Literature DB >> 21458647

Influence of different surface conditioning protocols on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.

Jatyr Pisani-Proença1, Maria Carolina Guilherme Erhardt, Regina Amaral, Luiz Felipe Valandro, Marco Antonio Bottino, Ramón Del Castillo-Salmerón.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: According to manufacturers, bonding with self-adhesive resin cements can be achieved without any pretreatment steps such as etching, priming, or bonding. However, the benefit of saving time with these simplified luting systems may be realized at the expense of compromising the bonding capacity.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether different dentin conditioning protocols influence the bond performance of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Flat dentin surfaces from 48 human molars were divided into 4 groups (n=12): 1) control, no conditioning; 2) H(3)PO(4), etching with 37% H(3)PO(4) for 15 seconds; 3) SEBond, bonding with self-etching primer adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond); and 4) EDTA, etching with 0.1M EDTA for 60 seconds. The specimens from each dentin pre-treatment were bonded using the self-adhesive cements RelyX Unicem, Maxcem or Multilink Sprint (n=4). The resin-cement-dentin specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 7 days, and serially sectioned to produce beam specimens of 1.0 mm(2) cross-sectional area. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing was performed at 1.0 mm/min. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons test (α=.05). Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope (x40) and classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive. Additional bonded interfaces were evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
RESULTS: Cement-dentin μTBS was affected by the dentin conditioning approach (P<.001). RelyX Unicem attained statistically similar bond strengths to all pre-treated dentin surfaces. H(3)PO(4)-etching prior to the application of Maxcem resulted in bond strength values that were significantly higher than the other groups. The lowest μTBS were attained when luting Multilink Sprint per manufacturers' recommendations, while H(3)PO(4)-etching produced the highest values followed by Clearfil SE bonding and EDTA. SEM observations disclosed an enhanced potential of the self-adhesive cements to form a hybrid layer when applied following manufacturer's instructions.
CONCLUSIONS: When evaluated self-adhesive resin cements are used, selectively etching dentin with H(3)PO(4) prior to luting results in the most effective bonding.
Copyright © 2011 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21458647     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60037-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  10 in total

1.  Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin using different adhesion protocols.

Authors:  Luiz-Roberto-Dallari Junior; Kusai Baroudi; Leonardo-Dos Santos Barroso; Milton-Edson Miranda; Rafael-Pino Vitti; William-Cunha Brandt
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-01-01

2.  Influence of root dentin treatment on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts.

Authors:  E Baena; A Flores; L Ceballos
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  The effect of dentin desensitizers and Nd:YAG laser pre-treatment on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin.

Authors:  Ozlem Acar; Duygu Tuncer; Bulem Yuzugullu; Cigdem Celik
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Effect of Curing Mode on Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Cement to Composite Blocks.

Authors:  Jin-Young Kim; Ga-Young Cho; Byoung-Duck Roh; Yooseok Shin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Bond strength and adhesive interfacial micromorphology of self-adhesive resin cements: Effect of reduced times of pre-etching.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shafiei; Sahba Kamran; Mahtab Memarpour; Tayebeh Aghaei
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-11-01

6.  Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin.

Authors:  Hosea Lalrin Muana; Mohannad Nassar; Ahmad Dargham; Noriko Hiraishi; Junji Tagami
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-05-29

7.  Effectiveness of dentin pre-treatment on bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements compared to an etch-and-rinse system: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Milad Hammal; Zdeněk Chlup; Tomáš Ingr; Ján Staněk; Radek Mounajjed
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Effect of dentin pretreatment and curing mode on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Youm; Kyoung-Hwa Jung; Sung-Ae Son; Yong-Hoon Kwon; Jeong-Kil Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Adhesion of 10-MDP containing resin cements to dentin with and without the etch-and-rinse technique.

Authors:  Volkan Turp; Deniz Sen; Betul Tuncelli; Mutlu Ozcan
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Simple methods to enhance bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements.

Authors:  Sung-Ae Son
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2015-10-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.