Literature DB >> 21462624

Is gingival recession a consequence of an orthodontic tooth size and/or tooth position discrepancy? "A paradigm shift".

Colin Richman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a commonly observed dental lesion. The underlying etiology has not been clearly identified, although several theories have been suggested. Tooth crowding or tooth malalignment is also frequently observed, with both conditions appearing to be more prevalent in developed countries with heterogeneous populations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 consecutively treated patients representing 72 teeth and demonstrating facial clinical GR of > 3 mm were examined clinically, photographically, and with 3-dimensional radiology using conebeam computed tomography. All examined teeth presented with normal interproximal probing depths and attachment levels (< 4 mm). Tooth position or tooth volume plus the associated adjacent alveolar bone volume and GR were analyzed. This group was further evaluated during periodontal surgery for associated alveolar bone fenestrations or dehiscences.
RESULTS: All teeth demonstrating > 3 mm of GR presented with significantly prominent facial tooth contours and associated alveolar bone dehiscences. Most involved teeth presented with their root structures extending beyond the facial alveolar bony housing (fenestrations). This represents a discrepancy between tooth size and alveolar bone dimensions in the buccolingual, axial, and sagittal orientation. Fewer involved teeth were malpositioned toward the buccal aspect. Both conditions were associated with facial alveolar bone dehiscences and associated GR.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests tooth volume and/or tooth position within the alveolar bony housing strongly correlate with GR. All nonperiodontitis-involved teeth with GR were associated with either wider teeth or facially aligned teeth. However, it is emphasized that all facially aligned teeth, or "larger" teeth, do not necessarily present with GR. Based on these findings, the radiographic-supporting bone index is proposed. This index should facilitate appropriate evaluation of the alveolar bone supporting the mucogingival complex, both on the facial and lingual aspect of teeth. Further investigations are needed to support these preliminary data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21462624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent        ISSN: 1548-8578


  6 in total

1.  Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ahmet Yagci; Ilknur Veli; Tancan Uysal; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Törün Ozer; Sukru Enhos
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Gingival recession--can orthodontics be a cure?

Authors:  William M Northway
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of gingival biotype on orthodontic treatment-inducedperiodontal complications: A systematic review.

Authors:  Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Anahita Moscowchi; Shiva Tavakol Davani; Milad Soleimani; Anahita Dehghani Soltani; Muna Al-Shuhayeb
Journal:  J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent       Date:  2020-04-14

4.  Dental cross-bite and gingival marginal recession. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bandar Alyami
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2022-06-21

5.  Can corticotomy (with or without bone grafting) expand the limits of safe orthodontic therapy?

Authors:  Federico Brugnami; Alfonso Caiazzo; Pushkar Mehra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-11-07

6.  From 2D to 3D: Construction of a 3D Parametric Model for Detection of Dental Roots Shape and Position from a Panoramic Radiograph-A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Laura Mazzotta; Mauro Cozzani; Armando Razionale; Sabrina Mutinelli; Attilio Castaldo; Armando Silvestrini-Biavati
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-03-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.