Literature DB >> 21456626

Influence of nano-carrier architecture on in vitro siRNA delivery performance and in vivo biodistribution: polyplexes vs micelleplexes.

Dana J Gary1, Hoyoung Lee, Rahul Sharma, Jae-Sung Lee, Youngwook Kim, Zheng Yun Cui, Di Jia, Valorie D Bowman, Paul R Chipman, Lei Wan, Yi Zou, Guangzhao Mao, Keunchil Park, Brittney-Shea Herbert, Stephen F Konieczny, You-Yeon Won.   

Abstract

Micelle-based siRNA carriers ("micelleplexes") were prepared from the A-B-C triblock copolymer poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(n-butyl acrylate)-poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PEG-PnBA-PDMAEMA), and their in vitro performance and in vivo biodistribution properties were compared with the benchmark PEGylated and basic polycation systems PEG-PDMAEMA and PDMAEMA, respectively. The micelle architecture, incorporating increased PEG shielding and a larger particle size (∼50 nm) than polycation-based complexes (polyplexes; ∼10 nm), enhances siRNA delivery performance in two important aspects: in vitro gene silencing efficiency and in vivo tumor accumulation. The in vitro gene silencing efficiency of the micelleplexes (24% in HeLa cells) was significantly better than the statistically insignificant levels observed for PDMAEMA and PEG-PDMAEMA polyplexes under identical conditions. This enhancement is linked to the different mechanisms by which micelleplexes are internalized (i.e., caveolar, etc.) compared to PDMAEMA and PEG-PDMAEMA polyplexes. Folate-functionalization significantly improved micelleplex uptake but had negligible influence on gene-silencing efficiency, suggesting that this parameter is not limited by cellular internalization. In vivo biodistribution analysis revealed that siRNA delivered by micelleplexes was more effectively accumulated and retained in tumor tissues than that delivered by PEGylated polyplexes. Overall, the micelle particle size and architecture appear to improve in vitro and in vivo delivery characteristics without significantly changing other properties, such as cytotoxicity and resistance to enzymes and dissociation. The self-assembled nature of micelleplexes is expected to enable incorporation of imaging modalities inside the hydrophobic micelle core, thus combining therapeutic and diagnostic capabilities. The findings from the present study suggest that the micelleplex-type carrier architecture is a useful platform for potential theranostic and tumor-targeting applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21456626      PMCID: PMC3381331          DOI: 10.1021/nn102540y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  43 in total

1.  Strength of conjugate binding to plasmid DNA affects degradation rate and expression level in vivo.

Authors:  P M Mullen; C P Lollo; Q C Phan; A Amini; M G Banaszczyk; J M Fabrycki; D Wu; A T Carlo; P Pezzoli; C C Coffin; D J Carlo
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2000-09-01

2.  Sequence-specific knockdown of EWS-FLI1 by targeted, nonviral delivery of small interfering RNA inhibits tumor growth in a murine model of metastatic Ewing's sarcoma.

Authors:  Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Jeremy D Heidel; Derek W Bartlett; Mark E Davis; Timothy J Triche
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A Fire; S Xu; M K Montgomery; S A Kostas; S E Driver; C C Mello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Retention of cytosine arabinoside in mouse lung following intravenous administration in liposomes of different size.

Authors:  C A Hunt; Y M Rustum; E Mayhew; D Papahadjopoulos
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  A discussion of the pH-dependent protonation behaviors of poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) and poly(ethylenimine-ran-2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (P(EI-r-EOz)).

Authors:  Hoyoung Lee; Sang Ha Son; Rahul Sharma; You-Yeon Won
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  The first targeted delivery of siRNA in humans via a self-assembling, cyclodextrin polymer-based nanoparticle: from concept to clinic.

Authors:  Mark E Davis
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Design of liposomes to improve delivery of macrophage-augmenting agents to alveolar macrophages.

Authors:  I J Fidler; A Raz; W E Fogler; R Kirsh; P Bugelski; G Poste
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Polymer-based siRNA delivery: perspectives on the fundamental and phenomenological distinctions from polymer-based DNA delivery.

Authors:  Dana J Gary; Nitin Puri; You-Yeon Won
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Missing pieces in understanding the intracellular trafficking of polycation/DNA complexes.

Authors:  You-Yeon Won; Rahul Sharma; Stephen F Konieczny
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  A novel mechanism is involved in cationic lipid-mediated functional siRNA delivery.

Authors:  James J Lu; Robert Langer; Jianzhu Chen
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  21 in total

1.  Overcoming endosomal barrier by amphotericin B-loaded dual pH-responsive PDMA-b-PDPA micelleplexes for siRNA delivery.

Authors:  Haijun Yu; Yonglong Zou; Yiguang Wang; Xiaonan Huang; Gang Huang; Baran D Sumer; David A Boothman; Jinming Gao
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Mukaddes Izci; Christy Maksoudian; Bella B Manshian; Stefaan J Soenen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  A fabricated siRNA nanoparticle for ultra-long gene silencing in vivo.

Authors:  Seung Koo Lee; Ching-Hsuan Tung
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 4.  Progress toward in vivo use of siRNAs-II.

Authors:  Garrett R Rettig; Mark A Behlke
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Targeting CD133(+) laryngeal carcinoma cells with chemotherapeutic drugs and siRNA against ABCG2 mediated by thermo/pH-sensitive mesoporous silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Xinmeng Qi; Dan Yu; Bo Jia; Chunshun Jin; Xueshibojie Liu; Xue Zhao; Guangxin Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-09

6.  Charged group surface accessibility determines micelleplexes formation and cellular interaction.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Yang Liu; Soumyo Sen; Petr Král; Richard A Gemeinhart
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 7.790

7.  The effect of N/P ratio on the in vitro and in vivo interaction properties of PEGylated poly[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate]-based siRNA complexes.

Authors:  Dana J Gary; Jungbin Min; Youngwook Kim; Keunchil Park; You-Yeon Won
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.979

8.  Balancing cationic and hydrophobic content of PEGylated siRNA polyplexes enhances endosome escape, stability, blood circulation time, and bioactivity in vivo.

Authors:  Christopher E Nelson; James R Kintzing; Ann Hanna; Joshua M Shannon; Mukesh K Gupta; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Overcoming nonviral gene delivery barriers: perspective and future.

Authors:  Charles H Jones; Chih-Kuang Chen; Anitha Ravikrishnan; Snehal Rane; Blaine A Pfeifer
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Hydrogels for lentiviral gene delivery.

Authors:  Stephanie K Seidlits; Robert Michael Gower; Jaclyn A Shepard; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 6.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.