Literature DB >> 21463416

Vaccines--but not as we know them: an ethical evaluation of HPV vaccination policy in Australia.

Merelyn Rae1, Ian Kerridge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To show how systematic ethical evaluation of public health policy may reveal issues of moral significance for critical examination.
METHOD: Using Australia's human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program as an exemplar and adopting an approach outlined elsewhere, we determine whether conditions of effectiveness, proportionality, necessity and least infringement, and public justification, are met such that any breach of autonomy or justice principles associated with this intervention can be defended.
CONCLUSIONS: While the HPV vaccine itself may be efficacious, some aspects of the program lack sufficient moral justification and raise concerns around procedural and social justice and gender equity. IMPLICATIONS: Public health interventions deploying new technologies against new targets--such as vaccines against cancer and chronic illness--require approaches crafted to their specific risk-benefit profiles that have carefully considered the ethical issues involved. Systematic ethical reflection is a useful tool for this.
© 2011 The Authors. ANZJPH © 2011 Public Health Association of Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21463416     DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00652.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  2 in total

1.  COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and patient self-advocacy: a statistical analysis of those who can and can't get vaccinated.

Authors:  Douglas Ashwell; Joanna Cullinane; Stephen M Croucher
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.135

Review 2.  Framework for Selecting Best Practices in Public Health: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Eileen Ng; Pierpaolo de Colombani
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2015-11-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.