Literature DB >> 21461893

Usability of Fag e 2 ImmunoCAP in the diagnosis of buckwheat allergy.

Kimiko Tohgi1, Kunie Kohno, Hitoshi Takahashi, Hiroaki Matsuo, Satoshi Nakayama, Eishin Morita.   

Abstract

Currently, the detection of crude buckwheat extract-specific IgE by ImmunoCAP (f11) (Phadia AB, Uppsala, Sweden) is widely used to diagnose buckwheat allergy. However, the results of this test do not always correlate with the development of allergic symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of specific IgE antibody titers for the major buckwheat allergens Fag e 1 and Fag e 2. Specific IgE antibodies were determined using the ImmunoCAP method for native Fag e 1 and Fag e 2, recombinant Fag e 1 and Fag e 2, and crude buckwheat extract (f11) in 10 buckwheat allergy patients, 14 atopic dermatitis patients, and 15 healthy subjects. All buckwheat allergy patients showed positive results for native Fag e 1- and Fag e 2-specific IgE tests and for ImmunoCAP (f11). In contrast, the rates of atopic dermatitis patients with positive results for native Fag e 1- and Fag e 2-specific IgE tests were 64.2% (9/14) and 57.1% (8/14), respectively. The sensitivities of the test using recombinant proteins were lower than those of the test using native proteins. The area under the curve (AUC) as determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was the largest for the native Fag e 2-specific IgE test (0.967), with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 89.6% (cut-off: 2.74 kUa/L). Thus, the native Fag e 2-specific IgE antibody titer obtained using the ImmunoCAP method is more reliable than the buckwheat ImmunoCAP (f11) value for predicting buckwheat allergy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21461893     DOI: 10.1007/s00403-011-1142-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res        ISSN: 0340-3696            Impact factor:   3.017


  5 in total

1.  Reactions of Buckwheat-Hypersensitive Patients during Oral Food Challenge Are Rare, but Often Anaphylactic.

Authors:  Noriyuki Yanagida; Sakura Sato; Kyohei Takahashi; Ken-Ichi Nagakura; Kiyotake Ogura; Tomoyuki Asaumi; Motohiro Ebisawa
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.749

2.  Significance of 40-, 45-, and 48-kDa Proteins in the Moderate-to-Severe Clinical Symptoms of Buckwheat Allergy.

Authors:  Joongbum Cho; Jeong-Ok Lee; Jaehee Choi; Mi-Ran Park; Dong-Hwa Shon; Jihyun Kim; Kangmo Ahn; Youngshin Han
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.764

3.  Concomitant sensitization to legumin, Fag e 2 and Fag e 5 predicts buckwheat allergy.

Authors:  S Geiselhart; C Nagl; P Dubiela; A C Pedersen; M Bublin; C Radauer; C Bindslev-Jensen; K Hoffmann-Sommergruber; C G Mortz
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.018

4.  Understanding buckwheat allergies for the management of allergic reactions in humans and animals.

Authors:  Rie Satoh; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Reiko Teshima
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Allergen Microarrays for In Vitro Diagnostics of Allergies: Comparison with ImmunoCAP and AdvanSure.

Authors:  Hyunjin Jeon; Joo Hyun Jung; Yoonji Kim; Youngeun Kwon; Seon Tae Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.464

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.