Literature DB >> 21462364

Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant treatment modalities and definitive non-surgical therapy for oesophageal squamous cell cancer.

M Kranzfelder1, T Schuster, H Geinitz, H Friess, P Büchler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is surgical resection with adequate lymphadenectomy. Most Western patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In recent years some patients have received CRT alone (definitive CRT, dCRT). This meta-analysis sought to clarify the benefits of neoadjuvant and definitive treatment for OSCC.
METHODS: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified using the Cochrane database, MEDLINE and Embase. Only RCTs with intention-to-treat analysis, and published hazard ratios (HRs) or estimates from survival data, were included.
RESULTS: Nine RCTs involving neoadjuvant CRT versus surgery, eight involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery, and three involving neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery or surgery alone versus dCRT were identified. The HR for overall survival was 0·81 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·70 to 0·95; P = 0·008) after neoadjuvant CRT and 0·93 (0·81 to 1·08; P = 0·368) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The likelihood of R0 resection was significantly higher after neoadjuvant treatment (CRT: HR 1·15, P = 0·043; chemotherapy: HR 1·16, P = 0·006). Morbidity rates were not increased after neoadjuvant CRT (HR 0·94, P = 0·363) but 30-day mortality was non-significantly higher with combined treatment. Morbidity (HR 1·03, P = 0·638) and mortality (HR 1·04, P = 0·810) rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery did not differ from those after surgery alone. None of the RCTs reporting outcome after dCRT demonstrated a significant survival benefit, but treatment-related mortality rates were lower (HR 7·60, P = 0·007) than with neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery or surgery alone.
CONCLUSION: For patients with resectable OSCC, a significant survival benefit for neoadjuvant CRT was evident, with no increase in morbidity rate. dCRT did not demonstrate any survival benefit over other curative strategies.
Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21462364     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  52 in total

1.  Epigenetic regulation of the novel tumor suppressor cysteine dioxygenase 1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Junhye Kwon; Misun Park; Ji-Hee Kim; Hae Won Lee; Moon Chul Kang; Jong Ho Park
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-04-24

Review 2.  Current status of and perspectives regarding neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroshi Saeki; Yuichiro Nakashima; Yoko Zaitsu; Yasuo Tsuda; Yuta Kasagi; Koji Ando; Yu Imamura; Kippei Ohgaki; Shuhei Ito; Yasue Kimura; Akinori Egashira; Eiji Oki; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Localization of thoracic duct using heavily T2W MRI for intractable post-esophagectomy chylothorax-a case report.

Authors:  Yi-Chien Chang; Yi-Ting Yen; Ming-Chung Chang; Yau-Lin Tseng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Frank Hofheinz; Yimin Li; Ingo G Steffen; Qin Lin; Chen Lili; Wu Hua; Jörg van den Hoff; Sebastian Zschaeck
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Comparison of dosimetric parameters and toxicity in esophageal cancer patients undergoing 3D conformal radiotherapy or VMAT.

Authors:  Stefan Münch; Sylvia Aichmeier; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Marciana-Nona Duma; Markus Oechsner; Marcus Feith; Stephanie E Combs; Daniel Habermehl
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer : Outcomes and patterns of failure.

Authors:  Matthias Felix Haefner; Kristin Lang; Vivek Verma; Stefan Alexander Koerber; Lorenz Uhlmann; Juergen Debus; Florian Sterzing
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: long-term outcome.

Authors:  Arif Deniz Ordu; Carsten Nieder; Hans Geinitz; Philipp Günther Kup; Lisa Felicia Deymann; Vera Scherer; Stephanie E Combs; Khashayar Fakhrian
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Should cT2 esophageal cancer get neoadjuvant treatment before surgery?

Authors:  Peter Thuss-Patience; Loredana Vecchione; Ulrich Keilholz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Surveillance or resection after chemoradiation in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Il-Hwan Park; Jae Y Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

Review 10.  Chylothorax after esophagectomy for cancer: impact of the surgical approach and neoadjuvant treatment: systematic review and institutional analysis.

Authors:  Michael Kranzfelder; Ralf Gertler; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Helmut Friess; Marcus Feith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.