Literature DB >> 21464531

Automatic breast density segmentation: an integration of different approaches.

Michiel G J Kallenberg1, Mariëtte Lokate, Carla H van Gils, Nico Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

Mammographic breast density has been found to be a strong risk factor for breast cancer. In most studies, it is assessed with a user-assisted threshold method, which is time consuming and subjective. In this study, we develop a breast density segmentation method that is fully automatic. The method is based on pixel classification in which different approaches known in the literature to segment breast density are integrated and extended. In addition, the method incorporates the knowledge of a trained observer, by using segmentations obtained by the user-assisted threshold method as training data. The method is trained and tested using 1300 digitized film mammographic images acquired with a variety of systems. Results show a high correspondence between the automated method and the user-assisted threshold method. Pearson's correlation coefficient between our method and the user-assisted method is R = 0.911 for percent density and R = 0.895 for dense area, which is substantially higher than the best correlation found in the literature (R = 0.70, R = 0.68). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve obtained when discriminating between fatty and dense pixels is 0.987. A combination of segmentation strategies outperforms the application of single segmentation techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21464531     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Prediction of reader estimates of mammographic density using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Georgia V Ionescu; Martin Fergie; Michael Berks; Elaine F Harkness; Johan Hulleman; Adam R Brentnall; Jack Cuzick; D Gareth Evans; Susan M Astley
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-01-31

2.  Breast Density Analysis Using an Automatic Density Segmentation Algorithm.

Authors:  Arnau Oliver; Meritxell Tortajada; Xavier Lladó; Jordi Freixenet; Sergi Ganau; Lidia Tortajada; Mariona Vilagran; Melcior Sentís; Robert Martí
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Automated Volumetric Breast Density derived by Shape and Appearance Modeling.

Authors:  Serghei Malkov; Karla Kerlikowske; John Shepherd
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-22

4.  Automated mammographic density measurement using Quantra™: comparison with the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiology synoptic scale.

Authors:  Inez Yeo; Judith Akwo; Ernest Ekpo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Diane L Nathan; Yan Wang; Yuanjie Zheng; James C Gee; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation.

Authors:  Wenda He; Arne Juette; Erika R E Denton; Arnau Oliver; Robert Martí; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-06-11

7.  Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.

Authors:  Amanda Eng; Zoe Gallant; John Shepherd; Valerie McCormack; Jingmei Li; Mitch Dowsett; Sarah Vinnicombe; Steve Allen; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Laszlo Szekely; Louise Eriksson; Boel Heddson; Ann Sundbom; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Mammographic Breast Density in Chinese Women: Spatial Distribution and Autocorrelation Patterns.

Authors:  Christopher W K Lai; Helen K W Law
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk.

Authors:  U Sovio; J Li; Z Aitken; K Humphreys; K Czene; S Moss; P Hall; V McCormack; I dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.