Literature DB >> 21458330

Plate removal following orthognathic surgery.

Bart Falter1, Serge Schepers, Luc Vrielinck, Ivo Lambrichts, Constantinus Politis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to analyze outcomes with miniplates in orthognathic surgery and define risk factors resulting in plate removal. STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical files of 570 orthognathic surgery patients operated between 2004 and 2009 were reviewed: 203 had a bimaxillary operation, 310 a lower jaw osteotomy, and 57 an upper jaw osteotomy. Age, sex, and jaw movement were analyzed. Reasons for hardware removal were recorded.
RESULTS: Hardware was removed in 157 patients (27.5%). Seventy-eight patients (13.7%) needed removal because of plate-related infection; 66 (11.6%) because of clinical irritation; 5 (0.9%) for dental implant placement; and 8 (1.4%) for other reasons. Average time between operation and removal was 9.9 months. More women (31.7%) than men (20.3%) had plates removed, but age was not a factor except with infection.
CONCLUSIONS: More than a quarter of patients developed complications from plates and screws, necessitating their removal, and infection occurred in 13.7%. Prompt removal constituted adequate management.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21458330     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  9 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Post-operative Infection Following Single Piece Osteotomy.

Authors:  P U Abdul Wahab; P Senthil Nathan; M Madhulaxmi; M R Muthusekhar; Soh Chen Loong; Rajendra Prabhu Abhinav
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Effects of degradable osteosynthesis plates of MgYREZr alloy on cell function of human osteoblasts, fibroblasts and osteosarcoma cells.

Authors:  Hendrik Naujokat; Aydin Gülses; Jörg Wiltfang; Yahya Açil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Visibility of mandibular canal on panoramic radiograph after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO).

Authors:  Constantinus Politis; Xiomara Botero Ramírez; Yi Sun; Ivo Lambrichts; Neil Heath; Jimoh Olubanwo Agbaje
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Experience with Anterior Maxillary Osteotomy Techniques: A Prospective Study of 20 Cases.

Authors:  Ashish Gupta; Sneha D Sharma; Vimanyu Kataria; Pankaj Bansal; Rahul Sharma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-05-13

Review 5.  Unfavourable outcomes in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Krishnamurthy Bonanthaya; P Anantanarayanan
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05

6.  Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B Gareb; N B van Bakelen; G J Buijs; J Jansma; J G A M de Visscher; Th J M Hoppenreijs; J E Bergsma; B van Minnen; B Stegenga; R R M Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pain Complaints in Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Jimoh Agbaje; Jonathan Luyten; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  Optimal effective-site concentration of remifentanil for sedation during plate removal of maxilla.

Authors:  Jeong-Hoon Park; Ji-Young Yoon; Eun-Jung Kim; Ji-Uk Yoon; Byung-Moon Choi; Ji-Hye Ahn
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-10-31

Review 9.  Titanium or Biodegradable Osteosynthesis in Maxillofacial Surgery? In Vitro and In Vivo Performances.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B Van Bakelen; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke Van Minnen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.967

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.