Literature DB >> 21457122

Communication strategies and timeliness of response to life critical telemetry alarms.

Kimberly A Bonzheim1, Rani I Gebara, Bridget M O'Hare, R Darin Ellis, Monique A Brand, Salil D Balar, Rita Stockman, Annette M Sciberras, David E Haines.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A centralized electrocardiogram telemetry monitoring system (TMS) facilitates early identification of critical arrhythmias and acute medical decompensation. Timely intervention can only be performed if abnormalities are communicated rapidly to the direct caregiver. The study objectives were to measure effectiveness of bi-directional voice communication badges versus one-way alphanumeric pagers for telemetry alarm response and communication loop closure.
METHODS: A sequential observational pilot study of nursing response to TMS alarms compared communication technologies on four nursing units in a 1,061 bed tertiary care hospital with 264 TMS channels of telemetry over a 2-year period. Subsequently, the communication technologies were compared in a randomized fashion on a 68-bed progressive cardiac care unit. Caregivers were blinded to the protocol. All alarm responses were recorded during two periods using either pagers or voice communication devices. Alarm response time and closure of the communication loop were analyzed in a blinded fashion.
RESULTS: The direct communication functionality of the badge significantly shortened the time to first contact, time to completion, and rate of closure of the communication loop in both the pilot and study phases. Median time to first contact with the communication badge was 0.5  min, compared to 1.6  min with pager communication (p < 0.0003). Communication loop closure was achieved in 100% of clinical alarms using the badge versus 19% with the pager (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Communication badge technology reduced alarm time to first contact and completion as well as facilitated communication loop closures. Immediate two-way communication significantly impacted practice, alarm management, and resulted in faster bedside care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457122      PMCID: PMC3136730          DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  14 in total

1.  Communication in the emergency department: separating the signal from the noise.

Authors:  Charles A Vincent; Robert L Wears
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-05-06       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 2.  Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the "chain of survival" concept. A statement for health professionals from the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee and the Emergency Cardiac Care Committee, American Heart Association.

Authors:  R O Cummins; J P Ornato; W H Thies; P E Pepe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Wireless technology improves nursing workflow and communications.

Authors:  Susan Breslin; William Greskovich; Fran Turisco
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Fostering synergy: a nurse-managed remote telemetry model.

Authors:  Terry Reilly; Diane Humbrecht
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.708

6.  Very high survival among patients defibrillated at an early stage after in-hospital ventricular fibrillation on wards with and without monitoring facilities.

Authors:  Johan Herlitz; Soveig Aune; Angela Bång; Martin Fredriksson; Ann-Britt Thorén; Lars Ekström; Stig Holmberg
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Authors:  Barbara J Drew; Robert M Califf; Marjorie Funk; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Mitchell W Krucoff; Michael M Laks; Peter W Macfarlane; Claire Sommargren; Steven Swiryn; George F Van Hare
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Value of radiotelemetry in a community hospital.

Authors:  D J Lipskis; K N Dannehl; M E Silverman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Utility of in-hospital cardiac remote telemetry in patients with unexplained syncope.

Authors:  Juan Benezet-Mazuecos; Borja Ibanez; Jose Manuel Rubio; Felipe Navarro; Edita Martín; Jose Romero; Jeronimo Farre
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; Harlan M Krumholz; Graham Nichol; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Patient load effects on response time to critical arrhythmias in cardiac telemetry: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Noa Segall; Gene Hobbs; Christopher B Granger; Amanda E Anderson; Alberto S Bonifacio; Jeffrey M Taekman; Melanie C Wright
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Effect of Remote Cardiac Monitoring System Design on Response Time to Critical Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Noa Segall; Jeffrey A Joines; Ron'Nisha D Baldwin; Diane Bresch; Lauren G Coggins; Suzanne Janzen; Jill R Engel; Melanie C Wright
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.929

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.