Literature DB >> 21464758

Incidence of gastroesophageal reflux during transpyloric feeds.

Rachel Rosen1, Kristen Hart, Mary Warlaumont.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Transpyloric feeding has been proposed as an alternative method for controlling gastroesophageal reflux, but there have been no pediatric studies to determine how transpyloric feeding affects reflux burden. The aim of the present study was to determine the reflux burden in patients receiving transpyloric feeds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the multichannel intraluminal impedance tracings of patients who had persistent symptoms and were fed transpylorically during the multichannel intraluminal impedance recording. We compared the reflux profiles during feed and nonfeed periods. We also compared the number of reflux-related hospitalizations at Children's Hospital Boston in the year before and the year after the initiation of transpyloric feeds.
RESULTS: The mean number of reflux events per hour was 1.4 ± 1.3 and 0.8 ± 1.1 during feed and nonfeed periods, respectively (P = 0.06). There was no significant difference in the percentage of time that boluses were present in the esophagus during feed periods (1.0% ± 1.4%) compared with the nonfeed periods (0.6% ± 1.1%, P = 0.5). There was no significant difference in the mean number of reflux-related hospitalizations in the year before (1.2 ± 1.4) or after (1.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.7) the initiation of transpyloric feeds.
CONCLUSIONS: There is more reflux during transpyloric feeding periods than nonfeeding periods, which may explain why some patients continue to have reflux-related hospitalizations even after the initiation of transpyloric feeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21464758     DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31820596f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  6 in total

1.  Individualising care in severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a series of N-of-1 trials comparing transpyloric and gastric feeding.

Authors:  Erik A Jensen; Huayan Zhang; Rui Feng; Kevin Dysart; Kathleen Nilan; David A Munson; Haresh Kirpalani
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Continuous Feedings Are Not Associated With Lower Rates of Gastroesophageal Reflux When Compared With Bolus Feedings.

Authors:  Lisa B Mahoney; Enju Liu; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 3.  Feeding Difficulties in Children with Esophageal Atresia.

Authors:  Lisa Mahoney; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.726

4.  Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen; Yvan Vandenplas; Maartje Singendonk; Michael Cabana; Carlo DiLorenzo; Frederic Gottrand; Sandeep Gupta; Miranda Langendam; Annamaria Staiano; Nikhil Thapar; Neelesh Tipnis; Merit Tabbers
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.839

5.  Gastrointestinal Dysmotility and the Implications for Respiratory Disease.

Authors:  Lusine Ambartsumyan; Samuel Nurko; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-26

Review 6.  Feeding Problems and Their Underlying Mechanisms in the Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula Patient.

Authors:  Lisa Mahoney; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.