faroese test site. The orientation was
tested both before and after displacement. Funnel tests were carried out under
clear skies with no moon, approximately two hours after sunset and lasting
approximately 1½ hour. Funnels were painted inside with whitewash and the
orientation was estimated from the scratches left [36]. We only included orientation
if there were at least 30 scratches and the activity pattern was mono-modal or,
in the few cases where a bird showed bimodal orientation, one peak was clearly
larger than the other. Only one test was included for each bird. In general,
birds were tested only once, but five birds were tested on two different days on
the Faroes. If birds were clearly oriented on the first day only this
orientation was included in analyses. In total, 29 birds were well oriented in
funnels in Denmark and 25 birds on the Faroes (see Table S1).
For one bird, no directions were obtained from Denmark or the Faroes.For all birds, both experimentally and naturally displaced, we tested the
migratory orientation when the birds departed from the Faroe Islands 11
September to 14 October. For this purpose, we glued 0.4-g radio transmitters
(LB-2N, Holohil Systems Ltd) to the backs using eyelash adhesive. The signals
from the radio transmitters were recorded manually with a handheld antenna and
automatically tracked by two automatic receiver stations with three antennas
pointing West, South and East, respectively. This arrangement of the automatic
receiver stations allowed us to follow departures in all directions with the
poorest coverage of departures in northerly directions which are expected to be
rare during autumn. One receiver station was placed above the village (Sumba)
overlooking the release area and one located at the highest point to the south
at Akraberg. The orientation of the migrants was estimated from the bearings at
the last point before the radio signal dropped to noise level (vanishing
bearings; [37]). Bearings were obtained manually and crosschecked
with the data from automatic receiver stations. It seems unlikely that the
directions observed for the birds in this study should be the result of
site-specific bias due to the fact that another group of birds followed by radio
telemetry during the study period but consisting of other species with southeast
normal migration directions departed in overall westerly directions very
different from the directions reported here (Thorup et al. in
prep).Migratory flights were recorded for 21 individuals (13 of the 31 birds
experimentally displaced from Denmark and 8 of 23 birds caught on the Faroes).
The migrants departed the village between 01:43 and 05:14 hrs after sunset (mean
= 1:52). On average, birds were tracked for 22 minutes of
which 12 minutes were estimated to be spent on migration after an initial,
height-gaining take-off phase. Wind data from the weather station at Akraberg
(Danish Meteorological Institute) were used to calculate headings following
Åkesson [38]. Some birds took off in quite strong winds up to 17.5
m/s exceeding the birds' airspeed, but 16 birds took off in wind speeds
less than 12 m/s with an overall average of 9.2 m/s. On average, birds took off
in tail winds but the mean of winds during take-offs was not different from
random in naturally displaced birds whereas experimentally displaced birds had
on average south-easterly winds (P<0.01) when migrating
(Figure
S1). The intrinsic flight speed for all birds was set conservatively
to 10 m/s resulting in one case where it was not possible to calculate a
heading. Assuming a flight speed of 10 m/s for the portion of tracking when the
birds appeared to be migrating after initial take off and correcting for winds,
birds could be tracked up to 23 km with an average 7 km, meaning that most birds
flew out over open ocean (Figure
3)
Figure 3
Reconstructed tracks of radio tagged migrants departing from Sumba,
the southernmost point of the Faroe Islands.
Red lines = presumably wind displaced migrants
(N = 12), Blue lines =
translocated migrants (N = 8).
Reconstructed tracks of radio tagged migrants departing from Sumba,
the southernmost point of the Faroe Islands.
Red lines = presumably wind displaced migrants
(N = 12), Blue lines =
translocated migrants (N = 8).Using oriana vers. 3, we tested if the orientation of samples could be considered
random using the Rayleigh test and differences in orientation between and among
samples were tested with Watson-Williams test [39]. Differences between
samples were also tested at the individual level using a confidence interval
test on the individual differences.Differences between orientation in the Faroe Islands and
Denmark. Differences between the Emlen funnel orientation in
Denmark and (a) the Emlen funnel orientation in the Faroes or (b) vanishing
bearing on the Faroe Islands. The circular diagrams show differences at the
individual level marked on the inside of the periphery. Mean differences are
marked with a thick line from center of the circle and the corresponding
95% confidence intervals are also indicated.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.The displacement of juvenile birds to the Faroe Islands. Map of
Europe and West Africa showing the location of the Faroe Islands (red star)
and the main migration through Northwest Europe to West Africa (grey arrow).
The migration route and breeding and wintering grounds are similar for the
three species studied. The 1100 km displacement from Denmark (green star) to
the Faroes is shown by the thin arrow. Possible migration routes from the
Faroes are shown as normal migration direction (1), toward wintering area
(2), and back toward capture site (3).(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Details of the experiments.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Martin Wikelski; Roland W Kays; N Jeremy Kasdin; Kasper Thorup; James A Smith; George W Swenson Journal: J Exp Biol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.312
Authors: Kasper Thorup; Isabelle-A Bisson; Melissa S Bowlin; Richard A Holland; John C Wingfield; Marilyn Ramenofsky; Martin Wikelski Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-11-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marion Gschweng; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Ulrich Querner; Wolfgang Fiedler; Peter Berthold Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Anders P Tøttrup; Raymond H G Klaassen; Roine Strandberg; Kasper Thorup; Mikkel Willemoes Kristensen; Peter Søgaard Jørgensen; James Fox; Vsevolod Afanasyev; Carsten Rahbek; Thomas Alerstam Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Marta Lomas Vega; Mikkel Willemoes; Robert L Thomson; Jere Tolvanen; Jarkko Rutila; Peter Samaš; Roine Strandberg; Tomáš Grim; Frode Fossøy; Bård Gunnar Stokke; Kasper Thorup Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kenneth J Lohmann; Kayla M Goforth; Alayna G Mackiewicz; Dana S Lim; Catherine M F Lohmann Journal: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Date: 2022-01-09 Impact factor: 1.836
Authors: James D McLaren; Judy Shamoun-Baranes; Adriaan M Dokter; Raymond H G Klaassen; Willem Bouten Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2014-10-06 Impact factor: 4.118