Literature DB >> 21462385

Minimally-invasive treatment of communicating hydrocephalus using a percutaneous lumboperitoneal shunt.

Lu Jia1, Zhong-Xin Zhao, Chao You, Jia-gang Liu, Si-qing Huang, Min He, Pei-gang Ji, Jie Duan, Yi-jun Zeng, Guo-ping Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical value of a minimally-invasive treatment of communicating hydrocephalus using a percutaneous lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt.
METHOD: The clinical and long-term follow-up data of 256 patients suffering from communicating hydrocephalus and undergoing percutaneous LP shunt during 1998 to 2008 were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: After the follow-up, which lasted 6 months to 10 years, 219 cases of communicating hydrocephalus recovered well (ventricular size returned to normal and symptoms completely disappeared), 25 cases were brought under control (ventricle size reduced by 50% and symptoms partially abated), and 12 cases showed no obvious changes. Fifteen obese subjects needed modifications of the shunt due to the obstruction of the abdominal end following wrapping, and one subject underwent extubation as the subject was unable to tolerate stimulation of the cauda equina. The effectiveness of shunting was 91.40% and the probability of shunt-tube obstruction, which occurs predominantly in the abdominal end, was only 5.85%, far lower than that of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Three subjects had a history of infection following VP shunting.
CONCLUSION: LP shunting is minimally invasive and effective in treating communicating hydrocephalus, with fewer complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21462385      PMCID: PMC3072593          DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1000248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B        ISSN: 1673-1581            Impact factor:   3.066


  14 in total

1.  Lumboperitoneal shunts: review of 409 cases.

Authors:  Y R Yadav; Sanjay Pande; Vijay K Raina; Manish Singh
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Percutaneous lumboperitoneal shunt. Technical note.

Authors:  R F Spetzler; C B Wilson; J M Grollmus
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Long-term results in various treatments of hydrocephalus.

Authors:  R F Jones
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Lumboperitoneal shunting: a retrospective study in the pediatric population.

Authors:  P D Chumas; A V Kulkarni; J M Drake; H J Hoffman; R P Humphreys; J T Rutka
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Simplified percutaneous lumboperitoneal shunting.

Authors:  R Spetzler; C B Wilson; R Schulte
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1977-01

6.  Peritoneal shunts in the management of hydrocephalus.

Authors:  F Murtagh; R Lehman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1967-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Ventriculoperitoneal shunting in childhood tuberculous meningitis.

Authors:  D Lamprecht; J Schoeman; P Donald; H Hartzenberg
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  Lumboperitoneal shunt: clinical applications, complications, and comparison with ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

Authors:  N Aoki
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Complications of lumboperitoneal shunts.

Authors:  Vincent Y Wang; Nicholas M Barbaro; Michael T Lawton; Lawrence Pitts; Sandeep Kunwar; Andrew T Parsa; Nalin Gupta; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  The incidence of epilepsy after ventricular shunting procedures.

Authors:  N G Dan; M J Wade
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  1 in total

1.  Delayed intracerebellar hemorrhage secondary to lumboperitoneal shunt insertion.

Authors:  Uygur Er; Çetin Akyol; Murad Bavbek
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.