Literature DB >> 21457175

Emergency department consultations for patients with neurological emergencies.

C K Hansen1, J Fisher, N Joyce, J A Edlow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The spectrum of neurological emergencies that front-line physicians encounter is diverse. Appropriate assessment and neurological consultation is essential to good patient outcomes because many of these conditions depend on the rapid initiation of proper therapy.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed patients for whom the emergency physician elected to consult a neurologist to categorize the types of complaints, resources utilized, patient disposition and final diagnoses.
RESULTS: Of the 500 patients analyzed in our study, the most common chief complaints were focal weakness (22%), headache (18.2%), dizziness or vertigo (16%), and seizure (14.2%). The most common reasons for neurological consultation were specific symptom (70.6%), concern for a specific diagnosis (17.4%), specific radiologic finding (9.2%), and ambiguity in the diagnosis (2.8%). Overall stroke accounted for 18.6% of the cases in our study. Non-contrast brain computed tomography was the most common imaging study (72.2%), and 37.0% of patients received advanced neuroimaging. The presentation of patients varied as 47% presented without having been seen by another healthcare professional, 24% were referred to the emergency department (ED) following by some other outpatient provider for evaluation, and 29% were transferred from another ED.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neurological emergencies are common and consume a disproportionate amount of resources in the ED. Emergency physician training must target the modern evaluation of patients with a large variety of neurological emergencies and place special emphasis on the evaluation of patients with weakness, seizures, headache, and dizziness.
© 2011 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology © 2011 EFNS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457175     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03390.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Focal point emergency departments].

Authors:  R Lange; S Popp; F Erbguth
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Avoiding misdiagnosis in patients with neurological emergencies.

Authors:  Jennifer V Pope; Jonathan A Edlow
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 1.112

3.  Unmet Acute Treatment Needs From the 2017 Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment Study.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Sagar Munjal; Dawn C Buse; Aftab Alam; Kristina M Fanning; Michael L Reed; Todd J Schwedt; David W Dodick
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.887

4.  Lost diagnoses in not otherwise specified headache in Emergency Department.

Authors:  Antonio Granato; Laura D'Acunto; Maria Elisa Morelli; Giulia Bellavita; Franco Cominotto; Paolo Manganotti
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.396

Review 5.  Simulation in Neurocritical Care: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Nicholas A Morris; Barry M Czeisler; Aarti Sarwal
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  A prospective evaluation of indications for neurological consultation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Christopher K Hansen; Jonathan Fisher; Nina R Joyce; Jonathan A Edlow
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-07-25

Review 7.  Diagnostic Error in Neuro-ophthalmology: Avenues to Improve.

Authors:  Elena A Muro-Fuentes; Leanne Stunkel
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.030

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.