Literature DB >> 21462932

Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis.

Eric K Asare1, Sarita Jaiswal, Jason Maley, Monica Båga, Ramaswami Sammynaiken, Brian G Rossnagel, Ravindra N Chibbar.   

Abstract

The relationship between starch physical properties and enzymatic hydrolysis was determined using ten different hulless barley genotypes with variable carbohydrate composition. The ten barley genotypes included one normal starch (CDC McGwire), three increased amylose starches (SH99250, SH99073, and SB94893), and six waxy starches (CDC Alamo, CDC Fibar, CDC Candle, Waxy Betzes, CDC Rattan, and SB94912). Total starch concentration positively influenced thousand grain weight (TGW) (r(2) = 0.70, p < 0.05). Increase in grain protein concentration was not only related to total starch concentration (r(2) = -0.80, p < 0.01) but also affected enzymatic hydrolysis of pure starch (r(2) = -0.67, p < 0.01). However, an increase in amylopectin unit chain length between DP 12-18 (F-II) was detrimental to starch concentration (r(2) = 0.46, p < 0.01). Amylose concentration influenced granule size distribution with increased amylose genotypes showing highly reduced volume percentage of very small C-granules (<5 μm diameter) and significantly increased (r(2) = 0.83, p < 0.01) medium sized B granules (5-15 μm diameter). Amylose affected smaller (F-I) and larger (F-III) amylopectin chains in opposite ways. Increased amylose concentration positively influenced the F-III (DP 19-36) fraction of longer DP amylopectin chains (DP 19-36) which was associated with resistant starch (RS) in meal and pure starch samples. The rate of starch hydrolysis was high in pure starch samples as compared to meal samples. Enzymatic hydrolysis rate both in meal and pure starch samples followed the order waxy > normal > increased amylose. Rapidly digestible starch (RDS) increased with a decrease in amylose concentration. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis revealed a higher polydispersity index of amylose in CDC McGwire and increased amylose genotypes which could contribute to their reduced enzymatic hydrolysis, compared to waxy starch genotypes. Increased β-glucan and dietary fiber concentration also reduced the enzymatic hydrolysis of meal samples. An average linkage cluster analysis dendrogram revealed that variation in amylose concentration significantly (p < 0.01) influenced resistant starch concentration in meal and pure starch samples. RS is also associated with B-type granules (5-15 μm) and the amylopectin F-III (19-36 DP) fraction. In conclusion, the results suggest that barley genotype SH99250 with less decrease in grain weight in comparison to that of other increased amylose genotypes (SH99073 and SH94893) could be a promising genotype to develop cultivars with increased amylose grain starch without compromising grain weight and yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21462932     DOI: 10.1021/jf200054e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  21 in total

Review 1.  Crop resistant starch and genetic improvement: a review of recent advances.

Authors:  Jian Xia; Dong Zhu; Ruomei Wang; Yue Cui; Yueming Yan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Prowashonupana barley dietary fibre reduces body fat and increases insulin sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans model.

Authors:  Chenfei Gao; Michael L King; Zachary L Fitzpatrick; Wenqian Wei; Jason F King; Mingming Wang; Frank L Greenway; John W Finley; Jeffrey H Burton; William D Johnson; Michael J Keenan; Frederick M Enright; Roy J Martin; Jolene Zheng
Journal:  J Funct Foods       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.451

3.  Starch granule size and amylopectin chain length influence starch in vitro enzymatic digestibility in selected rice mutants with similar amylose concentration.

Authors:  Bharathi Raja Ramadoss; Manu Pratap Gangola; Somanath Agasimani; Sarita Jaiswal; Thiruvengadam Venkatesan; Ganesh Ram Sundaram; Ravindra N Chibbar
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Agro-Morphological Characterization and Nutritional Profiling of Traditional Himalayan Crop Landraces for Their Promotion Toward Mainstream Agriculture.

Authors:  Nikhil Malhotra; Paras Sharma; Hemant Sood; Rahul Chandora; Mamta Arya; Jai Chand Rana; Mohar Singh
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Resistant starch formation in rice: Genetic regulation and beyond.

Authors:  Lisha Shen; Jiayang Li; Yunhai Li
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Rheological behaviors, structural properties and freeze-thaw stability of normal and waxy genotypes of barley starch: a comparative study with mung bean, potato, and corn starches.

Authors:  Shenchi Zhao; Xin Li; Gongshe Hu; Xi Liang; Chengguo Liu; Qian Liu
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Compositional profile of barley landlines grown in different regions of Gilgit-Baltistan.

Authors:  Abid Hussain; Sartaj Ali; Azhar Hussain; Zubair Hussain; Muhammad Faisal Manzoor; Abid Hussain; Amjad Ali; Talat Mahmood; Kashif Sarfraz Abbasi; Emad Karrar; Maqsood Hussain
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.863

8.  Quantification of amylose, amylopectin, and β-glucan in search for genes controlling the three major quality traits in barley by genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Xiaoli Shu; Søren K Rasmussen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Concerted suppression of all starch branching enzyme genes in barley produces amylose-only starch granules.

Authors:  Massimiliano Carciofi; Andreas Blennow; Susanne L Jensen; Shahnoor S Shaik; Anette Henriksen; Alain Buléon; Preben B Holm; Kim H Hebelstrup
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Evaluation of natural materials as exogenous carbon sources for biological treatment of low carbon-to-nitrogen wastewater.

Authors:  Juan Ramírez-Godínez; Icela Beltrán-Hernández; Alejandro Álvarez-Hernández; Claudia Coronel-Olivares; Elizabeth Contreras-López; Maribel Quezada-Cruz; Gabriela Vázquez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.