Literature DB >> 21460652

Donor-site morbidity and patient satisfaction using a composite nipple graft for unilateral nipple reconstruction in the radiated and nonradiated breast.

Scott L Spear1, Adam D Schaffner, M Renée Jespersen, Jesse A Goldstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of techniques available for nipple reconstruction underscores the notion that achieving an acceptable result remains a challenge. To better assess the value of a composite nipple graft in unilateral breast reconstruction, a study was performed to evaluate donor-site morbidity and patient satisfaction using a composite nipple graft for unilateral nipple reconstruction following mastectomy and reconstruction in radiated and nonradiated patients.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent composite nipple reconstruction between October of 1993 and February of 2010 was performed. Medical records were reviewed for outcomes and complications. Each patient was asked to complete a previously validated survey to rate color and projection of both nipples, sensation, and contractility of the donor nipple, and whether she would, in retrospect, have the procedure again.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were identified who underwent nipple reconstruction using a composite nipple graft. Thirty-four patients (57.6 percent) responded to the survey. Four surveys were returned due to an invalid address. Average time to breast mound completion was 6 months. Average time to complete nipple reconstruction was 3.6 months after breast mound completion. Ninety-seven percent of the reconstructions were successful.
CONCLUSIONS: Composite nipple reconstruction is a useful technique that should be considered in unilateral nipple reconstruction and should be especially considered in patients whose breast has been irradiated, for which flap reconstruction for the nipple can be riskier. Although it is not possible to use in all patients, no other technique provides a nipple reconstruction that can so closely match the contralateral side in color, texture, and overall appearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21460652     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Reducing donor site morbidity when reconstructing the nipple using a composite nipple graft.

Authors:  Taik Jong Lee; Hyung Joo Noh; Eun Key Kim; Jin Sup Eom
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

2.  Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ellen S Satteson; Benjamin J Brown; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

3.  Biologic collagen cylinder with skate flap technique for nipple reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Tierney; Jason P Hodde; Daniela I Changkuon
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-07-10

4.  The optimal reconstruction size of nipple-areola complex following breast implant in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Naomi Nagura-Inomata; Yoshiko Iwahira; Naoki Hayashi; Takako Komiya; Osamu Takahashi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-10

5.  Two-Blade Guillotine Technique for Nipple Graft Harvest.

Authors:  Allen Wei-Jiat Wong; Khong-Yik Chew; Bien-Keem Tan
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-09-15

6.  Nipple Reconstruction: A Novel Triple Flap Design.

Authors:  Sofie H H Krogsgaard; Lena F Carstensen; Jørn B Thomsen; Michael Rose
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 7.  Guiding Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction: Literature Review and Proposal of a New Decision-Making Algorithm.

Authors:  Guido Paolini; Guido Firmani; Francesca Briganti; Michail Sorotos; Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used for Assessing Breast Sensation after Mastectomy: Not Fit for Purpose.

Authors:  Hansje P Smeele; Rachel C H Dijkstra; Merel L Kimman; René R W J van der Hulst; Stefania M H Tuinder
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.