Literature DB >> 21459452

Repeat penetrating corneal transplantation in patients with keratoconus.

Thu-Lan Kelly1, Douglas J Coster, Keryn A Williams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine factors influencing penetrating corneal graft survival in patients receiving repeat grafts in the same eye after a failed first graft for keratoconus.
DESIGN: Large cohort study from a national register of corneal grafts, in which data were recorded prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up extended to 23 years. PARTICIPANTS: Follow-up was available for 229 regrafts performed in 177 eyes of 173 patients. Regrafts were performed more than once in 16 eyes.
METHODS: Corneal graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival plots and Cox proportional hazards regression, clustered by patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft survival.
RESULTS: Graft survival was significantly worse (P<0.001) for second (n = 176) and third or greater grafts (n = 20), compared with first grafts for keratoconus (n = 4871). Kaplan-Meier survivals at 1, 5, and 15 years postgrafting were 88%, 69%, and 46% for second grafts, and 65%, 49%, and 33% for third and subsequent grafts, respectively (P<0.001). Risk factors associated with graft failure of repeat grafts in multivariate analysis were the geographic location of surgery ("center"; P = 0.04), failure of the previous graft within 10 years of surgery (P = 0.02), recipient age at graft ≥60 years (P = 0.04), occurrence of rejection episodes (P = 0.007), and corneal neovascularization postoperatively (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat corneal grafts in eyes originally grafted for keratoconus showed better survival when the previous graft had survived ≥10 years, surgery was performed at a favorable location, the recipient was <60 years old at grafting, and graft rejection and neovascularization were circumvented. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21459452     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical correlates of common corneal neovascular diseases: a literature review.

Authors:  Nizar Saleh Abdelfattah; Mohamed Amgad; Amira A Zayed; Hamdy Salem; Ahmed E Elkhanany; Heba Hussein; Nawal Abd El-Baky
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Outcome of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with an Ahmed glaucoma valve.

Authors:  Patrick J Chiam; Robert Cheeseman; Vivian W Ho; Vito Romano; Anshoo Choudhary; Mark Batterbury; Stephen B Kaye; Colin E Willoughby
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  New clinical pathways for keratoconus.

Authors:  D M Gore; A J Shortt; B D Allan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Endothelial keratoplasty versus repeat penetrating keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Tao Zhang; Yan Wei Kang; Jing Liang He; Shi-Ming Li; Shao-Wei Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Small-Incision Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Intracorneal Concave Lenticule Implantation in Patients With Keratoconus.

Authors:  He Jin; Miao He; Hongshan Liu; Xiaoying Zhong; Junshu Wu; Liangping Liu; Hui Ding; Chi Zhang; Xingwu Zhong
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 6.  Progress in Research on the Role of FGF in the Formation and Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization.

Authors:  Mengji Chen; Licheng Bao; Mengying Zhao; Jiarong Cao; Haihua Zheng
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.