Literature DB >> 21458921

The dimensionality of pain: palliative care and chronic pain patients differ in their reports of pain intensity and pain interference.

Peter M Fayers1, Marianne J Hjermstad, Pål Klepstad, Jon Håvard Loge, Augusto Caraceni, Geoffrey W Hanks, Petter Borchgrevink, Stein Kaasa.   

Abstract

The accurate, precise, and consistent assessment of pain is of particular importance in palliative care. The European Palliative Care Research Collaborative is developing a computer-based pain assessment instrument and has been evaluating the content and dimensionality of existing pain questionnaires. The most important dimensions of pain are intensity and interference. However, since pain interference is a consequence of and largely reflects pain intensity, we postulated that it might either provide information to enhance the evaluation of intensity, or that an overall summary measure of pain severity could be constructed by combining the 2 dimensions. Cancer patients in palliative care (n=395) and chronic pain patients (n=168) completed questionnaires that included 23 pain items culled from existing questionnaires. Psychometric analyses confirmed the existence of 2 main dimensions, intensity and interference, and also guided identification of items that contributed most strongly to these dimensions. However, there was strong evidence that the relationship between the intensity and the interference items differs markedly in palliative care patients compared to chronic pain patients. As hypothesized, there was strong correlation between intensity and interference, lending support to the possibility that, for some purposes, these dimensions may be combined to provide a higher-level summary measure of patients' pain experience. We conclude that these dimensions should be kept distinct when assessing patients in general, although for a single type of patient (such as palliative care patients), it may be possible to regard intensity and interference as contributing to an overall measure of pain severity.
Copyright © 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21458921     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  5 in total

1.  Reliability and concurrent validity of the Palliative Outcome Scale, the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, and the Brief Pain Inventory.

Authors:  Marta Pelayo-Alvarez; Santiago Perez-Hoyos; Yolanda Agra-Varela
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Establishing a common metric for self-reported pain: linking BPI Pain Interference and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale scores to the PROMIS Pain Interference metric.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Benjamin D Schalet; Michael A Kallen; Joshua P Rutsohn; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Pain assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Winnie Dunn; James W Griffith; M Tracy Morrison; Jennifer Tanquary; Dory Sabata; David Victorson; Leeanne M Carey; Joy C Macdermid; Brian J Dudgeon; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Development and evaluation of the PI-G: a three-scale measure based on the German translation of the PROMIS ® pain interference item bank.

Authors:  Erik Farin; Michaela Nagl; Lukas Gramm; Katja Heyduck; Manuela Glattacker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Palliative and end-of-life care research in Scotland 2006-2015: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Anne M Finucane; Emma Carduff; Jean Lugton; Stephen Fenning; Bridget Johnston; Marie Fallon; David Clark; Juliet A Spiller; Scott A Murray
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.