Literature DB >> 21456957

Morphometric analysis of craniofacial features in mono- and dizygotic twins discordant for unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Alexis Y Tessler1, Lorenzo Franchi, James A McNamara, Tiziano Baccetti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare craniofacial differences between twins discordant for surgically repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) during the developmental ages and to test the effect of zygosity on the shape and size of the craniofacial skeleton of the same twins by means of thin plate spline (TPS) analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral and posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric films from 19 sets of monozygotic (MZ) twins (15 male and 4 female) and 10 dizygotic (DZ) twins (7 male and 3 female) were analyzed. TPS analysis evaluated statistically significant differences in the craniofacial shape and size between affected and unaffected twins within MZ and DZ twin couples.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in craniofacial shape or size between CLP and non-CLP MZ or DZ twins were observed. The level of morphological similarity in CLP vs non-CLP MZ twins was statistically greater than in DZ twins.
CONCLUSIONS: Morphometric analysis showed that surgically repaired CLP does not produce significant shape or size differences in the craniofacial features of MZ or DZ twins discordant for unilateral CLP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21456957      PMCID: PMC8916174          DOI: 10.2319/121710-725.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  15 in total

1.  Deformations of the midfacial complex in twins with orofacial clefts.

Authors:  G D Singh; Elizabeth Kutcipal; James A McNamara
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2003-07

2.  CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY IN SIX PAIRS OF MONOZYGOTIC TWINS DISCORDANT FOR CLEFT LIP AND PALATE.

Authors:  R B ROSS; T B COUPE
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc (Tor)       Date:  1965-03

3.  Epigenetic influences may explain dental differences in monozygotic twin pairs.

Authors:  G C Townsend; L Richards; T Hughes; S Pinkerton; W Schwerdt
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.291

4.  Twins with clefts: a descriptive statistical analysis of selected variables.

Authors:  S Hay; D A Wehrung
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1971-10

5.  The clinical implications of facial growth in cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  R B Ross
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1970-01

6.  An analysis of quality of life in 130 families having small children with cleft lip/palate using the impact on family scale.

Authors:  F-J Kramer; C Baethge; B Sinikovic; H Schliephake
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Craniofacial morphology in twins discordant for cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  D G Cronin; W S Hunter
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1980-04

8.  Parental craniofacial morphology in orofacial clefting.

Authors:  G T McIntyre; P A Mossey
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age.

Authors:  M Mars; W J Houston
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1990-01

Review 10.  Genetic and environmental influences on human dental variation: a critical evaluation of studies involving twins.

Authors:  Grant Townsend; Toby Hughes; Michelle Luciano; Michelle Bockmann; Alan Brook
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 2.633

View more
  1 in total

1.  Craniofacial Analysis May Indicate Co-Occurrence of Skeletal Malocclusions and Associated Risks in Development of Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Denise K Liberton; Payal Verma; Konstantinia Almpani; Peter W Fung; Rashmi Mishra; Snehlata Oberoi; Figen Ç Şenel; James K Mah; John Huang; Bonnie L Padwa; Janice S Lee
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2020-01-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.