Literature DB >> 21462402

What factors shape rates of phenotypic evolution? A comparative study of cranial morphology of four mammalian clades.

N Cooper1, A Purvis.   

Abstract

Understanding why rates of morphological evolution vary is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Classical work suggests that body size, interspecific competition, geographic range size and specialization may all be important, and each may increase or decrease rates of evolution. Here, we investigate correlates of proportional evolutionary rates in phalangeriform possums, phyllostomid bats, platyrrhine monkeys and marmotine squirrels, using phylogenetic comparative methods. We find that the most important correlate is body size. Large species evolve the fastest in all four clades, and there is a nonlinear relationship in platyrrhines and phalangeriformes, with the slowest evolution in species of intermediate size. We also find significant increases in rate with high environmental temperature in phyllostomids, and low mass-specific metabolic rate in marmotine squirrels. The mechanisms underlying these correlations are uncertain and appear to be size specific. We conclude that there is significant variation in rates of evolution, but that its meaning is not yet clear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 21462402     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01714.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  13 in total

1.  Adaptive evolution toward larger size in mammals.

Authors:  Joanna Baker; Andrew Meade; Mark Pagel; Chris Venditti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Metabolic physiology explains macroevolutionary trends in the melanic colour system across amniotes.

Authors:  Chad M Eliason; Julia A Clarke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  First comparative study of primate morphological and molecular evolutionary rates including muscle data: implications for the tempo and mode of primate and human evolution.

Authors:  Rui Diogo; Zuogang Peng; Bernard Wood
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Sex biases in bird and mammal natural history collections.

Authors:  Natalie Cooper; Alexander L Bond; Joshua L Davis; Roberto Portela Miguez; Louise Tomsett; Kristofer M Helgen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Morphometric relationship, phylogenetic correlation, and character evolution in the species-rich genus Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae).

Authors:  Hyojoong Kim; Wonhoon Lee; Seunghwan Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Exploring the correlations between sequence evolution rate and phenotypic divergence across the Mammalian tree provides insights into adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Jan Janecka; Bhanu Chowdhary; William Murphy
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Are species' responses to global change predicted by past niche evolution?

Authors:  Sébastien Lavergne; Margaret E K Evans; Ian J Burfield; Frederic Jiguet; Wilfried Thuiller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Inferring speciation modes in a clade of Iberian chafers from rates of morphological evolution in different character systems.

Authors:  Dirk Ahrens; Ignacio Ribera
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Evidence for an intrinsic factor promoting landscape genetic divergence in Madagascan leaf-litter frogs.

Authors:  Katharina C Wollenberg Valero
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  The evolution of morphospace in phytophagous scarab chafers: no competition--no divergence?

Authors:  Jonas Eberle; Renier Myburgh; Dirk Ahrens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.