OBJECTIVE: Endothelial progenitor cells play an active role in vascular repair and revascularization of tissue damaged by traumatic, inflammatory, and ischemic injures. We correlate the changes in circulating endothelial progenitor cells with the severity of traumatic brain injury. The study is designed to investigate the endothelial progenitor cell mobilization after injury and a potential use of circulating endothelial progenitor cells as a prognostic marker for evaluating trauma severity and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study conducted in two neurosurgical intensive care units of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and Tianjin Huanhu Hospital (Tianjin, China). PATIENTS: Patients with traumatic brain injury and age- and gender-matched healthy controls. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Changes in the levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells were monitored for up to 21 days in 84 patients with traumatic brain injury. Results were correlated with the clinical assessment of injury severity as determined by the Glasgow Coma Scale. The level of circulating endothelial progenitor cells was found to be suppressed 24-48 hrs after injury but rapidly increased, reaching the highest at days 5-7 post-trauma. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with improved Glasgow Coma Scale scores were significantly higher than those with deteriorated conditions and remained persistently low in patients who died of trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the level of circulating endothelial progenitor cells correlates with the clinical severity and outcome of traumatic brain injury and may offer potential as a prognostic marker for traumatic brain injury. A long-term follow-up of these patients is ongoing.
OBJECTIVE: Endothelial progenitor cells play an active role in vascular repair and revascularization of tissue damaged by traumatic, inflammatory, and ischemic injures. We correlate the changes in circulating endothelial progenitor cells with the severity of traumatic brain injury. The study is designed to investigate the endothelial progenitor cell mobilization after injury and a potential use of circulating endothelial progenitor cells as a prognostic marker for evaluating trauma severity and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study conducted in two neurosurgical intensive care units of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and Tianjin Huanhu Hospital (Tianjin, China). PATIENTS: Patients with traumatic brain injury and age- and gender-matched healthy controls. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Changes in the levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells were monitored for up to 21 days in 84 patients with traumatic brain injury. Results were correlated with the clinical assessment of injury severity as determined by the Glasgow Coma Scale. The level of circulating endothelial progenitor cells was found to be suppressed 24-48 hrs after injury but rapidly increased, reaching the highest at days 5-7 post-trauma. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with improved Glasgow Coma Scale scores were significantly higher than those with deteriorated conditions and remained persistently low in patients who died of trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the level of circulating endothelial progenitor cells correlates with the clinical severity and outcome of traumatic brain injury and may offer potential as a prognostic marker for traumatic brain injury. A long-term follow-up of these patients is ongoing.
Authors: H C de Boer; C Verseyden; L H Ulfman; J J Zwaginga; I Bot; E A Biessen; T J Rabelink; A J van Zonneveld Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2006-04-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: M Peichev; A J Naiyer; D Pereira; Z Zhu; W J Lane; M Williams; M C Oz; D J Hicklin; L Witte; M A Moore; S Rafii Journal: Blood Date: 2000-02-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Eli I Lev; Neal S Kleiman; Yochai Birnbaum; David Harris; Martin Korbling; Zeev Estrov Journal: J Vasc Res Date: 2005-08-08 Impact factor: 1.934
Authors: U M Gehling; S Ergün; U Schumacher; C Wagener; K Pantel; M Otte; G Schuch; P Schafhausen; T Mende; N Kilic; K Kluge; B Schäfer; D K Hossfeld; W Fiedler Journal: Blood Date: 2000-05-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Giuseppe Pintucci; Scott Froum; Jared Pinnell; Paolo Mignatti; Shahin Rafii; David Green Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Eli I Lev; Zeev Estrov; Khatira Aboulfatova; David Harris; Juan F Granada; Carlos Alviar; Neal S Kleiman; Jing-fei Dong Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: T Asahara; T Murohara; A Sullivan; M Silver; R van der Zee; T Li; B Witzenbichler; G Schatteman; J M Isner Journal: Science Date: 1997-02-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Rob P W Rouhl; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Jan Damoiseaux; Jan-Willem Cohen Tervaert; Jan Lodder Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sushma K Cribbs; Diane J Sutcliffe; William R Taylor; Mauricio Rojas; Kirk A Easley; Li Tang; Kenneth L Brigham; Greg S Martin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sabrina H van Ierssel; Philippe G Jorens; Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck; Viviane M Conraads Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 3.411