AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In humans, the intranasal route allows insulin to reach the brain while maintaining peripheral euglycaemia. Our aims were to examine acute (unconditioned) effects of central insulin on normal-range blood glucose and hormones in men, and to find out whether the effects of intranasal insulin can be learnt via classical conditioning. METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial, 32 healthy normal-weight men (mean age 24.2 [SEM 0.5], mean BMI 22.4 [0.3]) received a conditioned stimulus (CS) and six administrations of either soluble H-insulin 100 (20 U [0.2 ml]; group 1; n = 16) or vehicle (0.2 ml; group 2; n = 16) on day 1. The CS was the tarry smell of meta-cresol (used as a stabilising vehicle in many insulin preparations and placebos). On day 2, all participants received the CS and six administrations of placebo. Participants and experimenters were blinded to group assignment. Sixteen individuals were randomised to and analysed in each group. Participants were sequentially numbered for group allocation. The main outcome measures were blood glucose and insulin, expressed as cumulative difference-from-baseline changes. RESULTS: While maintaining euglycaemia, intranasal insulin induced an increase of peripheral insulin on day 1 (group 1, 17.78 [21.88] pmol/l vs group 2, -10.24 [9.42] pmol/l), and also on day 2 when the CS was given with placebo (group 1, 12.53 [5.57] pmol/l vs group 2, -5.51 [6.16] pmol/l). Moreover, a moderate reduction of blood glucose on day 1 (group 1, -0.54 [0.36] mmol/l vs group 2, 0.58 [0.48] mmol/l) was obtained (all p values <0.05). There were no adverse side effects. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The unconditioned blood glucose decrease on day 1 and the unconditioned and conditioned increases of peripheral insulin are indicative of brain-pancreas cross-talk. The conditionability of the hormonal responses reveals new applications for intranasal insulin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00000537 http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/ FUNDING: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG STO 323/1-1 and 1-2.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In humans, the intranasal route allows insulin to reach the brain while maintaining peripheral euglycaemia. Our aims were to examine acute (unconditioned) effects of central insulin on normal-range blood glucose and hormones in men, and to find out whether the effects of intranasal insulin can be learnt via classical conditioning. METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial, 32 healthy normal-weight men (mean age 24.2 [SEM 0.5], mean BMI 22.4 [0.3]) received a conditioned stimulus (CS) and six administrations of either soluble H-insulin 100 (20 U [0.2 ml]; group 1; n = 16) or vehicle (0.2 ml; group 2; n = 16) on day 1. The CS was the tarry smell of meta-cresol (used as a stabilising vehicle in many insulin preparations and placebos). On day 2, all participants received the CS and six administrations of placebo. Participants and experimenters were blinded to group assignment. Sixteen individuals were randomised to and analysed in each group. Participants were sequentially numbered for group allocation. The main outcome measures were blood glucose and insulin, expressed as cumulative difference-from-baseline changes. RESULTS: While maintaining euglycaemia, intranasal insulin induced an increase of peripheral insulin on day 1 (group 1, 17.78 [21.88] pmol/l vs group 2, -10.24 [9.42] pmol/l), and also on day 2 when the CS was given with placebo (group 1, 12.53 [5.57] pmol/l vs group 2, -5.51 [6.16] pmol/l). Moreover, a moderate reduction of blood glucose on day 1 (group 1, -0.54 [0.36] mmol/l vs group 2, 0.58 [0.48] mmol/l) was obtained (all p values <0.05). There were no adverse side effects. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The unconditioned blood glucose decrease on day 1 and the unconditioned and conditioned increases of peripheral insulin are indicative of brain-pancreas cross-talk. The conditionability of the hormonal responses reveals new applications for intranasal insulin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00000537 http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/ FUNDING: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG STO 323/1-1 and 1-2.
Authors: U Stockhorst; E Gritzmann; K Klopp; Y Schottenfeld-Naor; A Hübinger; H W Berresheim; H J Steingrüber; F A Gries Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1999 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Mark A Reger; G Stennis Watson; Pattie S Green; Laura D Baker; Brenna Cholerton; Mark A Fishel; Stephen R Plymate; Monique M Cherrier; Gerard D Schellenberg; William H Frey; Suzanne Craft Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: M Heni; S Kullmann; C Ketterer; M Guthoff; K Linder; R Wagner; K T Stingl; R Veit; H Staiger; H-U Häring; H Preissl; A Fritsche Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Ángel Ortega; Juan Salazar; Néstor Galban; Milagros Rojas; Daniela Ariza; Mervin Chávez-Castillo; Manuel Nava; Manuel E Riaño-Garzón; Edgar Alexis Díaz-Camargo; Oscar Medina-Ortiz; Valmore Bermúdez Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Diana S Ferreira de Sá; Sonja Römer; Alexandra H Brückner; Tobias Issler; Alexander Hauck; Tanja Michael Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 7.853