OBJECTIVE: Effective behavioral diabetes interventions for Mexican Americans are needed. Our study focused on efforts to recruit Mexican American adults for a trial testing a diabetes community health worker (CHW) self-management intervention. DESIGN: Behavioral randomized controlled trial, community-based participatory research approach. SETTING: Chicago. PARTICIPANTS: Mexican American adults with type 2 diabetes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening and randomization. METHODS:Initial eligibility criteria included Mexican heritage, treatment with oral diabetes medication, residence in designated zip codes, planned residence in the area for two years, and enrollment in a specific insurance plan. RESULTS: Recruitment through the insurer resulted in only one randomized participant. Eligibility criteria were relaxed and subsequent efforts included bilingual advertisements, presentations at churches and community events, postings in clinics, partnerships with community providers, and CHW outreach. Zip codes were expanded multiple times and insurance criteria removed. CHW outreach resulted in 53% of randomized participants. CONCLUSIONS: Despite strong ties with the target community, culturally appropriate recruitment strategies involving community representation, and a large pool of potential participants, significant challenges were encountered in recruitment for this diabetes intervention trial. Researchers identified three key barriers to participation: study intensity and duration, lack of financial incentives, and challenges in establishing trust. For future research to be successful, investigators need to recognize these barriers, offer adequate incentives to compensate for intervention intensity, and establish strong trust through community partnerships and the incorporation of community members in the recruitment process.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Effective behavioral diabetes interventions for Mexican Americans are needed. Our study focused on efforts to recruit Mexican American adults for a trial testing a diabetes community health worker (CHW) self-management intervention. DESIGN: Behavioral randomized controlled trial, community-based participatory research approach. SETTING: Chicago. PARTICIPANTS: Mexican American adults with type 2 diabetes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening and randomization. METHODS: Initial eligibility criteria included Mexican heritage, treatment with oral diabetes medication, residence in designated zip codes, planned residence in the area for two years, and enrollment in a specific insurance plan. RESULTS: Recruitment through the insurer resulted in only one randomized participant. Eligibility criteria were relaxed and subsequent efforts included bilingual advertisements, presentations at churches and community events, postings in clinics, partnerships with community providers, and CHW outreach. Zip codes were expanded multiple times and insurance criteria removed. CHW outreach resulted in 53% of randomized participants. CONCLUSIONS: Despite strong ties with the target community, culturally appropriate recruitment strategies involving community representation, and a large pool of potential participants, significant challenges were encountered in recruitment for this diabetes intervention trial. Researchers identified three key barriers to participation: study intensity and duration, lack of financial incentives, and challenges in establishing trust. For future research to be successful, investigators need to recognize these barriers, offer adequate incentives to compensate for intervention intensity, and establish strong trust through community partnerships and the incorporation of community members in the recruitment process.
Authors: Francisco Ramos-Gomez; Lisa H Chung; Rocio Gonzalez Beristain; William Santo; Bonnie Jue; Jane Weintraub; Stuart Gansky Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Eugene Z Oddone; Maren K Olsen; Jennifer Hoff Lindquist; Melinda Orr; Ronnie Horner; Domenic Reda; Philip Lavori; Gary Johnson; Joseph Collins; John R Feussner Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2004-08
Authors: Richard M Davis; Angela D Hitch; Michele Nichols; Ali Rizvi; Muhammad Salaam; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2008-09-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: David Wendler; Raynard Kington; Jennifer Madans; Gretchen Van Wye; Heidi Christ-Schmidt; Laura A Pratt; Otis W Brawley; Cary P Gross; Ezekiel Emanuel Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2005-12-06 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: M Nabil El-Khorazaty; Allan A Johnson; Michele Kiely; Ayman A E El-Mohandes; Siva Subramanian; Haziel A Laryea; Kennan B Murray; Jutta S Thornberry; Jill G Joseph Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-09-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Steven K Rothschild; Molly A Martin; Susan M Swider; Carmen T Lynas; Elizabeth F Avery; Imke Janssen; Lynda H Powell Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Claudia M Lora; Ana C Ricardo; Carolyn S Brecklin; Michael J Fischer; Robert T Rosman; Eunice Carmona; Amada Lopez; Manjunath Balaram; Lisa Nessel; Kaixiang Kelvin Tao; Dawei Xie; John W Kusek; Alan S Go; James P Lash Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Ana C Talavera; Christina Buelna; Rebeca Espinoza Giacinto; Sheila F Castañeda; Aida Giachello; Madeline Crespo-Figueroa; Johanne B Hernández; Rosalinda Rodriguez; Maria de Los Angeles Abreu; Carlos M Sanchez; Krista Perreira Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Annie L Nguyen; Marco Angulo; Linda L Haghi; Maya Cruz; Nahal Nikroo; Sarah Peraza; Justin Bennink; O Kenrik Duru; Alison A Moore; Laura A Mosqueda Journal: J Health Environ Educ Date: 2016
Authors: Steven K Rothschild; Molly A Martin; Susan M Swider; Carmen M Tumialán Lynas; Imke Janssen; Elizabeth F Avery; Lynda H Powell Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308