Literature DB >> 21462750

Volunteering in nature as a way of enabling people to reintegrate into society.

Liz O'Brien1, Ambra Burls, Mardie Townsend, Matthew Ebden.   

Abstract

AIMS: Those who experience emotional and behavioural difficulties or mental health problems, are unemployed or bereaved, or have been in trouble with the law can be socially marginalized and can become isolated from their families, community and wider society. This paper explores the role of active hands-on contact with the environment through a general environmental volunteering programme and through a targeted therapeutic volunteer programme, highlighting how these two approaches can potentially aid some marginalized people to reintegrate into society.
METHODS: This study draws on concepts from the well-being and social capital literatures and refers to two separate pieces of research: Study 1 was based on general environmental volunteering primarily in northern England and southern Scotland; and Study 2 focused on mental health participants at Meanwhile Wildlife Garden in London. Ethnographic and interview data were gathered from participants as a means to understand the benefits they gained from their voluntary involvement. The participants all volunteered to undertake the activities they were involved in and chose outdoor nature activity as opposed to other activities.
RESULTS: There is self-reported and observed evidence from and of participants in these studies that contact with nature can be beneficial to a range of excluded groups; also the studies show that the learning and curative processes that take place in green spaces can provide benefits in terms of social reintegration of vulnerable young people and adults. Three key themes of particular relevance to the marginalized participants were identified as: (1) improving relations with others and nature; (2) working alongside others who are different; and (3) developing social and employable skills. Active hands-on engagement allows people to work at their own pace, since these approaches are not target focused, and skills and social networks can be developed slowly. Practical engagement in environmental conservation work is one approach that may provide people with a new role, identity, skills and social networks. This paper argues that volunteering in nature has the potential to provide a shared purpose for people, independent of gender, age, physical ability, mental functioning, socioeconomic status or knowledge of environmental management. However, it is recognized that particular people may and do experience barriers to engaging with and enjoying the natural environment.
CONCLUSIONS: Volunteering in nature may be particularly effective for those who would like to be outdoors and have more contact with nature yet need specific encouragement and supported/led activities to participate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21462750     DOI: 10.1177/1757913910384048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Public Health        ISSN: 1757-9147


  12 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Volunteer Motivations and Variation in Frequency of Participation in Conservation Activities.

Authors:  Yui Takase; Akhmad Arifin Hadi; Katsunori Furuya
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Promoting Nature-Based Activity for People With Mental Illness Through the US "Exercise Is Medicine" Initiative.

Authors:  Julie Maier; Shannon Jette
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Improving Wellbeing and Environmental Stewardship Through Volunteering in Nature.

Authors:  Robyn Molsher; Mardie Townsend
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 4.  A review of social participation interventions for people with mental health problems.

Authors:  Martin Webber; Meredith Fendt-Newlin
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Environmental volunteer well-being: Managers' perception and actual well-being of volunteers.

Authors:  Gitte Kragh; Rick Stafford; Susanna Curtin; Anita Diaz
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 6.  Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective.

Authors:  Gregory N Bratman; Christopher B Anderson; Marc G Berman; Bobby Cochran; Sjerp de Vries; Jon Flanders; Carl Folke; Howard Frumkin; James J Gross; Terry Hartig; Peter H Kahn; Ming Kuo; Joshua J Lawler; Phillip S Levin; Therese Lindahl; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Richard Mitchell; Zhiyun Ouyang; Jenny Roe; Lynn Scarlett; Jeffrey R Smith; Matilda van den Bosch; Benedict W Wheeler; Mathew P White; Hua Zheng; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Nature-Based Interventions for Improving Health and Wellbeing: The Purpose, the People and the Outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle F Shanahan; Thomas Astell-Burt; Elizabeth A Barber; Eric Brymer; Daniel T C Cox; Julie Dean; Michael Depledge; Richard A Fuller; Terry Hartig; Katherine N Irvine; Andy Jones; Heidy Kikillus; Rebecca Lovell; Richard Mitchell; Jari Niemelä; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Jules Pretty; Mardie Townsend; Yolanda van Heezik; Sara Warber; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-10

8.  Opportunities for cost-sharing in conservation: variation in volunteering effort across protected areas.

Authors:  Paul R Armsworth; Lisette Cantú-Salazar; Mark Parnell; Josephine E Booth; Rob Stoneman; Zoe G Davies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Lovell; Kerryn Husk; Chris Cooper; Will Stahl-Timmins; Ruth Garside
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Mental Health, Greenness, and Nature Related Behaviors in the Adult Population of Stockholm County during COVID-19-Related Restrictions.

Authors:  Mare Lõhmus; Cecilia U D Stenfors; Tomas Lind; André Lauber; Antonios Georgelis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.