Literature DB >> 21460403

From child health surveillance to child health promotion, and onwards: a tale of babies and bathwater.

Martin Bellman1, Selvarajan Vijeratnam.   

Abstract

Child health surveillance (CHS) has evolved greatly over the past 30 years from a proactive screening process by health professionals to a more passive approach of child health promotion (CHP), which places the main responsibility for detection of developmental problems on carers. The impetus for this change came from the Hall Report (1989), which reported a lack of evidence for CHS. Although research on developmental screening is sparse, some data show that use of structured methods for identifying deviations from normal increases the pick-up rate of abnormalities, compared with informal or parent-initiated methods. The majority of countries recommend a universal 'CHS' type of programme, in contrast to the UK and some other European countries. Alternatives to universal CHS include 'targeting' which, however, has been criticised for including too many 'normal' children and missing those who are most in need. CHS and CHP are basically primary care activities but require essential support from secondary paediatric services. There are concerns about the competence and numbers of general practitioners and health visitors who deliver child healthcare. Both these professional groups are under great pressure because of continuing reorganisations of the National Health Service in the UK. Politically driven agendae complicate the fundamental aim of enhancing child health at the primary level and it is vital to keep the focus on providing high-quality services to the most needy children. CHS has evolved beyond CHP to a Healthy Child Programme (HCP). Hopefully this is not an 'emperor's new clothes' situation and will improve outcomes. A major problem is the 'inverse care law', and reliance on carers runs the risk of excluding those children who need most input. Inequality is currently a headline problem and the change from CHS to HCP may not have helped. More research is urgently needed to resolve uncertainty about the application of these fundamental procedures for secondary preventive of childhood disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21460403     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.186668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  9 in total

Review 1.  Global perspective on early diagnosis and intervention for children with developmental delays and disabilities.

Authors:  Alfred L Scherzer; Meera Chhagan; Shuaib Kauchali; Ezra Susser
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  Predictive validity of a service-setting-based measure to identify infancy mental health problems: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Janni Ammitzbøll; Lau Caspar Thygesen; Bjørn E Holstein; Anette Andersen; Anne Mette Skovgaard
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  A Framework for Developing a Curriculum Regarding Autism Spectrum Disorders for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; David Lillystone; David Dossetor; Helen Wilkinson; Carolyn Kefford; John Eastwood; Siaw Teng Liaw
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

4.  Unidentified Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a major cause of school absence: surveillance outcomes from school-based clinics.

Authors:  Esther M Crawley; Alan M Emond; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Language and social/emotional problems identified at a universal developmental assessment at 30 months.

Authors:  Fiona Sim; John O'Dowd; Lucy Thompson; James Law; Susan Macmillan; Michelle Affleck; Christopher Gillberg; Philip Wilson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Construct validity of a service-setting based measure to identify mental health problems in infancy.

Authors:  Janni Ammitzbøll; Anne Mette Skovgaard; Bjørn E Holstein; Anette Andersen; Svend Kreiner; Tine Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  NASCITA Italian birth cohort study: a study protocol.

Authors:  Claudia Pansieri; Antonio Clavenna; Chiara Pandolfini; Michele Zanetti; Maria Grazia Calati; Daniela Miglio; Massimo Cartabia; Federica Zanetto; Maurizio Bonati
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Primary health care: comparing public health nursing models in ireland and norway.

Authors:  Anne Clancy; Patricia Leahy-Warren; Mary Rose Day; Helen Mulcahy
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2013-03-31

9.  Evidence for a delay in diagnosis of Wilms' tumour in the UK compared with Germany: implications for primary care for children.

Authors:  Kathy Pritchard-Jones; Norbert Graf; Harm van Tinteren; Alan Craft
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 3.791

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.