Literature DB >> 21464747

Crutch weightbearing on comminuted humeral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of large versus small fragment fixation for humeral shaft fractures.

Ravi Patel1, Corey P Neu, Shane Curtiss, David P Fyhrie, Brad Yoo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the failure properties of length unstable humerii secured with small or large fragment plates.
METHODS: Two nonlocking plate constructs were examined, a nine-hole 4.5-mm limited contact dynamic compression plate (large fragment group) and a 12-hole 3.5-mm limited contact dynamic compression plate (small fragment group), both on composite humerii with a 1-cm defect to simulate comminution (n = 12 for each group). Each plate construct had similar working lengths and number of fixation points. Mechanical testing was first randomized for stiffness measurements in axial and torsional loads. All constructs were then tested in cyclic axial loads to failure.
RESULTS: For axial testing, the large fragment group had a mean stiffness of 1020 ± 195 N/mm compared with 268 ± 67 N/mm in the small fragment group (P < 0.0001). For torsional testing, the large fragment group had a mean stiffness of 1.5 ± 0.05 Nm/degree compared with 0.9 ± 0.04 Nm/degree in the small fragment group (P < 0.0001). Plastic deformation in the large fragment and small fragment groups were 0.09 ± 0.07 mm and 0.20 ± 0.24 mm, respectively (P = 0.1) assessed during cyclic testing up to 300 N. The postcyclic yield force in the large fragment group was 227 ± 30 N and in the small fragment group was 153 ± 5 N (P < 0.0001). The ultimate load in the large fragment and small fragment groups were 800 ± 87 N and 307 ± 15 N, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results corroborate anticipated plate mechanical behavior with plate stiffness increasing as both plate width and thickness increase. The calculated yield force data suggest that both small and large fragment constructs would experience plastic deformation during bilateral crutch ambulation in a patient weighing 50 kg or more. The large fragment construct is not expected to catastrophically fail when subjected to loads in a patient 90 kg or less. The small fragment construct is predicted to catastrophically fail in patients weighing 70 kg or more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21464747     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181df968c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

1.  The treatment of distal third humeral diaphyseal fractures: Is there still a place for the external fixation?

Authors:  N Tartaglia; G Vicenti; M Carrozzo; A Abate; F Rifino; G Picca; G Solarino; B Moretti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-30

2.  Dual plate fixation on distal third diaphyseal fracture of the humerus.

Authors:  Jun-Ku Lee; Yun-Sung Choi; Young-Suk Sim; Dae-Sung Choi; Soo-Hong Han
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Dual plating of humeral shaft fractures: orthogonal plates biomechanically outperform side-by-side plates.

Authors:  Victor Kosmopoulos; Arvind D Nana
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Dynamic Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures Using Active Locking Plates: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Steven M Madey; Stanley Tsai; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Kathleen Earley; Michael Lutsch; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

5.  Humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Andre R Spiguel; Robert J Steffner
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

6.  Dual plating for fixation of humeral shaft fractures: A mechanical comparison of various combinations of plate lengths.

Authors:  Ahmet Karakasli; Onur Basci; Fatih Ertem; Eyad Sekik; Hasan Havitcioglu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 1.511

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.