Literature DB >> 21464859

A case study of user assessment of a corrections electronic health record.

L Gates Madison1, W Roeder Phillip.   

Abstract

The federal government, through the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, has moved vigorously to promote widespread and meaningful use of interoperable electronic health records (EHRs) by 2014. The Kentucky Department of Corrections implemented its EHR system in 2006 and in 2010 the department assessed user satisfaction and perception of usability based on criteria that reflect meaningful use. Fifty percent of 345 users responded to an online survey with satisfaction averaging 3.0 out of 4.0 on a 14-item scale and usability averaging 2.8 out of 4.0 for 13 items. The two measures correlated strongly and positively but varied significantly by type of position. This study provides a positive but cautionary case study of how users assess components of an EHR in a relatively stable and controlled organizational setting.

Keywords:  corrections health system; electronic health record; health information technology; meaningful use; user evaluation; user satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21464859      PMCID: PMC3070231     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1559-4122


  14 in total

1.  Nurses resisting information technology.

Authors:  Stephen Timmons
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.393

2.  Instructive resistance.

Authors:  Meg Aranow
Journal:  Health Manag Technol       Date:  2003-01

3.  Barriers to proliferation of electronic medical records.

Authors:  Ignacio Valdes; David C Kibbe; Greg Tolleson; Mark E Kunik; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2004

4.  Getting ready for an EMR. Physician practices should consider several key factors before selecting an electronic medical record system.

Authors:  Charles C Koo
Journal:  Health Manag Technol       Date:  2004-08

5.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions.

Authors:  Robert H Miller; Ida Sim
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 6.  Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Authors:  Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The 2009 EHR user satisfaction survey: responses from 2,012 family physicians.

Authors:  Robert L Edsall; Kenneth G Adler
Journal:  Fam Pract Manag       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

Review 8.  Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries.

Authors:  D A Ludwick; John Doucette
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record.

Authors:  Jason J Saleem; Alissa L Russ; Connie F Justice; Heather Hagg; Patricia R Ebright; Peter A Woodbridge; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report.

Authors:  Hallvard Laerum; Tom H Karlsen; Arild Faxvaag
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.

Authors:  R S Evans
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-05-20

2.  Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world.

Authors:  Heeyoung Han; Lauri Lopp
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2013-02-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.