Literature DB >> 21459354

Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.

Ahmed M Megreya1, Markus Bindemann, Catriona Havard.   

Abstract

Research on sex differences in face recognition has reported mixed results, on balance suggesting an advantage for female observers. However, it is not clear whether this advantage is specific to face processing or reflects a more general superiority effect in episodic memory. The current study therefore examined sex differences with a face-matching task that eliminates memory demands. Across two experiments, female but not male observers showed an own-sex advantage on match trials, in which two pictures have to be identified as the same person. This advantage was present for whole faces and when only the internal or external facial features were shown. Female observers were also more accurate in these three conditions on mismatch encounters, in which two photographs have to be identified as different people, but this reflects a more general effect that is present for male and female faces. These findings converge with claims of a female advantage in face recognition and demonstrate that this effect persists when memory demands are eliminated. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21459354     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  17 in total

1.  Greater visual averaging of face identity for own-gender faces.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert; Ben Gautrey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

2.  Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The social network-network: size is predicted by brain structure and function in the amygdala and paralimbic regions.

Authors:  Rebecca Von Der Heide; Govinda Vyas; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Face gender modulates women's brain activity during face encoding.

Authors:  Johanna Lovén; Joakim Svärd; Natalie C Ebner; Agneta Herlitz; Håkan Fischer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Face matching in a long task: enforced rest and desk-switching cannot maintain identification accuracy.

Authors:  Hamood M Alenezi; Markus Bindemann; Matthew C Fysh; Robert A Johnston
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  The 20 item prosopagnosia index (PI20): relationship with the Glasgow face-matching test.

Authors:  Punit Shah; Sophie Sowden; Anne Gaule; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Recognizing age-separated face images: humans and machines.

Authors:  Daksha Yadav; Richa Singh; Mayank Vatsa; Afzel Noore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bayesian regression-based developmental norms for the Benton Facial Recognition Test in males and females.

Authors:  Leah A L Wang; John D Herrington; Birkan Tunç; Robert T Schultz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-08

9.  Anterior temporal face patches: a meta-analysis and empirical study.

Authors:  Rebecca J Von Der Heide; Laura M Skipper; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sex differences in the functional connectivity of the amygdalae in association with cortisol.

Authors:  Lydia Kogler; Veronika I Müller; Eva-Maria Seidel; Roland Boubela; Klaudius Kalcher; Ewald Moser; Ute Habel; Ruben C Gur; Simon B Eickhoff; Birgit Derntl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.