Literature DB >> 21457940

Impact of tricuspid valve regurgitation in patients treated with implantable left ventricular assist devices.

Valentino Piacentino1, Matthew L Williams, Tim Depp, Karla Garcia-Huerta, Laura Blue, Andrew J Lodge, G Burkhard Mackensen, Madhav Swaminathan, Joseph G Rogers, Carmelo A Milano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The progression of tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) and the impact of preoperative TR on postoperative outcomes in patients having left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has not been studied.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-six consecutive implantable LVAD procedures were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 137 patients comprised the final study group with complete preimplant characteristics, before and after echocardiogram assessment of TR, and outcomes data. Patients were divided into two groups: insignificant TR (iTR) consisting of those with preimplant TR grades of none, trace, and mild; and significant TR (sTR) consisting of those with moderate and severe TR grades.
RESULTS: Relative to patients with iTR, patients with sTR were younger (53.6±12.8 versus 58.4±10.0 years, p=0.02) and more commonly had nonischemic cardiomyopathies (69% versus 38%, p<0.001). The preimplant incidence of iTR and sTR was 51% and 49%. Immediately after the LVAD implant procedure, TR did not significantly change. At late follow-up (156±272 days), 32% had moderate or severe TR. Also, 41% of the original sTR group persisted with moderate or severe TR. Relative to patients with iTR, patients with sTR required longer postimplant intravenous inotropic support (8.5 versus 5.0 days, p=0.02), more commonly required a temporary right ventricular assist device, and had a longer postimplant length of hospital stay (27.0 versus 20.0 days, p=0.03). There was also a trend toward decreased survival for sTR versus iTR (log rank=0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Tricuspid regurgitation is not reduced immediately after LVAD implantation. Significant TR is associated with longer postimplant inotropic support and length of hospital stay.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457940     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  19 in total

Review 1.  Role of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices: the Importance of Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Luca Longobardo; Christopher Kramer; Scipione Carerj; Concetta Zito; Renuka Jain; Valentin Suma; Vinay Thohan; Nasir Sulemanjee; Frank X Downey; Bijoy K Khandheria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Hemodynamics of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures at LVAD implantation.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Nikhil Narang; Jerry Nnanabu; Daniel Rodgers; Jayant Raikhelkar; Sara Kalantari; Bryan Smith; Ann Nguyen; Ben Chung; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Gene Kim; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.620

Review 3.  Mechanical circulatory support: devices, outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Carmelo A Milano; Alan A Simeone
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Effect of Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery With Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Takeo Fujino; Teruhiko Imamura; Daisuke Nitta; Gene Kim; Bryan Smith; Sara Kalantari; Ann Nguyen; Ben Chung; Nikhil Narang; Luise Holzhauser; Colleen Juricek; Daniel Rodgers; Tae Song; Takeyoshi Ota; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Daniel Burkhoff; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Medical management of patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Adam D Devore; Robert J Mentz; Chetan B Patel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-02

Review 6.  Impact of tricuspid valve surgery at the time of left ventricular assist device insertion on postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Salil V Deo; Soon J Park
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Relationship of tricuspid repair at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation and survival.

Authors:  Robert J Brewer; Rafael Cabrera; Mazen El-Atrache; Amna Zafar; Tara N Hrobowski; Hassan M Nemeh; Yelena Selektor; Gaetano Paone; Celeste T Williams; Mauricio Velez; Cristina Tita; Jeffrey A Morgan; David E Lanfear
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 1.595

Review 8.  Current practice in patient selecting for long-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  M S Halbreiner; E Soltesz; R Starling; N Moazami
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-04

Review 9.  The practical role of echocardiography in selection, implantation, and management of patients requiring LVAD therapy.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Todaro; Bijoy K Khandheria; Timothy E Paterick; Matt M Umland; Vinay Thohan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Limited Utility of Tricuspid Valve Repair at the Time of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Howard K Song; Jill M Gelow; James Mudd; Christopher Chien; Frederick A Tibayan; Kathryn Hollifield; David Naftel; James Kirklin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.