Literature DB >> 21458473

Observation-execution matching and action inhibition in human primary motor cortex during viewing of speech-related lip movements or listening to speech.

Takenobu Murakami1, Julia Restle, Ulf Ziemann.   

Abstract

One influential theory posits that language has evolved from gestural communication through observation-execution matching processes in the mirror neuron system (MNS). This theory predicts that observation of speech-related lip movements or even listening to speech would result in effector and task specific increase of the excitability of the corresponding motor representations in the primary motor cortex (M1), since actual movement execution is known be effector and task specific. In addition, effector and task specific inhibitory control mechanisms should be important to prevent overt motor activation during observation of speech-related lip movements or listening to speech. We tested these predictions by applying focal transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left M1 of 12 healthy right-handed volunteers and measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in a lip muscle, the right orbicularis oris (OO), vs. a hand muscle, the right first dorsal interosseus (FDI). We found that MEP and SICI increased only in the OO but not in the FDI during viewing of speech-related lip movements or listening to speech. These changes were highly task specific because they were absent when lip movements non-related to speech were viewed. Finally, the increase in MEP amplitude in the OO correlated inversely with accuracy of speech perception, i.e. the MEP increase was directly related to task difficulty. The MEP findings support the notion that observation-execution matching is an operating process in the putative human MNS that might have been fundamental for evolution of language. Furthermore, the SICI findings provide evidence that inhibitory mechanisms are recruited to prevent unwanted overt motor activation during action observation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21458473     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  21 in total

1.  Left dorsal speech stream components and their contribution to phonological processing.

Authors:  Takenobu Murakami; Christian A Kell; Julia Restle; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.

Authors:  Takenobu Murakami; Mitsunari Abe; Winnugroho Wiratman; Juri Fujiwara; Masahiro Okamoto; Tomomi Mizuochi-Endo; Toshiki Iwabuchi; Michiru Makuuchi; Akira Yamashita; Amanda Tiksnadi; Fang-Yu Chang; Hitoshi Kubo; Nozomu Matsuda; Shunsuke Kobayashi; Satoshi Eifuku; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Listening to speech recruits specific tongue motor synergies as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation and tissue-Doppler ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  A D'Ausilio; L Maffongelli; E Bartoli; M Campanella; E Ferrari; J Berry; L Fadiga
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  High-level language processing regions are not engaged in action observation or imitation.

Authors:  Brianna L Pritchett; Caitlyn Hoeflin; Kami Koldewyn; Eyal Dechter; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  An interactive model of auditory-motor speech perception.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Stimulating the lip motor cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Riikka Möttönen; Jack Rogers; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Using TMS to study the role of the articulatory motor system in speech perception.

Authors:  Riikka Möttönen; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.773

8.  Motor excitability during visual perception of known and unknown spoken languages.

Authors:  Swathi Swaminathan; Mairéad MacSweeney; Rowan Boyles; Dafydd Waters; Kate E Watkins; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Auditory-motor processing of speech sounds.

Authors:  Riikka Möttönen; Rebekah Dutton; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Utility of TMS to understand the neurobiology of speech.

Authors:  Takenobu Murakami; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.