Literature DB >> 21457456

Stable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews.

G Chen1, S Chen, X Y Zhang, R P Jiang, Y Liu, F H Shi, T M Xu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify a stable and reproducible reference region to superimpose serial maxillary dental models in adult extraction cases. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Fifteen adult volunteers were enrolled.
METHODS: To reduce protrusion, bilateral maxillary first premolars were extracted in all volunteers. Each volunteer received six miniscrews, including two loaded miniscrews used to retract anterior teeth and four unloaded miniscrews. Impressions for maxillary models were taken at T1 (1 week after miniscrew placement) and T2 (17 months later). Dental models were created and then scanned using a laser scanner. Stability of the miniscrews was evaluated, and dental models were registered using stationary miniscrews. The palatal region, where deviation was within 0.5 mm in all subjects, was determined to be the stable region. Reproducibility of the new palatal region for 3D digital model superimposition was evaluated.
RESULTS: Deviation of the medial 2/3 of the palatal region between the third rugae and the line in contact with the distal surface of the bilateral maxillary first molars was within 0.5 mm. Tooth movement of 15 subjects was measured to evaluate the validity of the new 3D superimposition method. Displacements were 8.18 ± 2.94 mm (central incisor) and 2.25 ± 0.73 mm (first molar) measured by miniscrew superimposition, while values of 7.81 ± 2.53 mm (central incisor) and 2.29 ± 1.03 mm (first molar) were measured using the 3D palatal vault regional superimposition method; no significant difference was observed.
CONCLUSION: The medial 2/3 of the third rugae and the regional palatal vault dorsal to it is a stable region to register 3D digital models for evaluation of orthodontic tooth movement in adult patients.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457456     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  26 in total

1.  Does anchorage loss differ with 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems?

Authors:  Yassir A Yassir; Grant T McIntyre; Ahmed M El-Angbawi; David R Bearn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Contact of the incisive canal and upper central incisors causing root resorption after retraction with orthodontic mini-implants: A CBCT study.

Authors:  Yichen Pan; Si Chen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of achieved and predicted tooth movement of maxillary first molars and central incisors: First premolar extraction treatment with Invisalign.

Authors:  Fan-Fan Dai; Tian-Min Xu; Guang Shu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Biomechanical model registration for monitoring and simulating large orthodontic tooth movements in the maxilla and mandible.

Authors:  Falko Schmidt; Fatih Kilic; Catrin Verena Gerhart; Bernd Georg Lapatki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Luis T Huanca Ghislanzoni; Marcelo Regis Gomes; Carlotta Danesi; Roberta Lione; Tung Nguyen; James A McNamara; Paola Cozza; Lorenzo Franchi; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Effects of Type and Amount of Orthodontic Tooth Movement on Digital Model Superimposition Accuracy.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Farhad Salmanpour
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-12

8.  Effectiveness of modified periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics in skeletal class II malocclusion treated by a camouflage approach.

Authors:  Xuedong Wang; Mei Mei; Gaofeng Han; Qingxian Luan; Yanheng Zhou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  Three-dimensional evaluation of tooth movement in Class II malocclusions treated without extraction by orthodontic mini-implant anchorage.

Authors:  Dler Ali; Hnd Mohammed; Seung-Hwan Koo; Kyung-Hwa Kang; Sang-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures.

Authors:  Georgios Vasilakos; Roman Schilling; Demetrios Halazonetis; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.