Literature DB >> 21464955

Studies on Prn variation in the mouse model and comparison with epidemiological data.

Marjolein van Gent1, Inge H M van Loo, Kees J Heuvelman, Albert J de Neeling, Peter Teunis, Frits R Mooi.   

Abstract

The virulence factor pertactin (Prn) is a component of pertussis vaccines and one of the most polymorphic Bordetella pertussis antigens. After the introduction of vaccination shifts in predominant Prn types were observed and strains with the Prn vaccine type (Prn1) were replaced by strains carrying non-vaccine types (Prn2 and Prn3), suggesting vaccine-driven selection. The aim of this study was to elucidate the shifts observed in Prn variants. We show that, although Prn2 and Prn3 circulated in similar frequencies in the 1970s and 1980s, in the 1990s Prn2 strains expanded and Prn3 strains disappeared, suggesting that in vaccinated populations Prn2 strains are fitter than Prn3 strains. We established a role for Prn in the mouse model by showing that a Prn knock-out (Prn-ko) mutation reduced colonization in trachea and lungs. Restoration of the mutation resulted in a significant increase in colonization compared to the knock-out mutant. The ability of clinical isolates with different Prn variants to colonize the mouse lung was compared. Although these isolates were also polymorphic at other loci, only variation in the promoter for pertussis toxin (ptxP) and Prn were found to contribute significantly to differences in colonization. Analysis of a subset of strains with the same ptxP allele revealed that the ability to colonize mice decreased in the order Prn1>Prn2 and Prn3. Our results are consistent with the predominance of Prn1 strains in unvaccinated populations. Our results show that ability to colonize mice is practically the same for Prn2 and Prn3. Therefore other factors may have contributed to the predominance of Prn2 in vaccinated populations. The mouse model may be useful to assess and predict changes in the B. pertussis population due to vaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21464955      PMCID: PMC3064647          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Bordetella pertussis causes whooping cough or pertussis, a respiratory disease that is most severe in infants. Before childhood vaccination was introduced in the 1950s, pertussis was a major cause of infant mortality worldwide. Whole cell vaccines against pertussis were introduced in the 1940s to 1960s and these were replaced by more defined and less reactogenic acellular vaccines (ACVs) in the 1990s [1], [2]. All ACVs contain pertussis toxin (Ptx). In addition, they may contain filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (Prn) and serotype 2 and 3 fimbriae. Widespread vaccination of children significantly reduced morbidity and mortality. However, in the 1990s a resurgence of pertussis was observed in countries with highly vaccinated populations and pertussis has become the most prevalent vaccine preventable disease in developed countries [2], [3]. Although morbidity is highest in newly born, pertussis is now recognized as a frequent infection of adults [4], [5]. The re-emergence of pertussis has been attributed to waning vaccine-induced immunity and pathogen adaptation [3], [6]. Pathogen adaptation is supported by several observations. Antigenic divergence has occurred between vaccine strains and clinical isolates with respect to several vaccine components; Ptx, Prn, and fimbriae [3], [6], [7], [8]. Further variation in Ptx and Prn has been shown to affect vaccine efficacy in a mouse model [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. In addition to antigenic variation, increased Ptx production has been associated with the resurgence of pertussis [14]. Strains with a novel allele for the Ptx promoter (ptxP3) emerged in the 1990s, replacing the resident ptxP1 strains. A role of vaccination in driving shifts in B. pertussis populations is also supported by recent genomic data [15], [16]. Prn, the focus of this study, is one of the most polymorphic B. pertussis proteins known and 13 prn alleles have been identified so far [3], [6]. Variation in Prn is mainly limited to two regions, designated R1 and R2, which are comprised of Gly-Gly-X-X-Pro and Pro-Gln-Pro repeats, respectively. The R1 region is located proximal to a RGD motif implicated in receptor binding [17] (Fig. 1A). Studies in a number of countries have revealed similar temporal trends in the frequency of Prn variants [8], [10], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. In the last fifty years three Prn variants have been found to predominate: Prn1, Prn2 and to a lesser extent Prn3. In the prevaccination era, essentially all analyzed strains produced Prn1. However in the 1980s, 20 to 30 years after the introduction of whole cell vaccination, Prn strains were replaced by Prn2 and Prn3 strains. As most vaccines contain Prn1 it was suggested that the emergence of Prn2 and Prn3 was vaccine-driven [8]. Consistent with this assumption, it was found that a whole cell vaccine containing Prn1 was less effective against Prn2 strains compared to Prn1 strains in a mouse model [13]. Prn2 strains now predominate in most vaccinated populations. Njamkepo et al. [29] have analyzed strains from a region in Senegal where vaccination was introduced only recently (and where the coverage was still low). They found that, in contrast to strains isolated in the same period in France (where vaccination was introduced in the 1950s and where vaccination coverage is high), all Senegalese strains carried the prn1 allele, characteristic for prevaccination strains. This observation is consistent with the theory of vaccine-driven shifts. Other arguments for the role of vaccination in shifts of Prn variants have recently been reviewed [3]. In the 1990s, whole cell vaccines were replaced by acellular vaccines. Sporadically, in the acellular vaccine period, strains have been isolated which do not produce Prn [30]. However, recently in France a significant percentage (5.6%) of the strains isolated from hospitalized children did not produce pertactin [31]. It was found that the Prn gene was inactivated by deletion or insertion of IS481 [31]. Spread of such Prn-knock out strains may reduce vaccine efficacy, in particular of acellular vaccines which induce a less broad immunity than whole cell vaccines. Evaluation of this threat is hampered by our lack of understanding of the role Prn plays in the ecology of B. pertussis. Here we compare the ability of a Prn-knock out strain with a wild type strain to colonize the mouse lungs and trachea. We also assess the effect of variation in R1 of Prn on colonization in this model.
Figure 1

Variation in pertactin (A) and temporal trends in the frequency of pertactin alleles (B).

The number in the pertactin sequences indicates the amino acid position relative to the N-terminus. The RGD motif implicated in binding to host receptors has been underlined. Repeat motifs are blocked. Dots and dashes indicate sequence identity with Prn1 and gaps, respectively. No strains were available from the period 1960-1964 to determine allele frequencies. Vaccination against pertussis was introduced in 1953.

Variation in pertactin (A) and temporal trends in the frequency of pertactin alleles (B).

The number in the pertactin sequences indicates the amino acid position relative to the N-terminus. The RGD motif implicated in binding to host receptors has been underlined. Repeat motifs are blocked. Dots and dashes indicate sequence identity with Prn1 and gaps, respectively. No strains were available from the period 1960-1964 to determine allele frequencies. Vaccination against pertussis was introduced in 1953.

Methods

Bacterial strains

B. pertussis strains were isolated from Dutch patients in the period 1949 to 1996. Strains were grown on Bordet-Gengou agar (Difco Catalogue no. 0048-17-5) supplemented with 1% (v/v) glycerol and 15% (v/v) sheep blood at 35 °C for 3 days. Strains were made streptomycin resistant to allow recovery on selective plates from mouse lungs and trachea. Characteristics of the strains used are shown in Table S1. Tohama I derivatives were used to construct Prn mutants [32] (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of strains used in this study1.

Tohama I derivatives
Strain designation:Genotype:Remarks:Reference:
B0213 ptxP1, ptxA2, tcfA2, prn1, Fim2Strep resistant Tohama I derivative [48]
B1686 ptxP1, ptxA2, tcfA2, prn::kan, Fim2Prn knock out derived from B0213This work
B2576 ptxP1, ptxA2, tcfA2, prn1, Fim2Back mutant derived from B1686This work

Alleles for ptxP, ptxA, tcfA and prn are shown in addition to the fimbrial (Fim) serotype produced. A table with clinical isolates is provided (Table S1).

Alleles for ptxP, ptxA, tcfA and prn are shown in addition to the fimbrial (Fim) serotype produced. A table with clinical isolates is provided (Table S1).

Construction of Prn knock-out mutants

To construct a Prn knockout mutant (Prn-ko), a fragment of prn (469 bases in size) was amplified using primers PrnXba1F (GCTCTAGAGCCTGGCATCCAATGAACATGT) and PrnEcoR1R (GGAATTCCTGTTCGCCGGCCACATAG), and cloned into pSS1129 [33], resulting in pSR2.1. Subsequently, a kanamycin resistance gene cassette was cloned into the RsrII site located in the 469 base prn fragment of pSR2.1, resulting in pSR2-1.1. The latter plasmid was used to introduce the kan gene into prn1 of the Tohama I derivative B213 by allelic exchange [34]. Correct insertion was checked by sequencing and one strain, B1686, was selected for further studies. Expression of Prn in the knock-out mutant was restored by allelic exchange using pSR2.1. Back mutants were identified by PCR and DNA sequencing. One clone, B2576, was selected for studies in the mouse model. Expression of Prn by B213 and its derivatives was assessed by immunoblotting.

Strain typing

Genotyping was focused on the following genes essentially as described in [35], [36]: prn, ptxP, ptxA and tcfA, coding for, respectively, Prn, the Ptx promoter, the Ptx S1 subunit, and the tracheal colonization factor. Typing of prn alleles is done by sequencing of the repeat regions 1 and 2, and does not distinguish between prn1 and prn7 which are identical in region 1 and 2 but differ in a non-silent SNP outside these regions. Whole genome sequencing has revealed that prn7 is associated with strains which only circulated in the 1950s and 1960s and we assumed here that all strains harbored prn1. Serotyping, which distinguishes between strains producing type 2 or type 3 fimbriae (Fim2 or Fim3) was carried out using the slide agglutination technique [37].

Mouse infection model

All animal was conducted according to relevant national and international guidelines. Strains were grown on Bordet-Gengou plates at 35°C for 24 hrs. After harvesting, the bacterial concentration was adjusted to 5×109 bacteria/ml. The bacterial suspensions were flash-frozen in ethanol/dry ice in small aliquots in Verwey medium [38] with 15% glycerol and stored at –80°C. The viability of the frozen cell suspensions was determined prior to infection. For infection, eight BALB/c mice (Harlan, OlHsd) 4–5 weeks old, were lightly anaesthetised with isoflurane and 40 µl of the inoculum, containing 2*107 CFUs bacteria, was placed on the nostrils and allowed to be inhaled. Three days after infection, mice were sacrificed by intraperitoneal injection of NembutalR (Sanofi/Algrin). To recover B. pertussis, trachea and lungs were removed. The trachea was vortexed in 500 µl Verwey medium with 5 glass pearls for 30 sec at RT. Lungs were homogenised in 900 µl Verwey medium for 10 sec at 20,000 rpm with a homogenizer (Pro Scientific, Pro200) at RT. Appropriate dilutions were plated on Bordet-Gengou plates supplemented with streptomycin, and the number of CFUs was determined. All animal experiments were approved by the Institute's Animal Ethics Committee.

Statistical analysis

CFU counts recovered from mice were log-transformed and zero counts were considered missing values. The data were analysed by Proc GLM in SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The significance among means was tested by the Student-Newman-Keuls test at alpha  = 0.01 or 0.05. Strengths of effects of variation in fimbrial serotype, Prn, the Ptx promoter (ptxP), the Ptx S1 subunit (PtxA) and TcfA on colonization were assessed by ANOVA, followed by a Tukey post-test (Tukey Honest Significant Differences). The ANOVA table can be found in the supporting information section (Table S2). Based on this information, the effect of variation in Prn was assessed in a subset of strains which harbored the same ptxP allele, ptxP1.

Results

Temporal trends in prn alleles in the Netherlands

In a previous work, we analyzed the frequencies of Prn variants in the Netherlands between 1949 and 1996 [8]. Here we extended this analysis to 2009 and included more strains. Pertussis vaccination in the Netherlands was introduced in 1953. The strain composition of the whole cell vaccine was changed a few times, but remained the same from the early 1960s on, when it was comprised of two strains producing Prn1 and Prn7. Prn1 and Prn7 are identical, except for a single amino acid substitution outside the two repeat regions [3]. In the period 1949–1975, Prn1 strains predominated, representing 97% of the isolates (N 64) (Fig. 1B). In this period only two other Prn variants were observed, each in a single strain, Prn2 in 1950 and Prn10 in 1954. In the period 1976–1985, Prn2 and Prn3 strains emerged. Initially, frequencies of both Prn2 and Prn3 strains increased with similar rates. However, in the mid 1990s Prn3 strains decreased in frequency, while Prn2 strains continued to expand. Since 2003, only Prn2 strains have been detected in the Netherlands (N 203). These data suggest that Prn1 strains are more fit in unvaccinated populations, while the non-vaccine types, Prn2 and Prn3, strain are more fit in vaccinated populations. However, of the two non-vaccine types, Prn2 seemed to confer the greatest increase in fitness in vaccinated populations.

The effect of inactivation of the prn gene on colonization of the mouse respiratory tract

In a next step we aimed to determine the effect of variation in Prn on colonization of the mouse respiratory tract. However, it was not clear whether Prn played any role in this animal model. To investigate this, mice were infected with the Tohama I strain or a derivative in which the Prn gene was inactivated by insertion of a kanamycin resistant gene cassette (Prn-ko strain). Subsequently, colonization was assessed three days after infection (Fig. 2). The Prn-ko mutation reduced colonization in trachea and lungs 6- and 4-fold, respectively (P<0.01). When the wild type phenotype was restored by back mutating the knock-out strain, colonization of trachea and lungs was restored (Fig. 2). Although the back mutant showed slightly lower colonization levels compared to the wild type strain in trachea and lungs, the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the back mutation significantly increased colonization compared to the knock-out mutant in trachea and lungs (P<0.01).
Figure 2

Role of Prn in colonization of the mouse respiratory tract.

Mice were infected intranasally with the Tohama I strain (wt), a mutant derivative in which the Prn was inactivated (ko), or a back-mutant in which the Prn gene was restored. Three days post-infection, CFUs were determined in trachea and lungs. The experiment was performed twice, and pooled data from both experiments are shown. Error bars and asterisks indicate 95% confidence intervals and significant differences (P<0.01), respectively.

Role of Prn in colonization of the mouse respiratory tract.

Mice were infected intranasally with the Tohama I strain (wt), a mutant derivative in which the Prn was inactivated (ko), or a back-mutant in which the Prn gene was restored. Three days post-infection, CFUs were determined in trachea and lungs. The experiment was performed twice, and pooled data from both experiments are shown. Error bars and asterisks indicate 95% confidence intervals and significant differences (P<0.01), respectively.

The effect of natural variation in Prn on colonization of the mouse lung

To investigate the effect of natural variation in Prn on colonization, mice were infected with clinical isolates producing one of the three predominant Prn variants, Prn1, Prn2 or Prn3. Colonization of lungs was assessed three days post infection. A comparison of the colonizing ability of Prn variants was complicated by the fact that, in addition to Prn, the strains showed variation in a number of other surface proteins such as PtxA, TcfA and fimbriae (Table S1). Further, strains also differed with respect to the pertussis toxin promoter, ptxP. Three ptxP alleles (ptxP1, ptxP2 and ptxP3) were present in this collection of strains. We have shown that ptxP3 strains produce more Ptx than ptxP1 [14] and Ptx has been shown to affect the colonization of naïve mice [39]. Thus any effect observed in mice could be due to one or more of these polymorphic loci. Multivariate analyses revealed that only variation in Prn and ptxP significantly affected colonization of the mouse (P 0.007 and 0.024, respectively). Based on this information, the effect of variation in Prn was assessed in a subset of strains which harbored the same ptxP allele, ptxP1. Only ptxP1 strains were used in these experiments because the changes observed in Prn types occurred in a period when most strains carried the ptxP1 allele. It was found that the ability of the strains to colonize the mouse lung decreased in the order Prn1>Prn2>Prn3 (Fig. 3). Only the difference between Prn1 and Prn2 was significant, however.
Figure 3

Effect of variation in Prn on colonization of the mouse lung.

Mice were infected with clinical isolates producing Prn1 (N = 15), Prn2 (N = 5) or Prn3 (N = 8). Three days after infection, the number of CFUs in the lung was determined. Error bars and asterisks indicate 95% confidence intervals and significant differences (P<0.05), respectively.

Effect of variation in Prn on colonization of the mouse lung.

Mice were infected with clinical isolates producing Prn1 (N = 15), Prn2 (N = 5) or Prn3 (N = 8). Three days after infection, the number of CFUs in the lung was determined. Error bars and asterisks indicate 95% confidence intervals and significant differences (P<0.05), respectively.

Discussion

The role Prn plays in the ecology of B. pertussis is still under investigation. Prn is non-covalently attached to the outer membrane and may play a role in adherence to monocytes and other host cells [17], . Further, Prn may affect the host immune response as it has been shown that it can augment the suppressive effect of FHA on LPS-induced IL-12 production in vitro [41]. The role of Prn in colonization of the mouse respiratory tract has been studied with B. pertussis and the closely related species Bordetella bronchiseptica. Nicholson and coworkers [42], used a swine isolate of B. bronchiseptica to study the contribution of FHA and Prn to respiratory disease in swine. They found that colonization of the FHA-knock out (FHA-ko) mutant was lower than that of the wild type in the nasal cavity, trachea and lungs. Further, the FHA-ko mutant caused limited to no disease. In contrast, the Prn-ko mutant caused similar disease severity relative to the wild type, however, colonization of the Prn mutant was reduced relative to the wild type during early and late infection. Inatsuka and coworkers, studied the role of Prn in both rats and mice [43]. They observed that, while a Prn-ko B. bronchiseptica strain did not differ from a wild type strain in its ability to establish respiratory infection in rats, it was cleared much faster than wild type bacteria from the mouse lung. These authors went on to show that Prn allows B. bronchiseptica to resist neutrophil-mediated clearance. Studies with B. pertussis gave less clear results with respect to the role of Prn. Roberts and coworkers [44] concluded that a Prn mutant was able to colonize and grow in the lungs and trachea of mice as well as the parent strain, BBC26, although it reached slightly lower levels in both organs. In contrast, in two other studies no effect of a Prn mutation on colonization of the mouse lung was found [45], [46]. Overall, these results suggested that the role of Prn in colonization of the mouse was subtle. In this study, inactivation of the Prn gene significantly reduced colonization of both the trachea and lungs of mice (Fig. 2). Back mutation restored the colonization ability. When clinical isolates were tested for their ability to colonize the mouse lung, significant differences were found. The clinical isolates differ at several other loci making it difficult to assign phenotypes to particular polymorphisms. Multivariate analyses indicated that only variation in ptxP and Prn contributed significantly to the differences in colonization. Ptx enhances colonization of the mouse respiratory tract, presumably by suppressing host innate immunity [39]. Thus the effect of ptxP on colonization is probably due to different levels of Ptx produced in vivo, consistent with in vitro data [14]. When strains were compared which carried an identical ptxP allele (ptxP1), it was observed that the ability to colonize mice decreased in the order Prn1>Prn2 and Prn3 (Fig. 3). This may be due to differential binding of Prn variants to host receptors, as the variable region is located close to the RGD sequence implicated in attachment [17], [47] (Fig. 1A). The effect of variation in Prn on colonization of mice lungs shows interesting parallels with epidemiological data. In the prevaccination era, essentially all strains analyzed produced Prn1. Prn2 and Prn3 emerged in the 1980s, 20 to 30 years after the introduction of vaccination and although the frequency of the two variants was initially similar, Prn2 is now by far the most predominant type. Coexistence of Prn1, Prn2 and Prn3 strains in vaccinated populations has also been observed in Finland, Sweden and the UK [28], [48], [49], [50]. Invariably, Prn2 strains rose to predominance. These data suggest that Prn1 strains are more fit in unvaccinated populations, while the non-vaccine types, Prn2 and Prn3, strain are more fit in vaccinated populations. However, of the two non-vaccine types, Prn2 seemed to confer the greatest increase in fitness in vaccinated populations. Taking together, based on our results and those on vaccinated mice previously published [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] we propose that of the three Prn variants, Prn1 binds most efficiently to the host cells, explaining its predominance in unvaccinated populations. Vaccination with Prn1-containing vaccines may have shifted the competitive balance between Prn variants allowing non-vaccine types Prn2 and Prn3 to emerge. Regarding Prn2 strains, it is not so clear that they colonized more efficiently than Prn3 strains; however, other factors may have contributed to the predominance of Prn2 strains in vaccinated populations. E.g. it is conceivable that antibodies induced by Prn1 bind less well to Prn2 compared to Prn3. Indeed the Dutch WCV was shown to be less efficacious in the mouse model against Prn2 strains compared to Prn3 strains, although the difference was not statistically significant [13]. In addition to Prn1, Prn2 and Prn3, 10 other Prn types have been found in low frequencies in a number of countries [3]. We speculate that the frequency of these variants is the compound effect of receptor fit and cross immunity with vaccine-induced Prn antibodies. The effect of the Prn-KO mutation in the mouse model was relatively small, and one should be careful in extrapolating these results to human populations. Continued strain surveillance in human populations is required to address the question whether Prn-ko mutants which have emerged in France [31] are less fit in human populations and will have a limited ability to spread or cause disease compared to wild type strains. The B. pertussis genome contains many silent genes with unknown function [32] and it is conceivable that compensatory mutations may occur in Prn-ko mutants by gene reactivation or by other mechanisms. In addition to variation in Prn, variation in ptxP was found to significantly affect colonization of the mouse respiratory tract. The long term effect of vaccination on pathogen populations generally cannot be evaluated in the relatively short period in which clinical trials take place. Our results suggest that the mouse model can be used to explain and predict changes in the B. pertussis population due to vaccination. Characteristics of the strains used in this study. (XLS) Click here for additional data file. Analyses of variance of the effect of polymorphisms on colonization of the mouse lung. (XLS) Click here for additional data file.
  49 in total

1.  Antigenic variants in Bordetella pertussis strains isolated from vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

Authors:  Paola Mastrantonio; Patrizia Spigaglia; Hans van Oirschot; Han G J van der Heide; Kees Heuvelman; Paola Stefanelli; Frits R Mooi
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Epidemiological typing of Bordetella pertussis isolates: recommendations for a standard methodology.

Authors:  F R Mooi; H Hallander; C H Wirsing von König; B Hoet; N Guiso
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Direct anti-inflammatory effect of a bacterial virulence factor: IL-10-dependent suppression of IL-12 production by filamentous hemagglutinin from Bordetella pertussis.

Authors:  P McGuirk; K H Mills
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica.

Authors:  Julian Parkhill; Mohammed Sebaihia; Andrew Preston; Lee D Murphy; Nicholas Thomson; David E Harris; Matthew T G Holden; Carol M Churcher; Stephen D Bentley; Karen L Mungall; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Louise Temple; Keith James; Barbara Harris; Michael A Quail; Mark Achtman; Rebecca Atkin; Steven Baker; David Basham; Nathalie Bason; Inna Cherevach; Tracey Chillingworth; Matthew Collins; Anne Cronin; Paul Davis; Jonathan Doggett; Theresa Feltwell; Arlette Goble; Nancy Hamlin; Heidi Hauser; Simon Holroyd; Kay Jagels; Sampsa Leather; Sharon Moule; Halina Norberczak; Susan O'Neil; Doug Ormond; Claire Price; Ester Rabbinowitsch; Simon Rutter; Mandy Sanders; David Saunders; Katherine Seeger; Sarah Sharp; Mark Simmonds; Jason Skelton; Robert Squares; Steven Squares; Kim Stevens; Louise Unwin; Sally Whitehead; Bart G Barrell; Duncan J Maskell
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-10       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  A SIMPLIFIED LIQUID CULTURE MEDIUM FOR THE GROWTH OF HEMOPHILUS PERTUSSIS.

Authors:  W F Verwey; E H Thiele; D N Sage; L F Schuchardt
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1949-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Changes of the Swedish Bordetella pertussis population in incidence peaks during an acellular pertussis vaccine period between 1997 and 2004.

Authors:  Abdolreza Advani; Declan Donnelly; Lennart Gustafsson; Hans O Hallander
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  Synergic effect of genotype changes in pertussis toxin and pertactin on adaptation to an acellular pertussis vaccine in the murine intranasal challenge model.

Authors:  Eiji Komatsu; Fuminori Yamaguchi; Akio Abe; Alison A Weiss; Mineo Watanabe
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-03-31

8.  Characterization of murine lung inflammation after infection with parental Bordetella pertussis and mutants deficient in adhesins or toxins.

Authors:  N Khelef; C M Bachelet; B B Vargaftig; N Guiso
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Polymorphism in the Bordetella pertussis virulence factors P.69/pertactin and pertussis toxin in The Netherlands: temporal trends and evidence for vaccine-driven evolution.

Authors:  F R Mooi; H van Oirschot; K Heuvelman; H G van der Heide; W Gaastra; R J Willems
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Bordetella pertussis strains with increased toxin production associated with pertussis resurgence.

Authors:  Frits R Mooi; Inge H M van Loo; Marjolein van Gent; Qiushui He; Marieke J Bart; Kees J Heuvelman; Sabine C de Greeff; Dimitri Diavatopoulos; Peter Teunis; Nico Nagelkerke; Jussi Mertsola
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Bordetella pertussis evolution in the (functional) genomics era.

Authors:  Thomas Belcher; Andrew Preston
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Strain variation and antigenic divergence among Bordetella pertussis circulating strains isolated from patients in Iran.

Authors:  Fatemah Sadeghpour Heravi; Vajihe Sadat Nikbin; Masomeh Nakhost Lotfi; Pouran Badiri; Nazanin Jannesar Ahmadi; Seyed Mohsen Zahraei; Fereshteh Shahcheraghi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  The route less taken: pulmonary models of enteric Gram-negative infection.

Authors:  Michael L Fisher; Wei Sun; Roy Curtiss
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Small mutations in Bordetella pertussis are associated with selective sweeps.

Authors:  Marjolein van Gent; Marieke J Bart; Han G J van der Heide; Kees J Heuvelman; Frits R Mooi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prevalence and genetic characterization of pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis in Japan.

Authors:  Nao Otsuka; Hyun-Ja Han; Hiromi Toyoizumi-Ajisaka; Yukitsugu Nakamura; Yoshichika Arakawa; Keigo Shibayama; Kazunari Kamachi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Pertussis resurgence: waning immunity and pathogen adaptation - two sides of the same coin.

Authors:  F R Mooi; N A T Van Der Maas; H E De Melker
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.434

7.  Rapid increase in pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis isolates, Australia.

Authors:  Connie Lam; Sophie Octavia; Lawrence Ricafort; Vitali Sintchenko; Gwendolyn L Gilbert; Nicholas Wood; Peter McIntyre; Helen Marshall; Nicole Guiso; Anthony D Keil; Andrew Lawrence; Jenny Robson; Geoff Hogg; Ruiting Lan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Global population structure and evolution of Bordetella pertussis and their relationship with vaccination.

Authors:  Marieke J Bart; Simon R Harris; Abdolreza Advani; Yoshichika Arakawa; Daniela Bottero; Valérie Bouchez; Pamela K Cassiday; Chuen-Sheue Chiang; Tine Dalby; Norman K Fry; María Emilia Gaillard; Marjolein van Gent; Nicole Guiso; Hans O Hallander; Eric T Harvill; Qiushui He; Han G J van der Heide; Kees Heuvelman; Daniela F Hozbor; Kazunari Kamachi; Gennady I Karataev; Ruiting Lan; Anna Lutyńska; Ram P Maharjan; Jussi Mertsola; Tatsuo Miyamura; Sophie Octavia; Andrew Preston; Michael A Quail; Vitali Sintchenko; Paola Stefanelli; M Lucia Tondella; Raymond S W Tsang; Yinghua Xu; Shu-Man Yao; Shumin Zhang; Julian Parkhill; Frits R Mooi
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Acquisition of C1 inhibitor by Bordetella pertussis virulence associated gene 8 results in C2 and C4 consumption away from the bacterial surface.

Authors:  Elise S Hovingh; Bryan van den Broek; Betsy Kuipers; Elena Pinelli; Suzan H M Rooijakkers; Ilse Jongerius
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Genome-wide gene expression analysis of Bordetella pertussis isolates associated with a resurgence in pertussis: elucidation of factors involved in the increased fitness of epidemic strains.

Authors:  Audrey J King; Saskia van der Lee; Archena Mohangoo; Marjolein van Gent; Arno van der Ark; Bas van de Waterbeemd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.