| Literature DB >> 21461160 |
Rajnarayan R Tiwari1, Raj Narain, Y K Sharma, Sunil Kumar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quartz stone grinders are one such group of workers who are exposed to silica and thereby at risk of developing silicosis. However due to increased campaigning against silicosis the scenario has changed.Entities:
Keywords: Silicosis; quartz stone workers
Year: 2010 PMID: 21461160 PMCID: PMC3062020 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5278.75695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Occup Environ Med ISSN: 0973-2284
Distribution of study subjects according to demographic characteristics
| Characteristics | Present workers | Ex-workers |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| <20 | 12 (6.6) | 14 (10.4) |
| 20–29 | 109 (59.9) | 40 (29.8) |
| 30–39 | 47 (25.8) | 49 (36.6) |
| ≥40 | 14 (7.7) | 31 (23.2) |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 157 (86.3) | 74 (55.2) |
| Female | 25 (13.7) | 60 (44.8) |
| Educational status | ||
| Illiterate | 97 (53.4) | 114 (85.1) |
| Primary | 15 (8.2) | 9 (6.7) |
| Middle school | 43 (23.6) | 10 (7.3) |
| Secondary and higher secondary | 13 (7.1) | 1 (0.7) |
| Graduate and above | 14 (7.7) | – |
Distribution of study subjects according to occupational characteristics
| Characteristics | Present workers | Ex-workers |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of exposure (years) | ||
| <1 | 127 (69.8) | 1 (0.7) |
| 1–5 | 34 (18.6) | 126 (94.0) |
| ≥5 | 21 (11.6) | 7 (5.3) |
| Process | ||
| Crushing | 93 (51.1) | 92 (68.6) |
| Screening | 15 (8.2) | 7 (5.3) |
| Loading/unloading | 24 (13.2) | 30 (22.4) |
| Maintenance | 20 (10.9) | 3 (2.2) |
| Others | 30 (16.5) | 2 (1.5) |
Distribution of study subjects according to respiratory symptoms
| Respiratory symptoms | Present workers | Ex-workers |
|---|---|---|
| Cough | 46 (25.0) | 38 (20.8) |
| Phlegm production | 24 (13.0) | 31 (17.0) |
| Hemoptysis | 3 (1.6) | 32 (26.0) |
| Dyspnea | 45 (24.5) | 128 (93.4) |
| Chest pain | 36 (19.6) | 127 (92.7) |
| Loss of weight | 7 (3.8) | 69 (50.4) |
| Evening rise of temperature | 2 (1.1) | 48 (35.3) |
| Loss of appetite | 5 (2.7) | 52 (38.0) |
Distribution of study subjects according to respiratory morbid conditions
| Respiratory morbid condition | Present workers | Ex-workers |
|---|---|---|
| Silicosis | 1 (0.5) | 24 (17.9) |
| Silicotuberculosis | – | 33 (24.6) |
| Tuberculosis | 10 (5.5) | 17 (12.7) |
| Normal | 171 (94.0) | 60 (44.8) |
Distribution of study subjects according to the respiratory function after adjusting for respiratory morbidities
| Respiratory function | Present workers | Ex-workers | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean spirometric values | |||
| FEV1 | 2.95 ± 0.72 | 2.79 ± 0.69 | >0.05 |
| FVC1 | 3.49 ± 0.76 | 3.32 ± 0.82 | >0.05 |
| PEFR | 6.25 ± 1.88 | 5.74 ± 1.72 | >0.05 |
| MMEFR25-75 | 2.89 ± 1.25 | 3.23 ± 1.18 | >0.05 |
| Pulmonary function status | |||
| Normal | 142 (82.5) | 47 (78.3) | >0.05 |
| Combined | 4 (2.3) | 2 (3.3) | |
| Restrictive | 12 (16.7) | 3 (5.0) | |
| Obstructive | 14 (8.1) | 8 (13.3) |
Normal PFT status vs. abnormal PFT status; χ2 = 0.46, df = 1, nonsignificant.