BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administrative databases could be useful in studying the epidemiology of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); however, there is no information regarding the validity of the diagnostic code in administrative databases. The aims of this study were to determine the validity of administrative data for a diagnosis of PSC and generate algorithms for the identification of PSC patients. METHODS: The sensitivity (Se) and positive predictive value (PPV) of a PSC diagnosis based on administrative data from 2000 to 2003 were determined through chart review data. Algorithms were developed by considering variables associated with PSC and coding details. A logistic regression model was constructed using covariates associated with PSC. Based on this model, each subject was assigned a probability of having PSC. A cutoff value was selected that maximized the Se and specificity (Sp) of correctly predicting PSC cases. RESULTS: In the administrative data, the initial Se and PPV were 83.7 and 7.2% respectively. The optimal algorithm included one PSC code and one inflammatory bowel disease code and had Se 56% and PPV 59%. Overall, the algorithms yielded inadequate PPV and Se estimates to identify a cohort of true PSC cases. The predictive model was constructed using six covariates. For this model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 93.5%. A cutoff of 0.0729 was used, which maximized the Se 81.9% and Sp 90.7%; however, the PPV was 41.0%. CONCLUSION: An algorithm for the identification of true PSC cases from administrative data was not possible. We recommend that PSC receives a distinct ICD code from ascending cholangitis.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administrative databases could be useful in studying the epidemiology of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); however, there is no information regarding the validity of the diagnostic code in administrative databases. The aims of this study were to determine the validity of administrative data for a diagnosis of PSC and generate algorithms for the identification of PSC patients. METHODS: The sensitivity (Se) and positive predictive value (PPV) of a PSC diagnosis based on administrative data from 2000 to 2003 were determined through chart review data. Algorithms were developed by considering variables associated with PSC and coding details. A logistic regression model was constructed using covariates associated with PSC. Based on this model, each subject was assigned a probability of having PSC. A cutoff value was selected that maximized the Se and specificity (Sp) of correctly predicting PSC cases. RESULTS: In the administrative data, the initial Se and PPV were 83.7 and 7.2% respectively. The optimal algorithm included one PSC code and one inflammatory bowel disease code and had Se 56% and PPV 59%. Overall, the algorithms yielded inadequate PPV and Se estimates to identify a cohort of true PSC cases. The predictive model was constructed using six covariates. For this model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 93.5%. A cutoff of 0.0729 was used, which maximized the Se 81.9% and Sp 90.7%; however, the PPV was 41.0%. CONCLUSION: An algorithm for the identification of true PSC cases from administrative data was not possible. We recommend that PSC receives a distinct ICD code from ascending cholangitis.
Authors: Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Tianxi Cai; Guergana Savova; Su-Chun Cheng; Pei Chen; Raul Guzman Perez; Vivian S Gainer; Shawn N Murphy; Peter Szolovits; Zongqi Xia; Stanley Shaw; Susanne Churchill; Elizabeth W Karlson; Isaac Kohane; Robert M Plenge; Katherine P Liao Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Su-Chun Cheng; Tianxi Cai; Andrew Cagan; Vivian S Gainer; Peter Szolovits; Stanley Y Shaw; Susanne Churchill; Elizabeth W Karlson; Shawn N Murphy; Isaac Kohane; Katherine P Liao Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Stephen G Fung; Richard Webster; M Ellen Kuenzig; Braden D Knight; Michelle Batthish; Cal Robinson; Rahul Chanchlani; Eric I Benchimol; Carolina Jimenez-Rivera Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 7.046
Authors: Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Andrew Cagan; Vivian S Gainer; Su-Chun Cheng; Tianxi Cai; Peter Szolovits; Stanley Y Shaw; Susanne Churchill; Elizabeth W Karlson; Shawn N Murphy; Isaac Kohane; Katherine P Liao Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Jennifer Drahos; Jeffrey J Vanwormer; Robert T Greenlee; Ola Landgren; Jill Koshiol Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Jack X Q Pang; Erin Ross; Meredith A Borman; Scott Zimmer; Gilaad G Kaplan; Steven J Heitman; Mark G Swain; Kelly W Burak; Hude Quan; Robert P Myers Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.067