Literature DB >> 21460549

Optimization of biomass composition explains microbial growth-stoichiometry relationships.

Oskar Franklin1, Edward K Hall, Christina Kaiser, Tom J Battin, Andreas Richter.   

Abstract

Integrating microbial physiology and biomass stoichiometry opens far-reaching possibilities for linking microbial dynamics to ecosystem processes. For example, the growth-rate hypothesis (GRH) predicts positive correlations among growth rate, RNA content, and biomass phosphorus (P) content. Such relationships have been used to infer patterns of microbial activity, resource availability, and nutrient recycling in ecosystems. However, for microorganisms it is unclear under which resource conditions the GRH applies. We developed a model to test whether the response of microbial biomass stoichiometry to variable resource stoichiometry can be explained by a trade-off among cellular components that maximizes growth. The results show mechanistically why the GRH is valid under P limitation but not under N limitation. We also show why variability of growth rate-biomass stoichiometry relationships is lower under P limitation than under N or C limitation. These theoretical results are supported by experimental data on macromolecular composition (RNA, DNA, and protein) and biomass stoichiometry from two different bacteria. In addition, compared to a model with strictly homeostatic biomass, the optimization mechanism we suggest results in increased microbial N and P mineralization during organic-matter decomposition. Therefore, this mechanism may also have important implications for our understanding of nutrient cycling in ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21460549     DOI: 10.1086/657684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  14 in total

1.  Changes in nutrient stoichiometry, elemental homeostasis and growth rate of aquatic litter-associated fungi in response to inorganic nutrient supply.

Authors:  Vladislav Gulis; Kevin A Kuehn; Louie N Schoettle; Desiree Leach; Jonathan P Benstead; Amy D Rosemond
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Size evolution in microorganisms masks trade-offs predicted by the growth rate hypothesis.

Authors:  Isabelle Gounand; Tanguy Daufresne; Dominique Gravel; Corinne Bouvier; Thierry Bouvier; Marine Combe; Claire Gougat-Barbera; Franck Poly; Clara Torres-Barceló; Nicolas Mouquet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Land-use and soil depth affect resource and microbial stoichiometry in a tropical mountain rainforest region of southern Ecuador.

Authors:  Alexander Tischer; Karin Potthast; Ute Hamer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilms: carbon and energy flow contribute to the distinct biofilm growth state.

Authors:  Melinda E Clark; Zhili He; Alyssa M Redding; Marcin P Joachimiak; Jay D Keasling; Jizhong Z Zhou; Adam P Arkin; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Matthew W Fields
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Transcriptional changes underlying elemental stoichiometry shifts in a marine heterotrophic bacterium.

Authors:  Leong-Keat Chan; Ryan J Newton; Shalabh Sharma; Christa B Smith; Pratibha Rayapati; Alexander J Limardo; Christof Meile; Mary Ann Moran
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  A genomic perspective on stoichiometric regulation of soil carbon cycling.

Authors:  Wyatt H Hartman; Rongzhong Ye; William R Horwath; Susannah G Tringe
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Evolution of organismal stoichiometry in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Caroline B Turner; Brian D Wade; Justin R Meyer; Brooke A Sommerfeld; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 8.  Bridging Food Webs, Ecosystem Metabolism, and Biogeochemistry Using Ecological Stoichiometry Theory.

Authors:  Nina Welti; Maren Striebel; Amber J Ulseth; Wyatt F Cross; Stephen DeVilbiss; Patricia M Glibert; Laodong Guo; Andrew G Hirst; Jim Hood; John S Kominoski; Keeley L MacNeill; Andrew S Mehring; Jill R Welter; Helmut Hillebrand
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes?

Authors:  Wyatt H Hartman; Curtis J Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Phosphate and ATP uptake by lake bacteria: does taxonomical identity matter?

Authors:  Carina Rofner; Ruben Sommaruga; María Teresa Pérez
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.